Results for “institutional-reform”

Designs and automates identity governance lifecycle processes including joiner-mover-leaver workflows, role mining, access requests, periodic recertification, and orphaned account remediation using IGA platforms.

Audits code quality against a shared contract, producing structured findings and blocking pipeline phases on critical issues without modifying code.

Audits code quality against a shared contract, returning structured findings without modifying code. Supports gate, audit, diff, changed, and verify modes.

Recursive self-improving holon λ(ο,Κ,Σ).τ' for knowledge compounding and schema evolution. USE WHEN learning, improving, optimizing, assessing, reflecting, debugging, synthesizing, or refining—whether human, AI, or organizational. Triggers on /learn, /compound, /improve, /refine, /optimize, /assess, /reflect, "lessons learned", "best practices", "continuous improvement". Preserves Κ-monotonicity, η≥4, homoiconicity.

Restructure an academic paper's title and section structure to match a target journal's house style. Asks the user to specify the target journal first, then adjusts main.tex accordingly (title wording and case, section skeleton, heading case, numbering scheme, merging/splitting sections). Trigger when user says "paper style" / "paper-style" / "期刊风格" / "按目标期刊调整" / "调整为XX风格" / "JFE风格" / "convert to journal style" / "restructure for [journal]", or wants a paper's title/sections reformatted for a specific journal submission.

Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team.

Orchestrates the full academic research pipeline (research, write, integrity check, review, revise, re-review, re-revise, final integrity check, finalize), coordinating alterlab-deep-research, alterlab-paper-writer, and alterlab-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Use when the request mentions academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, or complete paper workflow. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.

Simulates a complete international journal peer review process with 5 dynamically configured reviewers, producing structured editorial decisions and revision roadmaps.

Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team.

Structural editor that proposes cuts, reorganization, and simplification while preserving comprehension. Use when user requests structural review or editorial review of structure

Generate an institutional-grade investment banking pitch deck (HTML)

Build or modify a RAG retrieval pipeline with vector store search, corpus routing, citation rendering, and book fidelity enforcement.

Runs a 13-agent deep research pipeline for rigorous academic work on any topic across 7 modes (full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis), covering research-question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk-of-bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial and devil's-advocate review, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Use when the request mentions research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, or 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.

当个人希望提升自身在职业或社会中的不可替代性，以应对环境变化和不确定性时

Apply named refactoring transformations to improve code structure without changing behavior, guided by code smells and safe transformation sequences.

Builds or modifies a RAG pipeline with intent-based routing, vector store search, citation rendering, and book fidelity enforcement.

Drafts and revises academic papers through a 12-agent pipeline with hardened LaTeX output (apa7 document class, justified text, table column-width formula, centered bilingual abstracts, standardized font stack, PDF compiled from LaTeX), supporting IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures, APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, and Vancouver citation formats, bilingual zh-TW plus EN abstracts, and multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Use when the request mentions write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, or 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖. Its citation-check mode formats and inserts citations while drafting; for a standalone anti-hallucination check that cited references actually exist prefer alterlab-citation-verifier instead. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.

`analysis-agent`/`task-agent`/`review-agent`: use for structure, workspace or package bootstrap, config, scripts, or quality gates; skip without an initialization decision.

Prüft die Sanierungsfähigkeit eines Unternehmens im Insolvenzverfahren anhand von Fortbestehensprognose, Krisenursachen und integrierter Planung; liefert eine Fristen- und Risikoampel mit Sofortschritten.

Iteratively improves a compiled LaTeX paper through two rounds of external LLM review, fix implementation, and recompilation.

Evaluates the agent's own work, catches mistakes, and improves permanently through self-reflection, self-criticism, and learning from corrections.

Internal architecture and change-impact review assistant for this repository.

Converting repository changes into detailed learning documents. Use when turning diffs into teaching materials, recording design decisions, or creating onboarding materials for new members.

Strategic patterns for solving intractable problems through cascading approximation, self-improvement, and heterogeneous evaluation from DeepMind's AlphaGo system

Provides strategic and operational guidance on ITIL 4 and ITIL 5 frameworks, focusing on AI governance, sustainability, and product-centric lifecycle management.

Orchestrate altering an existing, working feature to new desired behavior by updating tests first, then changing implementation, reviewing, and committing with gated approval.

Reviews an academic paper using the NeurIPS review form with three reviewer personas, ensemble scoring, and reflection refinement. Extracts text from PDF, runs structured review, and outputs actionable feedback.

Ingests case studies, past proposals, and boilerplate from library/inbox into structured indexes. Use when the user requests to 'index proposal library', 're-index case studies', 'ingest inbox docs', or 'validate library'.

Audit a repository, vet and prioritize evidence-backed findings, write drift-aware implementation plans, delegate bounded work, and independently verify results. Use when asked to improve, audit, modernize, harden, review, plan fixes for, or systematically reduce risk in a codebase. Use native isolated agents for implementation; use OpenRouter/free only for narrow advisory audit slices under its safety limits.

Runs a structured bug-fix pipeline: scouts evidence, diagnoses root cause, applies minimal fixes, and reviews before committing.

Modify a classroom task with language scaffolds that preserve cognitive demand for EAL learners. Use when adapting existing tasks for students at different English proficiency levels.

Use when identifying opportunities for incremental improvements in processes, systems, or practices. This skill provides a Kaizen-style framework for ongoing improvement across all areas of operation.

Create IEP templates for individualized education. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with iep-template related tasks.

Simulates a NeurIPS/SC/ICSE-style peer review with five reviewer personas (HPC, ML, Stats, Reproducibility, Devil's Advocate) that verify every claim against actual result data before submission.

Autonomous evolutionary code improvement engine with tournament selection