Results for “pull-request-review”

Review, triage, validate, and discuss ClawHub GitHub issues and pull requests with structured evidence, best-fix analysis, and maintainer handoff.

The art of reviewing code that improves both the codebase and the developer - sharing knowledge, maintaining standards, and building cultureUse when "code review, PR review, pull request, merge request, review comments, LGTM, review feedback, approve PR, request changes, review checklist, code quality, review standards, code-review, pull-request, PR, quality, standards, feedback, collaboration, mentoring" mentioned.

Monitor a pull request or review cycle until all checks pass, comments are resolved, and the PR is ready to merge.

Create, update, and comment on GitHub pull requests with a focus on material impact, safety, and human reviewability.

Guides creating small, issue-linked pull requests with conventional branch naming, commit messages, and structured descriptions, plus a review cycle.

Implements a code change on a feature branch, opens a single pull request to main, and runs a code review loop before handoff.

Review code for AEM Edge Delivery Services projects, validating code quality, performance, accessibility, and adherence to EDS best practices during self-review or pull request review.

Code review specialist for quality standards, design patterns, security review, and constructive feedbackUse when "code review, pull request, PR review, code quality, refactor, technical debt, design pattern, best practice, code-review, quality, patterns, security, refactoring, best-practices, pull-request, review, ml-memory" mentioned.

Splits oversized pull requests into sequential, reviewable chunks under 300 lines using stacked PRs or feature branch chains, with dependency tracking and review budget management.

Automates repeated rounds of Copilot code review on GitHub pull requests: triggers review, triages threads, dispatches parallel fix agents, commits, replies, and loops until convergence.

Reviews a pull request: runs its own baseline review of the PR diff, then a persistent Monitor watches CI and incoming reviewer comments, triages each comment through an independent skeptical agent, applies only verified fixes, and commits+pushes via inline git commands until CI passes and no comments remain to adopt — then asks whether to merge. Use this skill when the user asks to "review a PR", "monitor PR review comments", "address reviewer feedback on #123", or "watch CI on a pull request".

Runs a multi-perspective review of a pull request, including code quality, tests, and potential silent failures, then reports findings ranked by severity.

Embed before/after screenshots and annotated images in pull request descriptions to help reviewers see visual changes without checking out the branch.

Review a pull request and POST the review to GitHub via `gh pr review`. Use when asked to review a PR, or when the github-activity poller fires a PR-opened / PR-review-requested event. Always submits after drafting — a review that stays in turn output and never reaches GitHub is a non-review.

Comprehensive code review using specialized agents — orchestrates code, comments, tests, errors, types, and simplify agents sequentially.

Safely upsert, inspect, review, or explicitly merge the pull request for an issue-backed work branch

Review an exact PR head in isolation using trusted-base instructions and execution evidence

Review pull requests following Sentry engineering practices, covering security, performance, testing, and design.

Iterate on a pull request until actionable CI checks pass and high/medium review feedback is addressed, stopping at human approval, draft, or merge gates.

Split a large pull request into multiple smaller PRs to reduce the number of required CODEOWNERS reviewer groups.

Fetch unread GitHub notifications for open PRs where review is requested from a specified team or opened by a team member.

Requesting Code Review

PR Review Skill

Creates a convention-compliant pull request from the current branch, inferring details from git history and code changes.

通用跨模型审查：Review LLM 对任意研究制品进行独立评审，输出结构化评分、wiki 实体映射与改进建议

Perform thorough code reviews on files or pull requests, checking for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and style violations. Use when the user requests code review or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

Use this skill for code review and PR review tasks. Covers review methodology, what to flag, what to skip, and output structure.

Produces a maintainer-grade review of a pull request or large contribution, explaining the change tutorial-style and delivering a polished HTML or Markdown report with a concrete merge recommendation.

Use when the user asks to review pull requests, analyze code changes, check for security issues in PRs, or assess code quality of diffs.

Create pull requests following Sentry conventions. Use when opening PRs, writing PR descriptions, or preparing changes for review. Follows Sentry's code review guidelines.