Results for “research-frameworks”

Guides researchers through structured ideation frameworks to discover high-impact research directions. Use when exploring new problem spaces, pivoting between projects, or seeking novel angles on existing work.

Applies cognitive science frameworks for creative thinking to CS and AI research ideation. Use when seeking genuinely novel research directions by leveraging combinatorial creativity, analogical reasoning, constraint manipulation, and other empirically grounded creative strategies.

Master the AI tools that accelerate research and information gathering. From market research to academic analysis, find insights faster and make better decisions. Use when "research, find information, academic papers, market research, competitive intelligence, fact check, research, information, analysis, academic, market-research" mentioned.

Routes research queries to specialist skills or runs a fallback search-and-synthesize workflow, with deterministic classification and transparent routing decisions.

Research the open web for enhancement opportunities (Layer 3 — Opus subagent with WebSearch + WebFetch). Topic-driven. Returns structured findings with hype tags + source URLs. Does NOT auto-implement.

研究优先于编码的工作流程。在编写自定义代码之前，搜索现有的工具、库和模式。调用研究员代理。

Research-before-coding workflow. Search for existing tools, libraries, and patterns before writing custom code. Invokes the researcher agent.

---

Research external tools/competitors for a topic and write findings to BRAINSTORM.md (project topics) or ~/.clade/research/ (personal topics). Use when user says "/research [topic]".

Research-before-coding workflow. Search for existing tools, libraries, and patterns before writing custom code. Invokes the researcher agent.

Applies cognitive science frameworks for creative thinking to CS and AI research ideation. Use when seeking genuinely novel research directions by leveraging combinatorial creativity, analogical reasoning, constraint manipulation, and other empirically grounded creative strategies.

Research-before-coding workflow. Search for existing tools, libraries, and patterns before writing custom code. Invokes the researcher agent.

research-synthesis

Framework for building LLM-powered applications with agents, chains, and RAG. Supports multiple providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google), 500+ integrations, ReAct agents, tool calling, memory management, and vector store retrieval. Use for building chatbots, question-answering systems, autonomous agents, or RAG applications. Best for rapid prototyping and production deployments.

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.

Orchestrates the full academic research pipeline from exploration to final manuscript, coordinating research, writing, integrity verification, peer review, revision, and finalization stages with user confirmation checkpoints.

Researches VC funds and partners, providing thesis matching, portfolio analysis, and approach strategy for outreach.

Research existing tools, libraries, and patterns before writing custom code by invoking a researcher agent.

Build and maintain a research repository that makes findings findable, reusable, and cumulative across the organization.

Conducts end-to-end user research, from study design through behavioral insight synthesis, using frameworks like Nielsen's Heuristics, SUS, and User Journey Mapping.

Researches an open-ended question — options, possible solutions, prior art, trade-offs, or how something works — and produces a durable, evidence-backed, adversarially-validated report that recommends an option without committing the team to any artifact. Use when you want to research approaches, weigh options, survey prior art or the state of the art, or understand how something works before committing to a direction. Does not diagnose a bug, failure, or root cause — use investigate. Does not specify a feature — use plan-a-feature. Does not create or update a coding standard — use coding-standard. Does not compare two concrete artifacts for gaps — use gap-analysis. Does not assess an existing module's architecture — use architectural-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback.

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.

Researches and recommends programming technologies, libraries, and architectural approaches with verified references from official documentation.

Orchestrates end-to-end autonomous AI research projects using a two-loop architecture for rapid experimentation and synthesis, producing papers and presentations.

Transparent, rigorous research with full methodology — not a black-box API wrapper. Conducts exhaustive investigation through mandated 2-cycle research per theme, APA 7th citations, evidence hierarchy, and 3 user checkpoints. Self-contained using native OpenClaw tools (web_search, web_fetch, sessions_spawn). Use for literature reviews, competitive intelligence, or any research requiring academic rigor and reproducibility.

Runs a multi-agent academic research pipeline covering systematic review, LaTeX paper writing, peer review, and end-to-end orchestration with integrity gates.

Full research pipeline: Workflow 1 (idea discovery) → implementation → Workflow 2 (auto review loop). Goes from a broad research direction all the way to a submission-ready paper. Use when user says "全流程", "full pipeline", "从找idea到投稿", "end-to-end research", or wants the complete autonomous research lifecycle.

Provides a structured reasoning protocol for diagnosing complex relationships, organizations, institutions, public disputes, or long-term evolution using the CrossFrame framework, with explicit invocation required.

根据研究者提供的**研究计划书（Research Proposal）**执行基于**外国（美国/欧盟/英国/日本/跨国）制度环境**的公司金融类实证研究全流程。**启动后第一件事：根据计划书的主题、识别策略、贡献边际与样本范围，从外国 CF 顶刊池（AER/QJE/JPE/JF/JFE/RFS/JFQA/JAR/JAE/MS/JCF/JBF 等 25+ 期刊）中推荐 5 本最匹配的目标期刊（[J1]–[J5]），等待研究者明确选定一本；该期刊决定 main.tex 的 bibliographystyle、Section 骨架、Introduction 风格与表注规范**。然后用 Python 完成数据清洗、描述性统计、基准回归、内生性检验（IV/2SLS、DML）、平行趋势、异质性、机制、稳健性检验与图表绘制。LaTeX 表格和图像严格遵循 template/ 示例格式，研究逻辑与排版严格遵循 rule/ 下的《通用实证研究逻辑与规范总结》与《回归表写作规范总结》。数据集与政策集从 asset/ 中按计划书中的关键词检索（WRDS / NBER/Fed releases / FRED / 全球宏观库）。**当计划书预期的实证结果无法实现时（系数不显著、平行趋势不通过、IV 弱工具、机制不成立等），skill 自动切换备选方案直至完成研究项目**。最终交付物：Python 代码 + LaTeX 表格 + 图像（.pdf/.png）。触发条件：研究者提交研究计划书（含 X→Y 假设、识别策略、样本、政策冲击等）。

Research companies, industries, or competitor sets using web search and seven analytical lenses to produce structured intelligence for downstream product management tasks.