Building investor and strategy decks plus the simple financial model behind them. Use when creating or critiquing a fundraising pitch, a board/strategy deck, or the unit-economics and revenue model that has to back it up. Covers the canonical slide arc and what each slide must prove, narrative principles, slide design do/don't, and a financial-modeling section — unit economics (CAC, LTV, payback, margin), revenue build, burn and runway, and how to sanity-check assumptions. Keywords pitch deck, investor deck, fundraising, slides, narrative, TAM SAM SOM, unit economics, CAC, LTV, runway, financial model.
A pitch deck sells one belief: that this team can turn this opportunity into an outsized
outcome. Every slide either advances that belief or wastes a slide. The deck tells the story;
the model proves it isn't fiction. Build both, and make them agree.
Core principle: a deck is a narrative, not a data dump. One idea per slide, the idea in the
headline, the slide as evidence for it. If a slide doesn't move the story forward, cut it.
The canonical deck arc (10–12 slides)
Order is a story: a problem worth solving → a solution that works → why it wins → why now →
how big → how it makes money → that it's already working → who's building it → the ask. Each
slide has a job — to prove something, not just state it.
#
Slide
What it must prove
1
Cover / one-liner
What you do, in plain language a stranger gets in 5 seconds
2
Problem
A real, painful, expensive problem — for a specific someone
3
Solution
Your product solves that problem; show it, don't describe it
4
Why now
A shift (tech, regulation, behavior, cost) that makes this possible/urgent today
5
Market (TAM/SAM/SOM)
The prize is big enough to matter, and built bottom-up not hand-waved
6
Product
It's real and differentiated — screenshots, demo, the "magic moment"
7
Business model
How you make money, what a customer is worth, that the unit math works
8
Traction
Evidence it's working — the single most persuasive slide if you have it
9
Go-to-market
A repeatable, affordable path to customers (not "we'll go viral")
10
Competition
You understand the landscape and have a defensible edge
11
Team
Why this team wins this — relevant, credible, complementary
12
The ask
How much, for what milestones, and what it buys the investor
Optional add-ons: vision/roadmap, financial summary, use-of-funds breakdown. Keep the core
to ~12; park detail in an appendix you pull up only if asked.
What each slide must actually do
Problem — make the audience feel the pain. Concrete, specific, quantified. Avoid "the
world is inefficient." Whose day is ruined, and how much does it cost them?
Why now — the most-skipped, most-powerful slide. What changed that makes this the moment?
No "why now," and you're a vitamin, not a painkiller.
Market — build bottom-up: (number of customers) × (price) = SOM, then widen to SAM
and TAM. Top-down "1% of a $50B market" reads as lazy and gets discounted.
Traction — show the line going up and to the right: revenue, users, retention, pipeline,
signed LOIs — whatever is most real. Pre-traction, show evidence of demand (waitlist,
pilots, design partners).
Competition — never claim "no competitors" (means no market or no homework). Use a 2×2
or feature matrix; be honest about where rivals are strong; then show your wedge.
The ask — specific number, the milestones it funds, and the runway it buys. Tie raise to
the next inflection (e.g. "to get to $1M ARR and a Series A").
Narrative & story principles
One idea per slide. If a slide makes two points, split it.
Headline = the takeaway, not the topic. "Revenue grew 4× in 12 months," not "Revenue."
A reader should get the deck from headlines alone.
Set up → tension → resolution. Problem creates tension; solution and traction resolve it.
Keep the arc; don't reorder into a feature catalog.
Concrete beats abstract. A named customer and a real number outsell adjectives.
Know your audience. Investor decks sell upside and defensibility; board/strategy decks
sell focus, risk, and the plan. Same facts, different emphasis.
The deck supports the talk — it isn't the script. Slides carry the visual evidence; you
carry the story.
Design do / don't
Do
One idea, one chart, lots of whitespace.
A headline that states the point; the body proves it.
Consistent fonts, colors, and number formatting throughout.
Charts over tables; a labeled trend line over a wall of figures.
Big, legible type — assume it's read on a phone or projected across a room.
Don't
Paragraphs. If it's a paragraph, it's a doc, not a slide.
Five messages and three charts fighting on one slide.
Jargon, buzzwords, and unexplained acronyms.
Tiny fonts, dense tables, or charts with no axis labels.
Decorative clip art and effects that add nothing.
Financial model — proving the story
The model behind the deck need not be elaborate, but it must be honest and internally
consistent. Investors probe the assumptions, not the spreadsheet's polish.
Unit economics (the heart of it)
Get these right before anything else — they decide whether growth creates value or burns it.
CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost) = total sales & marketing spend ÷ new customers acquired,
over the same period. Include all the spend, not just ad cost.
Gross margin = (revenue − cost of delivering it) ÷ revenue. The share of each dollar you
actually keep. Software is high (70–90%); services/hardware much lower.
LTV (Lifetime Value) = (average revenue per customer per period × gross margin) ÷ churn
rate. Using gross margin, not raw revenue, is what makes LTV honest.
LTV:CAC — a rule of thumb is ≥ 3:1. Below ~1:1 you lose money on every customer; far above
3:1 may mean you're underinvesting in growth.
CAC payback = CAC ÷ (monthly gross-margin revenue per customer). How many months to earn
the acquisition cost back. Under ~12 months is healthy for most businesses.
A minimal revenue build
Build revenue bottom-up from drivers, not a top-down "we'll hit $10M." Drivers you can
defend; a target you can only assert.
new customers/month × price (ARPU) = new revenue/month
+ retained customers (prior − churn) = recurring base
→ total revenue/month → quarter → year
Make the assumptions explicit and editable: acquisition rate, price, churn, expansion.
The whole model should flex when you change one input cell — that's how you stress-test it.
Burn & runway
Burn = monthly cash out − cash in (net burn). Track gross burn too if revenue is lumpy.
Runway = cash in bank ÷ monthly net burn = months until you're out of money.
Tie the raise to runway: a round should buy ~18–24 months to the next milestone, with a
buffer. State explicitly what the money achieves before you'd need to raise again.
Sanity-checking assumptions
Benchmark against reality — do your conversion, churn, and growth rates resemble
comparable companies, or do they imply you'll be the best ever? Justify outliers.
Bottom-up vs top-down — if your bottom-up build and your market slide imply wildly
different scale, one is wrong. Reconcile them.
One growth lever at a time — a model that needs CAC down and price up and churn down
and market share up simultaneously is a hope, not a plan.
Run a downside case — what if growth is half and CAC is double? If the company dies
instantly, the plan is too fragile. Show you've thought about it.
Cross-foot the numbers — totals add up, percentages have a base, units are consistent,
the cash on the model matches the runway you claim.
One-line description a stranger understands in 5 seconds
Problem is specific, painful, and quantified
Solution is shown (screenshot/demo), not just described
"Why now" names a concrete, recent shift
Market sized bottom-up; SOM realistic
Business model + unit economics on a slide (LTV:CAC, payback)
Traction slide leads with the strongest real number
GTM is repeatable and affordable, not "it'll go viral"
Competition acknowledged honestly; your edge is clear
Team slide answers "why you?"
Ask states amount, milestones funded, and runway bought
Every headline states a takeaway, readable on its own
Model assumptions are explicit, editable, and survive a downside case
Deck and model agree on the numbers
1---2name: pitch-deck3description: Building investor and strategy decks plus the simple financial model behind them. Use when creating or critiquing a fundraising pitch, a board/strategy deck, or the unit-economics and revenue model that has to back it up. Covers the canonical slide arc and what each slide must prove, narrative principles, slide design do/don't, and a financial-modeling section — unit economics (CAC, LTV, payback, margin), revenue build, burn and runway, and how to sanity-check assumptions. Keywords pitch deck, investor deck, fundraising, slides, narrative, TAM SAM SOM, unit economics, CAC, LTV, runway, financial model.4license: MIT5---67# Pitch Deck & Financial Model Guide89A pitch deck sells **one belief**: that this team can turn this opportunity into an outsized10outcome. Every slide either advances that belief or wastes a slide. The deck tells the story;11the model proves it isn't fiction. Build both, and make them agree.1213> Core principle: a deck is a narrative, not a data dump. One idea per slide, the idea in the14> headline, the slide as evidence for it. If a slide doesn't move the story forward, cut it.1516## The canonical deck arc (10–12 slides)1718Order is a story: a problem worth solving → a solution that works → why it wins → why now →19how big → how it makes money → that it's already working → who's building it → the ask. Each20slide has a job — to **prove** something, not just state it.2122| # | Slide | What it must prove |23|---|-------|--------------------|24| 1 | **Cover / one-liner** | What you do, in plain language a stranger gets in 5 seconds |25| 2 | **Problem** | A real, painful, expensive problem — for a specific someone |26| 3 | **Solution** | Your product solves *that* problem; show it, don't describe it |27| 4 | **Why now** | A shift (tech, regulation, behavior, cost) that makes this possible/urgent today |28| 5 | **Market (TAM/SAM/SOM)** | The prize is big enough to matter, and built bottom-up not hand-waved |29| 6 | **Product** | It's real and differentiated — screenshots, demo, the "magic moment" |30| 7 | **Business model** | How you make money, what a customer is worth, that the unit math works |31| 8 | **Traction** | Evidence it's working — the single most persuasive slide if you have it |32| 9 | **Go-to-market** | A repeatable, affordable path to customers (not "we'll go viral") |33| 10 | **Competition** | You understand the landscape and have a defensible edge |34| 11 | **Team** | Why *this* team wins this — relevant, credible, complementary |35| 12 | **The ask** | How much, for what milestones, and what it buys the investor |3637Optional add-ons: vision/roadmap, financial summary, use-of-funds breakdown. Keep the core38to ~12; park detail in an appendix you pull up only if asked.3940### What each slide must actually do4142- **Problem** — make the audience *feel* the pain. Concrete, specific, quantified. Avoid "the43 world is inefficient." Whose day is ruined, and how much does it cost them?44- **Why now** — the most-skipped, most-powerful slide. What changed that makes this the moment?45 No "why now," and you're a vitamin, not a painkiller.46- **Market** — build **bottom-up**: (number of customers) × (price) = SOM, then widen to SAM47 and TAM. Top-down "1% of a $50B market" reads as lazy and gets discounted.48- **Traction** — show the line going up and to the right: revenue, users, retention, pipeline,49 signed LOIs — whatever is most real. Pre-traction, show evidence of demand (waitlist,50 pilots, design partners).51- **Competition** — never claim "no competitors" (means no market or no homework). Use a 2×252 or feature matrix; be honest about where rivals are strong; then show your wedge.53- **The ask** — specific number, the milestones it funds, and the runway it buys. Tie raise to54 the *next* inflection (e.g. "to get to $1M ARR and a Series A").5556## Narrative & story principles5758- **One idea per slide.** If a slide makes two points, split it.59- **Headline = the takeaway, not the topic.** "Revenue grew 4× in 12 months," not "Revenue."60 A reader should get the deck from headlines alone.61- **Set up → tension → resolution.** Problem creates tension; solution and traction resolve it.62 Keep the arc; don't reorder into a feature catalog.63- **Concrete beats abstract.** A named customer and a real number outsell adjectives.64- **Know your audience.** Investor decks sell upside and defensibility; board/strategy decks65 sell focus, risk, and the plan. Same facts, different emphasis.66- **The deck supports the talk** — it isn't the script. Slides carry the visual evidence; you67 carry the story.6869## Design do / don't7071**Do**72- One idea, one chart, lots of whitespace.73- A headline that states the point; the body proves it.74- Consistent fonts, colors, and number formatting throughout.75- Charts over tables; a labeled trend line over a wall of figures.76- Big, legible type — assume it's read on a phone or projected across a room.7778**Don't**79- Paragraphs. If it's a paragraph, it's a doc, not a slide.80- Five messages and three charts fighting on one slide.81- Jargon, buzzwords, and unexplained acronyms.82- Tiny fonts, dense tables, or charts with no axis labels.83- Decorative clip art and effects that add nothing.8485## Financial model — proving the story8687The model behind the deck need not be elaborate, but it must be **honest and internally88consistent**. Investors probe the assumptions, not the spreadsheet's polish.8990### Unit economics (the heart of it)9192Get these right before anything else — they decide whether growth creates value or burns it.9394- **CAC** (Customer Acquisition Cost) = total sales & marketing spend ÷ new customers acquired,95 over the same period. Include *all* the spend, not just ad cost.96- **Gross margin** = (revenue − cost of delivering it) ÷ revenue. The share of each dollar you97 actually keep. Software is high (70–90%); services/hardware much lower.98- **LTV** (Lifetime Value) = (average revenue per customer per period × gross margin) ÷ churn99 rate. Using gross margin, not raw revenue, is what makes LTV honest.100- **LTV:CAC** — a rule of thumb is ≥ 3:1. Below ~1:1 you lose money on every customer; far above101 3:1 may mean you're underinvesting in growth.102- **CAC payback** = CAC ÷ (monthly gross-margin revenue per customer). How many months to earn103 the acquisition cost back. Under ~12 months is healthy for most businesses.104105### A minimal revenue build106107Build revenue **bottom-up** from drivers, not a top-down "we'll hit $10M." Drivers you can108defend; a target you can only assert.109110```111new customers/month × price (ARPU) = new revenue/month112 + retained customers (prior − churn) = recurring base113 → total revenue/month → quarter → year114```115116Make the **assumptions explicit and editable**: acquisition rate, price, churn, expansion.117The whole model should flex when you change one input cell — that's how you stress-test it.118119### Burn & runway120121- **Burn** = monthly cash out − cash in (net burn). Track gross burn too if revenue is lumpy.122- **Runway** = cash in bank ÷ monthly net burn = months until you're out of money.123- Tie the **raise to runway**: a round should buy ~18–24 months to the next milestone, with a124 buffer. State explicitly what the money achieves before you'd need to raise again.125126### Sanity-checking assumptions127128- **Benchmark against reality** — do your conversion, churn, and growth rates resemble129 comparable companies, or do they imply you'll be the best ever? Justify outliers.130- **Bottom-up vs top-down** — if your bottom-up build and your market slide imply wildly131 different scale, one is wrong. Reconcile them.132- **One growth lever at a time** — a model that needs CAC down *and* price up *and* churn down133 *and* market share up simultaneously is a hope, not a plan.134- **Run a downside case** — what if growth is half and CAC is double? If the company dies135 instantly, the plan is too fragile. Show you've thought about it.136- **Cross-foot the numbers** — totals add up, percentages have a base, units are consistent,137 the cash on the model matches the runway you claim.138139### Minimal model structure140141```142ASSUMPTIONS (one tab/block, every editable input lives here)143 starting customers, monthly new, price/ARPU, monthly churn %,144 gross margin %, CAC, fixed costs (payroll, infra, overhead), starting cash145146REVENUE BUILD (driven entirely by Assumptions)147 customers (begin + new − churned) → revenue → gross profit148149COSTS150 S&M (implies CAC × new customers) + R&D + G&A + fixed151152CASH / RUNWAY153 beginning cash + gross profit − costs = ending cash; net burn; months of runway154155DERIVED METRICS (auto-calculated, never typed in)156 CAC, LTV, LTV:CAC, payback months, gross margin, MoM growth157```158159## Slide-by-slide checklist160161- [ ] One-line description a stranger understands in 5 seconds162- [ ] Problem is specific, painful, and quantified163- [ ] Solution is shown (screenshot/demo), not just described164- [ ] "Why now" names a concrete, recent shift165- [ ] Market sized **bottom-up**; SOM realistic166- [ ] Business model + unit economics on a slide (LTV:CAC, payback)167- [ ] Traction slide leads with the strongest real number168- [ ] GTM is repeatable and affordable, not "it'll go viral"169- [ ] Competition acknowledged honestly; your edge is clear170- [ ] Team slide answers "why you?"171- [ ] Ask states amount, milestones funded, and runway bought172- [ ] Every headline states a takeaway, readable on its own173- [ ] Model assumptions are explicit, editable, and survive a downside case174- [ ] Deck and model agree on the numbers
Run npx skillmds@latest add 5dive-ai/pitch-deck in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.
Building investor and strategy decks plus the simple financial model behind them. Use when creating or critiquing a fundraising pitch, a board/strategy deck, or the unit-economics and revenue model that has to back it up. Covers the canonical slide arc and what each slide must prove, narrative principles, slide design do/don't, and a financial-modeling section — unit economics (CAC, LTV, payback, margin), revenue build, burn and runway, and how to sanity-check assumptions. Keywords pitch deck, investor deck, fundraising, slides, narrative, TAM SAM SOM, unit economics, CAC, LTV, runway, financial model. It is listed under AI & ML on SkillMD.
This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.
This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.
Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free. This skill is licensed under MIT.
5dive-ai (@5dive-ai) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.