Lilarch
Use this workflow only after explicit selection as $lilarch or a
binding task instruction requiring it.
When to use
- The change is a small feature or improvement.
- The work should fit in 1-3 phases.
- The user wants the "little arch" workflow rather than the full arch plan.
When not to use
- The task is a migration, a broad refactor, or clearly larger than 3 phases.
- The user wants a compressed one-pass arch plan instead of a start/plan/finish flow. Use
arch-mini-plan. - The user wants the full arch workflow or the doc already behaves like a full-arch artifact. Use
miniarch-steporarch-step. - Investigation dominates because the root cause is unknown. Continue ordinary diagnosis within the user's scope; do not silently select another lifecycle.
Non-negotiables
- Keep one compact
DOC_PATHas the SSOT for the change. - Keep a compact Scope and Simplicity Contract in that doc: human outcome and
anchors, smallest sufficient solution, initial minimal convergence closure or
none, scope sign-off, enough proof, do-not-build boundary, and accepted residual risk. - Start and plan modes are docs-only. Code changes only happen in finish mode.
- Ask the small set of clarifying questions that must be answered before planning. Do not bulldoze past unresolved requirements.
- Keep the plan to 1-3 phases. If it grows beyond that, escalate instead of pretending the fit is still good.
- Initial architecture may include only the smallest evidenced same-contract convergence closure before plan mode declares readiness. Finish mode and self-review cannot expand it; later scope requires explicit human approval.
Localmeans the active host owns execution and integration; it does not require one conversation thread. The parent may use new clean same-host native children for genuinely independent repo mapping, plan or completion review, and non-overlapping low-collision implementation slices.- In Codex, start those clean children with
fork_turns: "none"; in Claude Code, use clean named or custom subagents rather than a conversation fork. Mapping and review children are read-only by capability when available and always receive explicit no-edit/no-write guidance. The parent records and rechecks repo state, owns doc/worklog updates, and integrates every return. - Give editful children explicit non-overlapping owner paths. Resume the exact implementer handle for authorized repair of its own slice; start an independent recheck as a new clean child. Children may use their own native sub-agents on their own host and may not start external agents; the parent's own fanout stays proportional to independent work, host slots, collision risk, and parent integration capacity.
- External review or work remains available when a concrete provider, load-bearing exact model/profile, lifecycle, isolation, automation, or receipt benefit is worth the extra process and integration cost. State that benefit when choosing the lane instead of treating external execution as the meaning of review freshness.
- When the changed behavior is agent- or LLM-driven, inspect prompt surfaces, native model capabilities, and existing tool/file/context exposure before designing.
- For agent-backed systems, prefer prompt engineering, grounding, and native-capability use before new harnesses, wrappers, parsers, OCR layers, or scripts.
- If the real lever is prompt repair, say so plainly and recommend
prompt-authoringinstead of inventing deterministic scaffolding. - When source material includes prompts, agent instructions, or other instruction-bearing doctrine, preserve explicit structure by default instead of silently condensing it.
- No runtime fallbacks or compatibility shims unless explicitly approved in the doc.
- Escalation out of lilarch defaults to
miniarch-step reformat, and then toarch-step reformatwhen the work is broader or more ambiguous than the faster full-arch tier.
First move
- Read
references/doc-contract.md. - Read
references/shared-doctrine.md. - Read
../_shared/scope-and-convergence.md. - Before creating or resuming another agent, read
../_shared/agent-orchestration-policy.md. - Resolve whether you are in:
- start mode
- plan mode
- finish mode
- Resolve
DOC_PATHand read it fully if it exists. - Check that the work still fits
lilarch. - Read the mode reference and
references/quality-bar.md.
Workflow
1) Start mode
- Create or repair the compact plan doc.
- Draft the North Star, requirements, non-requirements, defaults, and the small list of clarifying questions.
- Stop for answers if those questions are required to plan safely.
2) Plan mode
- Update the minimal research grounding.
- Write the current architecture, target architecture, call-site audit, and a 1-3 phase plan.
- Run the internal lilarch plan audit, directly or through a clean native read-only reviewer, and let the parent tighten the doc before implementation.
- Sign off the compact scope contract before entering finish mode.
3) Finish mode
- Implement under active-host ownership against the doc, optionally assigning clean native children only non-overlapping low-collision slices.
- Keep a lightweight
WORKLOG_PATH. - Self-audit for completeness and mark the doc complete only when the code is actually complete.
- Subtract unauthorized built scope; do not rewrite the compact doc to bless it.
Output expectations
- Update
DOC_PATHin every mode. - Update
WORKLOG_PATHduring finish mode. - Keep the console summary short and practical:
- North Star reminder
- punchline
- what changed
- blockers or remaining questions
- next action
Reference map
references/doc-contract.md- lilarch artifact, required blocks, status rules, worklog, and escalation rulesreferences/shared-doctrine.md- small-feature doctrine, question policy, and anti-fallback rules../_shared/agent-orchestration-policy.md- transport, context, continuation, isolation, topology, and return evidence for optional native or external child workreferences/start.md- create or repair the compact doc and lock requirements/defaultsreferences/plan.md- write the compact architecture blocks and 1-3 phase planreferences/finish.md- implement, keep the worklog honest, and self-auditreferences/quality-bar.md- strong vs weak requirements, plan, plan audit, and finish-mode completion bars