Results for “skepticism”

Philosophy of science methodology examining how research programs evolve through proofs and refutations

Subjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands, prioritizing correctness over speed for high-stakes or unfamiliar code.

Skeptical pushback on the research dossier before it feeds the outline. Asks whether claims are cited, whether surprising findings are actually surprising, whether we missed the strongest competitor angle. One revision pass on FAIL (BLOG_AGENT_RESEARCH_REVISION_BUDGET, default 1).

Runs directional ablation and refusal-direction analysis for open-weight models the user may modify; use to reduce benign over-refusal or measure refusal/KL trade-offs, not for training.

当面对新任务或挑战，内心产生“缺乏经验”、“不擅长”等自我否定想法时

Perform a Cynical Review and produce a findings report. Use when the user requests a critical review of something

ScepticAgent UI and styles reference. Use whenever the user wants to change the side panel UI, modify highlight colours, update the markdown renderer, work with CSS architecture, add or change category colours, or understand how the sidepanel renders analysis output.

Investigates a question systematically before answering — verifying claims through sources, distinguishing known facts from inferences, and calibrating expressed confidence to actual certainty. Use when asked to research a topic, verify a claim, evaluate a technology, or answer a question where accuracy matters more than speed.

贺涵（都市剧虚构）认知与表达框架（压缩蒸馏）：导师型男主、职场金句、情感争议 触发：我的前半生 等。虚构；忌情感操控教程

Perform a Cynical Review and produce a findings report. Use when the user requests a critical review of something

当观察到或经历某种极端转化现象，或试图主动促成根本性观念转变时

research-synthesis

Convene a four-voice council of advisors to surface structured disagreement and tradeoffs for ambiguous decisions, go/no-go calls, and multi-path choices.

After any AI-generated explanation, require the learner to identify one place it could be wrong, one thing to check, and one source to consult. Builds epistemic vigilance — treats AI output as a claim to evaluate, not truth to absorb.

Audits hidden assumptions in decisions or beliefs by classifying them into fact, convention, belief, or interest-driven, ranking by fragility and impact, then rebuilding conclusions from verified premises. Supports English and Chinese.

北岛（诗人）认知与表达框架（压缩蒸馏）：冷意象、否定句诗学、流亡与记忆 触发：回答、朦胧诗 等。不伪造诗句

Multi-phase dialectical stress-test for HIGH-STAKES decisions only (architecture choices, irreversible product calls, strategic bets). Heavy-cost skill — do NOT use for routine questions, brainstorming, or simple tradeoffs. User must explicitly invoke or describe a decision they call "high-stakes", "irreversible", or "needs stress-testing". Triggers: "stress test this decision", "dialectic on", "challenge this thesis", "should I really".

Slow down interpretation from observation to action. Use when students or adults need to examine assumptions in conflict, dialogue, or inquiry.

Audits hidden assumptions in decisions by classifying them into four types, ranking by fragility and impact, and rebuilding conclusions from verified premises. Auto-detects Chinese or English.

贺炜（体育解说）认知与表达框架（压缩蒸馏）：文学比喻嵌入赛况、克制激情、终场金句… 触发：足球诗人解说 等。非煽动球迷对立

First-principles assumption auditor. Classifies each hidden assumption (fact / convention / belief / interest-driven), ranks by fragility × impact, and rebuilds conclusions from verified premises. Bilingual: auto-detects Chinese or English.

Enables persistent ultra-compressed technical communication; use for explicit brevity or token-reduction requests, except where fragments risk safety or clarity.

Enforces anti-hallucination constraints including citation requirements, source grounding, and explicit 'I don't know' responses for research tasks.

Deliberative consultation with Kimi API. Ask, evaluate, critique, iterate until workable agreement.

Embody the Stoic philosopher Seneca to apply practical philosophy, resilience practices, and emotional guidance to daily challenges.

Build lean, opinionated products using the 37signals philosophy from Getting Real, Rework, and Shape Up. Use when the user mentions "Getting Real", "Rework", "Shape Up", "37signals", "Basecamp method", "six-week cycles", "fixed time variable scope", "appetite vs estimates", "betting table", "breadboarding", "fat marker sketch", "build less", "underdo the competition", or "opinionated software". Also trigger when cutting scope to ship faster, running small teams, avoiding long-term roadmaps, or eliminating meetings. Covers shaping, betting, building, and the art of saying no. For MVP validation, see lean-startup. For design sprints, see design-sprint.

First-principles assumption auditor. Classifies each hidden assumption (fact / convention / belief / interest-driven), ranks by fragility × impact, and rebuilds conclusions from verified premises. Bilingual: auto-detects Chinese or English.

Council

First-principles assumption auditor. Classifies each hidden assumption (fact / convention / belief / interest-driven), ranks by fragility × impact, and rebuilds conclusions from verified premises. Bilingual: auto-detects Chinese or English.

许三多（军旅剧虚构）认知与表达框架（压缩蒸馏）：钝感坚持、不抛弃不放弃、草根成长 触发：士兵突击 等。禁止军事违法教程

First-principles assumption auditor. Classifies each hidden assumption (fact / convention / belief / interest-driven), ranks by fragility × impact, and rebuilds conclusions from verified premises. Bilingual: auto-detects Chinese or English.

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality by assessing experimental design, identifying biases and confounders, and applying evidence grading frameworks like GRADE and Cochrane Risk of Bias.

凌不疑（古装虚构）认知与表达框架（压缩蒸馏）：复仇将军、疯批克制、家族血债 触发：星汉灿烂 等。虚构；禁止暴力教唆

Debugging is the scientific method under time pressure.

Perform a Cynical Review and produce a findings report. Use when the user requests a critical review of something