Results for “methodology-critique”

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality by assessing experimental design, identifying biases and confounders, and applying evidence grading frameworks like GRADE and Cochrane Risk of Bias.

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.

Audits typographic decisions on a screen for scale usage, readability, consistency, and token compliance, providing specific fixes.

Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team.

Philosophy of science methodology examining how research programs evolve through proofs and refutations

Evaluate scientific manuscripts and grant proposals with structured, checklist-based peer review covering methodology, statistics, reproducibility, ethics, and reporting standards.

Stress-test ideas, plans, and decisions using structured critical reasoning across five modes: Socratic questioning, dialectic, pre-mortem, red teaming, and evidence audit.

Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team.

VS-Enhanced Literature Review Strategist - Comprehensive support for multiple review methodologies Full VS 5-Phase process: Prevents Mode Collapse and presents creative search strategies Supports: Systematic Review (PRISMA 2020), Scoping Review (JBI/PRISMA-ScR), Meta-Synthesis, Realist Synthesis, Narrative Review, Rapid Review Use when: conducting any type of literature review, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, scoping reviews, finding prior research Triggers: literature review, PRISMA, systematic review, scoping review, meta-synthesis, realist synthesis, narrative review, rapid review

Spec Craft

4-phase systematic debugging methodology with root cause analysis and evidence-based verification. Use when debugging complex issues.

Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team.

Conduct a structured literature review on a given topic by defining a search strategy, applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracting key findings, and synthesizing results into a coherent academic review. Use when the user requests literature review or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

帮助用户撰写高质量的文献综述类论文。提供从选题、文献检索、评估筛选、结构规划到最终写作的全流程指导。适用于需要撰写独立文献综述论文或学术论文中文献综述部分的用户。

Challenge system assumptions against accumulated evidence. Triages observations and tensions, detects patterns, generates proposals. The scientific method applied to knowledge systems. Triggers on "/rethink", "review observations", "challenge assumptions", "what have I learned".

Structured framework for reviewing UI designs, evaluating visual hierarchy, consistency, accessibility, spacing, typography, and color usage, and providing actionable improvement recommendations.

Experimental methodology and statistical rigor specialist. Use when the user asks to talk to Breach, requests the methodologist, or needs experiment design review, ablation planning, and reproducibility protocols.

Analyze the spatial and structural qualities of a screen design, evaluating balance, whitespace, rhythm, and gestalt principles to identify compositional weaknesses and propose specific fixes.

Clinical copy-editor that reviews text for communication issues. Use when user says review for prose or improve the prose

马东（综艺制作人）认知与表达框架（压缩蒸馏）：赛制叙事、金句剪枝、辩论产品化 触发：奇葩说、乐夏 等。非操纵舆论教程

Generate one high-value follow-up workflow proposal when MoonMind execution quality issues are detected in a run.

Cross-runtime 2-stage pipeline for Claude Code, Codex/OMX, and Gemini/Antigravity/OMA: trace causal hypotheses, inject evidence into deep-interview style requirements crystallization, then hand off to the right runtime planner/executor.

Conduct failure mode and effects analyses. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with fmea-guide related tasks.

Structured planning methodology with research, brainstorming, phased plan creation, risk assessment, and plan-to-build continuity.

Eng manager-mode plan review. (gstack)

北岛（诗人）认知与表达框架（压缩蒸馏）：冷意象、否定句诗学、流亡与记忆 触发：回答、朦胧诗 等。不伪造诗句

Provides the shared STORM methodology, artifact layout, stage-gating contract, citation hygiene, and retrieval fallback. Use when executing any /storm:* skill (generate, research, outline, write, polish). Internal knowledge; never user-invocable.

Audits colour decisions on a screen for contrast ratios, palette coherence, semantic meaning, and accessibility, flagging deviations and recommending specific corrections.

Perform a Cynical Review and produce a findings report. Use when the user requests a critical review of something

Systematic research methodology for formulating problems, building evidence-based arguments, and communicating findings in academic contexts. For scholarly writing, thesis development, and knowledge contribution. NOT for creative writing, journalistic reporting, or business analytics.

Debugging is the scientific method under time pressure.

Multi-perspective dialectical reasoning with cross-evaluative synthesis. Spawns parallel evaluative lenses (STRUCTURAL, EVIDENTIAL, SCOPE, ADVERSARIAL, PRAGMATIC) that critique thesis AND critique each other's critiques, producing N-squared evaluation matrix before recursive aggregation. Triggers on /critique, /dialectic, /crosseval, requests for thorough analysis, stress-testing arguments, or finding weaknesses. Implements Hegelian refinement enhanced with interleaved multi-domain evaluation and convergent synthesis.

Capture friction as methodology notes. Three modes — explicit description, contextual (review recent corrections), session mining (scan transcripts for patterns). Triggers on "/remember", "/remember [description]".