Results for “thesis-matching”

research-synthesis

Find adjacent vendors and subs (not top market primes) who fill a capability gap against a displacement target using USASpending flows and SAM entity signals. Use when user defines a teaming gap and wants vault-ready partner shortlist with citations.

基于 anchor 论文、topic 关键词或当前 wiki 状态，产出一份排好序的候选论文 shortlist，供用户或上游 skill 决定是否进一步 `/ingest`。当用户问 "接下来该读什么"、"找和这篇相似的论文"、"推荐相关工作"、"这个方向周围有什么" 时触发；`/ingest --discover` 也会内部调用本 skill。本身不 ingest，只提出候选。

根据研究者提供的**研究计划书（Research Proposal）**执行基于**外国（美国/欧盟/英国/日本/跨国）制度环境**的公司金融类实证研究全流程。**启动后第一件事：根据计划书的主题、识别策略、贡献边际与样本范围，从外国 CF 顶刊池（AER/QJE/JPE/JF/JFE/RFS/JFQA/JAR/JAE/MS/JCF/JBF 等 25+ 期刊）中推荐 5 本最匹配的目标期刊（[J1]–[J5]），等待研究者明确选定一本；该期刊决定 main.tex 的 bibliographystyle、Section 骨架、Introduction 风格与表注规范**。然后用 Python 完成数据清洗、描述性统计、基准回归、内生性检验（IV/2SLS、DML）、平行趋势、异质性、机制、稳健性检验与图表绘制。LaTeX 表格和图像严格遵循 template/ 示例格式，研究逻辑与排版严格遵循 rule/ 下的《通用实证研究逻辑与规范总结》与《回归表写作规范总结》。数据集与政策集从 asset/ 中按计划书中的关键词检索（WRDS / NBER/Fed releases / FRED / 全球宏观库）。**当计划书预期的实证结果无法实现时（系数不显著、平行趋势不通过、IV 弱工具、机制不成立等），skill 自动切换备选方案直至完成研究项目**。最终交付物：Python 代码 + LaTeX 表格 + 图像（.pdf/.png）。触发条件：研究者提交研究计划书（含 X→Y 假设、识别策略、样本、政策冲击等）。

Use to merge overlapping help articles without breaking search, bookmarks, or AI grounding — choosing a canonical page, setting redirects, and measuring post-merge impact. Trigger for "we have duplicate KB articles", consolidate help centre content, merge knowledge base articles, KB deduplication, article redirects, canonical help article, or overlapping docs confusing customers and search.

Compares two or more band-tagged frameworks and produces a framework-neutral topic matrix showing coverage and gaps across all inputs, plus an optional reference-centric PLC crosswalk document when a reference framework is supplied.

Process and analyze mass spectrometry data: import spectra from MGF, mzML, MSP, and JSON formats; apply 40+ filters for metadata harmonization and peak cleaning; compute spectral similarities (cosine, modified cosine) for compound identification; build reproducible processing pipelines.

Compare Itô prediction-market baskets against a user's knowledge base, portfolio notes, financial context, watchlist, or research thesis for read-only gap analysis.

Research the open web for enhancement opportunities (Layer 3 — Opus subagent with WebSearch + WebFetch). Topic-driven. Returns structured findings with hype tags + source URLs. Does NOT auto-implement.

从 wiki 知识生成论文 Related Work 章节：主题分组 → 叙事结构 → LaTeX 输出，遵循 citation-verification 和 academic-writing

Computes mass-spectral similarity and identifies compounds for metabolomics with matchms — comparing mass spectra, scoring similarity (cosine, modified cosine), and searching spectral libraries to annotate unknowns. Use when matching MS/MS spectra, identifying metabolites, or library searching; for full LC-MS/MS proteomics pipelines use pyopenms. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.

Merges multiple research, analysis, or brainstorming inputs into a single coherent synthesis with key insights and a recommended action.

Look up current research and scientific information across three backends: fast web search, deep multi-source synthesis, and scholarly paper searches. Automatically routes each query to the best backend and saves every result for reproducible citation.

Mass spectrometry analysis. Process mzML/MGF/MSP, spectral similarity (cosine, modified cosine), metadata harmonization, compound ID, for metabolomics and MS data processing.

Build students' capacity to compare accounts across multiple historical sources — identifying agreements, contradictions, and gaps. Use when students treat individual documents as complete answers rather than partial perspectives.

Orients researchers to an unfamiliar academic field by searching Consensus, building a strategic search plan with PICO or other frameworks, and synthesizing findings into a formatted Word document.

Perform semantic search, find similar content, and conduct structured research using the Exa API.

Spectral similarity and compound identification for metabolomics. Use for comparing mass spectra, computing similarity scores (cosine, modified cosine), and identifying unknown compounds from spectral libraries. Best for metabolite identification, spectral matching, library searching. For full LC-MS/MS proteomics pipelines use pyopenms.

Process and analyze mass spectrometry data with the Matchms Python library, including importing spectra, filtering peaks, calculating similarity scores, and building reproducible analytical workflows.

Audit and reconcile the shared project glossary — find stale terms, missing definitions, conflicts, shadows, inheritance gaps, and cross-path divergences across research docs

根据研究者提供的**研究计划书（Research Proposal）**执行基于中国制度环境的公司金融类实证研究全流程。**启动后第一件事：根据计划书的主题、识别策略、贡献边际与样本范围，从中国-context 英文顶级期刊池（JF/JFE/RFS/JFQA/MS/JCF/JBF/JAR/JAE/TAR/CAR/JIBS/China Economic Review/PBFJ 等 25+ 期刊）中推荐 5 本最匹配的目标期刊（[J1]–[J5]），等待研究者明确选定一本；该期刊决定 main.tex 的 bibliographystyle、Section 骨架、Introduction 风格与表注规范**。然后用 Python 完成数据清洗、描述性统计、基准回归、内生性检验（IV/2SLS、DML）、平行趋势、异质性、机制、稳健性检验与图表绘制。LaTeX 表格和图像严格遵循 template/ 示例格式，研究逻辑与排版严格遵循 rule/ 下的《通用实证研究逻辑与规范总结》与《回归表写作规范总结》。数据集与政策集从 asset/ 中按计划书中的关键词检索。**当计划书预期的实证结果无法实现时（系数不显著、平行趋势不通过、IV 弱工具、机制不成立等），skill 自动切换备选方案直至完成研究项目**。最终交付物：Python 代码 + LaTeX 表格 + 图像（.pdf/.png）。触发条件：研究者提交研究计划书（含 X→Y 假设、识别策略、样本、政策冲击等）。

Use when paired tr.md and en.md files need a parity verdict, when titles, frontmatter, headings, or DOI sets may have drifted between languages, or when a bilingual document is approaching release and its translation coverage needs an audit.

Analyzes multiple provided pages to identify keyword overlap and potential cannibalization issues. Suggests differentiation strategies. Use PROACTIVELY when reviewing similar content.

Verify academic citations against CrossRef, Semantic Scholar, and OpenAlex. Detects AI-hallucinated references, chimeric citations, and suspicious patterns.

Decision-grade entity research skill — produces a hypothesis-tested dossier on a specific company, person, nonprofit, or government org, not a generic profile. Forcing intake makes the user state their hypothesis upfront (what they already believe and want to verify or disprove) so the dossier tests it rather than confirms it. Output is an editable Word document (.docx) with verdict on the hypothesis, identity facts, 12-month activity timeline, network and reputation signals, red flags, conversation hooks tied to specific findings, and source-provenance audit log. Uses WebSearch + WebFetch + free APIs (SEC EDGAR, GitHub, ProPublica) as workhorses; optional BYOK MCPs enhance coverage. Use when the user asks for background research, diligence, or meeting prep on a specific entity (e.g., 'prep me for a meeting with [person/company]', 'due diligence on [company]'). Honors sensitivity exclusions for journalism + personal-vetting contexts.

Conduct multi-pass web and academic research, cross-check claims, and produce a cited report saved to file and memory.

Mass spectrometry analysis. Process mzML/MGF/MSP, spectral similarity (cosine, modified cosine), metadata harmonization, compound ID, for metabolomics and MS data processing.

Find compatible cofounders, collaborators, and friends through validated psychological profiling and mathematical compatibility matching.

English LaTeX academic paper assistant for existing `.tex` projects. Use this skill whenever the user wants to compile, lint, audit, or improve an English LaTeX conference or journal paper such as IEEE, ACM, Springer, NeurIPS, or ICML submissions. Trigger even when the user only mentions one paper issue, such as bibliography errors, grammar cleanup, sentence splitting, logic review, expression polishing, translation, title optimization, figure checks, pseudocode review, algorithm block cleanup, de-AI editing, or experiment-section review. Also trigger for "proofread my paper", "fix my LaTeX", "prepare for submission", "check my manuscript", "improve my writing", `algorithm2e`, `algorithmicx`, `algpseudocodex`, `Require/Ensure`, or "Algorithm 1" when the user has a .tex file.

Find connections between notes and update MOCs. Requires semantic judgment to identify genuine relationships. Use after /reduce creates notes, when exploring connections, or when a topic needs synthesis. Triggers on "/reflect", "/reflect [note]", "find connections", "update MOCs", "connect these notes".

NIH grant research skill for clinical researchers. Grill-me intake (research idea + career stage + preliminary data + environment + submission posture + known institute targets) locks down the funding strategy before any search runs. Runs a 5-facet Consensus positioning analysis (with draft Significance/Innovation language), maps the research to the right NIH institutes and study sections via RePORTER, finds NOSIs and funded overlap, and produces an editable Word document (.docx) with budget/scope-aware mechanism recommendations, submission timelines, and a mandatory program officer recommendation. Use when the user asks about research funding or makes any grant-related request (e.g., 'grants for [topic]', 'find grants for my research idea', 'what grants match my research', 'help me find NIH funding', 'grant opportunities for my research'). NIH-only scope — non-NIH funders (PCORI, DOD CDMRP, VA, foundations) are out of scope and flagged at intake.

Mass spectrometry analysis. Process mzML/MGF/MSP, spectral similarity (cosine, modified cosine), metadata harmonization, compound ID, for metabolomics and MS data processing.

NLVR2: A Visual Reasoning Benchmark for Natural Language

Generate one high-value follow-up workflow proposal when MoonMind execution quality issues are detected in a run.

Synthesize market breadth, regime, and flow signals into a unified capital commitment recommendation with exposure ceiling, bias, and action guidance.