Evaluate whether requirements are clear, feasible, testable, prioritised, and traceable.
Use when
a requirements set is nearing signoff
acceptance or implementation work depends on requirement quality
the team wants objective gates
Inputs
artifact or analysis output under review
source material and assumptions
project context and quality bar
Procedure
Inspect the artifact systematically.
Look for omissions, contradictions, weak assumptions, and vague language.
Distinguish evidence-backed claims from inference.
Record issues by severity.
Recommend targeted fixes, not generic criticism.
Re-state what would make the artifact review-ready.
Outputs
requirement quality assessment
ambiguous/non-testable items
prioritisation issues
traceability gaps
release readiness judgement
Guardrails
Be concrete.
Do not rewrite the whole artifact unless necessary.
Focus on the highest-leverage defects first.
Prefer explainable quality gates.
Completion criteria
key defects identified
fixes proposed
pass/fail or ready/not-ready decision given
1---2name: requirements-quality-check3description: Purpose4---5## Purpose6Evaluate whether requirements are clear, feasible, testable, prioritised, and traceable.78## Use when9- a requirements set is nearing signoff10- acceptance or implementation work depends on requirement quality11- the team wants objective gates1213## Inputs14- artifact or analysis output under review15- source material and assumptions16- project context and quality bar1718## Procedure191. Inspect the artifact systematically.202. Look for omissions, contradictions, weak assumptions, and vague language.213. Distinguish evidence-backed claims from inference.224. Record issues by severity.235. Recommend targeted fixes, not generic criticism.246. Re-state what would make the artifact review-ready.2526## Outputs27- requirement quality assessment28- ambiguous/non-testable items29- prioritisation issues30- traceability gaps31- release readiness judgement3233## Guardrails34- Be concrete.35- Do not rewrite the whole artifact unless necessary.36- Focus on the highest-leverage defects first.37- Prefer explainable quality gates.3839## Completion criteria40- key defects identified41- fixes proposed42- pass/fail or ready/not-ready decision given
Run npx skillmds@latest add 45ck/requirements-quality-check in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.
Purpose It is listed under Coding & Dev Tools on SkillMD.
This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.
This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.
Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free, and the skill stays under its author's original license.
45ck (@45ck) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.