Review

Review built feature/application output against the @adobe/data feature rules; report whether it is optimal and where any fix belongs. Read-only.

Adobe 3c45439 1.1 KB Updated 142 repo stars

File contents

Read the files under the given path and assess them against the relevant features/ rules (each layer's rule and the cross-cutting rules — namespace, data-modelling, type-casts, cohesion, …):

  • Correctness — does it typecheck and follow the layer's required shape?
  • Adherence — single public export per file, naming, the scope helpers (Database.components / resources / archetypes), satisfies targets, barrels, store-layer typing, etc.
  • Generality — no leaked type identities; follows the cross-cutting patterns.

Report either OPTIMAL, or a short list of issues. Tag each issue with where the root-cause fix belongs:

  • code — a one-off slip in the generated files (guidance is fine),
  • skill — the phase skill's instructions are unclear, wrong, or incomplete,
  • rule — a referenced rule is unclear, wrong, or missing guidance.

Do not edit anything — assessment only.

adobe/data/tree/main/packages/data-ai/skills/review commit 3c45439e88

Frequently asked questions

npx skillmds@latest add adobe/review