Results for “research-proposal”

Produces academic papers, literature reviews, grant proposals, and clinical reports with LaTeX formatting and verified citations, using research-lookup and parallel-web skills.

Draft a structured grant proposal from research ideas and literature. Supports KAKENHI (Japan), NSF (US), NSFC (China, including 面上/青年/优青/杰青/海外优青/重点), ERC (EU), DFG (Germany), SNSF (Switzerland), ARC (Australia), NWO (Netherlands), and generic formats. Use when user says "write grant", "grant proposal", "申請書", "write KAKENHI", "科研費", "基金申请", "写基金", "NSF proposal", or wants to turn research ideas into a funding application.

金融经济学实证论文计划书生成器。根据用户提供的研究方向，生成包含标题、假说、数据来源、实证策略、 预期结果表格、稳健性检验、异质性分析、机制检验等12个完整模块的研究计划书。 内置中国微观/宏观数据库（皮皮侠1599个数据集、马克数据377个数据集）和WRDS国际数据库索引， 自动匹配可用数据源。融合Edmans (2024) "Learnings From 1000 Rejections"的编辑视角作为质量护栏， 确保选题具有真正的边际贡献而非"just another determinant of Y"。 当用户提到以下任何情境时触发：写研究计划书、research proposal、论文开题、选题+计划、 帮我设计一个实证研究、empirical research design、我想研究X对Y的影响怎么做、 帮我找个能发表的选题、generate proposal、写一个可以投稿的研究方案、 研究设计、identification strategy、DID/RDD/IV研究设计。 即使用户只是描述了一个经济金融现象并想知道"能不能做成论文"，也应考虑使用此技能。

用于国自然、国社科等基金申请、开题报告、博士后/人才计划、研究计划书等学术提案的撰写、审查和优化；当用户需要基于已有研究成果形成立项书、区分事实与 AI 建议、检查任务书一致性、补强论证逻辑时使用。

Use when a research proposal needs work packages, milestones, deliverables, a timeline, a risk register, and budget-justification scaffolding, while keeping scientific claims and feasibility honest and human-owned.

Generate one high-value follow-up workflow proposal when MoonMind execution quality issues are detected in a run.

Generate one best-next-step proposal after a successful task run, either the next phase in a series or a high-value improvement.

Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.

Turn a refined research proposal or method idea into a detailed, claim-driven experiment roadmap. Use after `research-refine`, or when the user asks for a detailed experiment plan, ablation matrix, evaluation protocol, run order, compute budget, or paper-ready validation that supports the core problem, novelty, simplicity, and any LLM / VLM / Diffusion / RL-based contribution.

Research-backed evolution advice for your knowledge system. Analyzes health reports, friction patterns, and derivation history to propose specific changes with research justification. Never auto-implements — proposals require your approval.

Turn a refined research proposal or method idea into a detailed, claim-driven experiment roadmap. Use when the user asks for a detailed experiment plan, ablation matrix, evaluation protocol, run order, compute budget, or paper-ready validation that supports the core problem, novelty, simplicity, and any LLM / VLM / Diffusion / RL-based contribution.

通用跨模型审查：Review LLM 对任意研究制品进行独立评审，输出结构化评分、wiki 实体映射与改进建议

Formaliza una idea como propuesta de cambio antes de invertir tiempo en especificaciones y diseño, alineando contexto, alternativas, impacto y criterios de éxito.

Derive a portable product-idea kickoff prompt from the invoking repository for use with $idea-scope-brief in a different repository. Use when a repo suggests an adjacent product, SaaS, devtool, library, workflow, or experiment worth briefing elsewhere, but the user wants an idea prompt rather than code extraction or repo creation.

Generate and rank research ideas given a broad direction. Use when user says "找idea", "brainstorm ideas", "generate research ideas", "what can we work on", or wants to explore a research area for publishable directions.

Ingests case studies, past proposals, and boilerplate from library/inbox into structured indexes. Use when the user requests to 'index proposal library', 're-index case studies', 'ingest inbox docs', or 'validate library'.

Give a decisive, project-grounded point of view in the subject's own shape: a graded verdict on an external-adoption question, a holistic take on a document, or a position on a user-supplied approach set. Use for a solo POV, a mid-session second opinion, a named-peer cross-check, any request to consult other models or reconcile their opinions, an `oracle` panel, or a correction-cost-gated proactive cross-check offer. Not for findings review (use ce-doc-review), neutral explainers, or generating options (use ce-ideate or ce-brainstorm).

NIH grant research skill for clinical researchers. Grill-me intake (research idea + career stage + preliminary data + environment + submission posture + known institute targets) locks down the funding strategy before any search runs. Runs a 5-facet Consensus positioning analysis (with draft Significance/Innovation language), maps the research to the right NIH institutes and study sections via RePORTER, finds NOSIs and funded overlap, and produces an editable Word document (.docx) with budget/scope-aware mechanism recommendations, submission timelines, and a mandatory program officer recommendation. Use when the user asks about research funding or makes any grant-related request (e.g., 'grants for [topic]', 'find grants for my research idea', 'what grants match my research', 'help me find NIH funding', 'grant opportunities for my research'). NIH-only scope — non-NIH funders (PCORI, DOD CDMRP, VA, foundations) are out of scope and flagged at intake.

Creates a complete change proposal with design, specs, and tasks in one step, ready for implementation.

Creates a complete change proposal with design, specs, and tasks in one step, ready for implementation.

Skeptical pushback on the research dossier before it feeds the outline. Asks whether claims are cited, whether surprising findings are actually surprising, whether we missed the strongest competitor angle. One revision pass on FAIL (BLOG_AGENT_RESEARCH_REVISION_BUDGET, default 1).

NIH grant research skill for clinical researchers. Grill-me intake (research idea + career stage + preliminary data + environment + submission posture + known institute targets) locks down the funding strategy before any search runs. Runs a 5-face...

Search Notion pages, synthesize findings, and publish structured briefs, summaries, comparisons, or reports with citations and source links.

Generate and critically evaluate grounded ideas about a topic. Use when asking what to improve, requesting idea generation, exploring surprising directions, or wanting the AI to proactively suggest strong options before brainstorming one in depth. Triggers on phrases like 'what should I improve', 'give me ideas', 'ideate on X', 'surprise me', 'what would you change', or any request for AI-generated suggestions rather than refining the user's own idea.

Researches VC funds and partners, providing thesis matching, portfolio analysis, and approach strategy for outreach.

Draft an internal legal research memo for the supervising attorney with verified authority and flagged open questions.

Create tailored sales proposals and RFP responses that address prospect needs, articulate solution value, and include pricing, timelines, and social proof. Use when the user requests proposal generation or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

Write construction bid proposals with scope and pricing. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with bid-proposal related tasks.

Researches and recommends programming technologies, libraries, and architectural approaches with verified references from official documentation.

Review a code file or directory and produce an evidence-backed GitHub or Jira issue proposing bug fixes, performance improvements, modularity improvements, DRY refactors, file splitting, reusable helpers, and architecture-alignment work. Use when a user asks for a code review, technical-debt proposal, refactor proposal, quality audit, bug-risk review, architecture-alignment review, or issue creation. This skill proposes work; it does not modify code.