backlog-groomer
Purpose
Review and refine backlog items for clarity, readiness, priority, sequencing, and hidden ambiguity before sprint commitment.
Trigger this skill when
- The team is working in iterations, sprints, or short delivery cycles.
- Backlog items, sprint outcomes, or team process signals need structured review.
- You need clearer delivery discipline instead of vague “be more agile” advice.
Expected inputs
- backlog items
- business priority context
- dependencies
- known blockers
- team constraints
Deliverables
- groomed backlog view
- readiness assessment
- priority notes
- dependency flags
- items needing clarification
Operating procedure
- Clarify the delivery context, scope, and timebox.
- Separate what is known from what is assumed or missing.
- Produce the skill-specific artifact or review output.
- Surface coordination, quality, sequencing, or blocker risks explicitly.
- Recommend the next best handoff instead of trying to solve the whole lifecycle at once.
Quality gates
- The output is specific to the current iteration context.
- Risks, ambiguity, and dependencies are visible.
- Advice is actionable within a real team workflow.
- The result does not confuse commitment with aspiration.
Handoff targets
- story-splitting-advisor
- acceptance-driven-planner
- sprint-goal-writer
Output style
- Be explicit about tradeoffs and delivery risk.
- Prefer concise operational artifacts over long motivational prose.
- Surface evidence gaps instead of inventing certainty.
- Keep the result usable by engineers, leads, or PMs.
Failure modes to avoid
- Do not treat every backlog item as equally ready.
- Do not hide blocker or dependency risk.
- Do not reward ticket closure over outcome delivery.
- Do not confuse a retrospective observation with a validated root cause.
Minimum output skeleton
## Summary
## Findings
## Structured outputs
## Risks / blockers
## Open questions
## Recommended next skill
1---2name: backlog-groomer3description: backlog-groomer4---5# backlog-groomer67## Purpose8Review and refine backlog items for clarity, readiness, priority, sequencing, and hidden ambiguity before sprint commitment.910## Trigger this skill when11- The team is working in iterations, sprints, or short delivery cycles.12- Backlog items, sprint outcomes, or team process signals need structured review.13- You need clearer delivery discipline instead of vague “be more agile” advice.1415## Expected inputs16- backlog items17- business priority context18- dependencies19- known blockers20- team constraints2122## Deliverables23- groomed backlog view24- readiness assessment25- priority notes26- dependency flags27- items needing clarification2829## Operating procedure301. Clarify the delivery context, scope, and timebox.312. Separate what is known from what is assumed or missing.323. Produce the skill-specific artifact or review output.334. Surface coordination, quality, sequencing, or blocker risks explicitly.345. Recommend the next best handoff instead of trying to solve the whole lifecycle at once.3536## Quality gates37- The output is specific to the current iteration context.38- Risks, ambiguity, and dependencies are visible.39- Advice is actionable within a real team workflow.40- The result does not confuse commitment with aspiration.4142## Handoff targets43- story-splitting-advisor44- acceptance-driven-planner45- sprint-goal-writer4647## Output style48- Be explicit about tradeoffs and delivery risk.49- Prefer concise operational artifacts over long motivational prose.50- Surface evidence gaps instead of inventing certainty.51- Keep the result usable by engineers, leads, or PMs.5253## Failure modes to avoid54- Do not treat every backlog item as equally ready.55- Do not hide blocker or dependency risk.56- Do not reward ticket closure over outcome delivery.57- Do not confuse a retrospective observation with a validated root cause.5859## Minimum output skeleton60```md61## Summary62## Findings63## Structured outputs64## Risks / blockers65## Open questions66## Recommended next skill67```