aoa-session-progression-lift
Intent
Use this skill to author a PROGRESSION_DELTA from reviewed evidence.
This is not score inflation.
It is an evidence-backed overlay that says what mastery axes moved, what should
hold or reanchor, and what small unlock hints are now safer.
Trigger boundary
Use this skill when:
- a reviewed session generated meaningful mastery evidence
- the route needs progression legibility without mutating source role profiles
- quest or RPG reflection would help continuation
- the output needs to stay small, evidence-backed, and multi-axis
Do not use this skill when:
- there is no reviewed evidence
- the request wants one global power number
- progression is being used as hidden routing policy
- the route is trying to mint authority rights without evidence
Inputs
- reviewed session artifact or harvest packet
- named evidence refs
- relevant role or cohort context if known
- existing progression baseline if available
Outputs
PROGRESSION_DELTA with axis movement, verdict, and optional unlock hints
- optional automation-readiness hint when reviewed evidence supports it
- optional rank reflection note if evidence is strong enough
- quest hooks or chronicle stub when useful
- negative or cautionary evidence when a hold, reanchor, or downgrade is more honest than advance
- one
PROGRESSION_DELTA_RECEIPT using references/stats-event-envelope.md
and references/progression-delta-receipt-schema.yaml
- one
CORE_SKILL_APPLICATION_RECEIPT using
references/core-skill-application-receipt-schema.yaml
Procedure
- collect reviewed evidence refs
- assess movement qualitatively across
boundary_integrity,
execution_reliability, change_legibility, review_sharpness,
proof_discipline, provenance_hygiene, and deep_readiness
- emit a verdict: advance, hold, reanchor, or downgrade
- name small unlock hints only when evidence supports them
- keep any automation-readiness hint small, descriptive, and non-authoritative
- allow negative, zero, and cautionary movement
- map ability or feat hints only as reflection, not as ownership transfer
- emit one
PROGRESSION_DELTA_RECEIPT when the delta closes, keeping the
receipt descriptive, evidence-linked, and smaller than the progression packet
- when the finish path closes, emit one
CORE_SKILL_APPLICATION_RECEIPT
that points back to the bounded progression receipt and records one
finished kernel-skill application
Contracts
- progression remains evidence-backed
- multi-axis only; no authoritative universal score
- rank labels are descriptive, not sovereign
- unlock hints must stay reviewable and small
- progression does not replace owner-layer truth or routing authority
- progression does not greenlight automation by itself
- progression receipts stay descriptive and append-only
- generic core receipts stay subordinate to the progression receipt and do not
become progression authority
- receipt corrections use
supersedes rather than silent overwrite
Risks and anti-patterns
- inventing progress from mood
- using progression as policy
- granting authority without cited evidence
- flattening multi-axis growth into one number
- confusing quest flavor with durable proof
- treating progression hints as if they were approval or schedule rights
- treating a progression receipt as if receipt emission itself proved growth
Verification
- confirm all meaningful axis claims cite reviewed evidence
- confirm the verdict matches the evidence
- confirm zero or negative movement remains allowed
- confirm unlock hints are small and explicit
- confirm no universal score is introduced
- confirm any emitted receipt stays multi-axis, evidence-linked, and non-sovereign
- confirm any emitted
CORE_SKILL_APPLICATION_RECEIPT points to the
progression detail receipt and stays finish-only
Technique traceability
Manifest-backed techniques:
- AOA-T-0084 from
8Dionysus/aoa-techniques at 5c6f0496edc3c2e74590baa35627c85fe58ef765 using path techniques/agent-workflows/progression-evidence-lift/TECHNIQUE.md and sections: Intent, Inputs, Outputs, Contracts, Validation
- AOA-T-0085 from
8Dionysus/aoa-techniques at 5c6f0496edc3c2e74590baa35627c85fe58ef765 using path techniques/agent-workflows/multi-axis-quest-overlay/TECHNIQUE.md and sections: Outputs, Risks, Validation
Adaptation points
Project overlays may add:
- local axis notes
- role-affinity hints
- local unlock classes
1---2name: aoa-session-progression-lift3description: Lift reviewed session evidence into a bounded multi-axis progression delta with explicit unlock hints, quest reflection cues, and no fake single-score authority. Use when a reviewed session produced meaningful mastery evidence and you need progression legibility without mutating source role profiles or routing authority. Do not use when there is no reviewed evidence, when the request wants one universal power number, or when progression language is being used as hidden policy.4license: Apache-2.05---6
7# aoa-session-progression-lift
8
9## Intent
10Use this skill to author a `PROGRESSION_DELTA` from reviewed evidence.
11
12This is not score inflation.
13It is an evidence-backed overlay that says what mastery axes moved, what should
14hold or reanchor, and what small unlock hints are now safer.
15
16## Trigger boundary
17Use this skill when:
18- a reviewed session generated meaningful mastery evidence
19- the route needs progression legibility without mutating source role profiles
20- quest or RPG reflection would help continuation
21- the output needs to stay small, evidence-backed, and multi-axis
22
23Do not use this skill when:
24- there is no reviewed evidence
25- the request wants one global power number
26- progression is being used as hidden routing policy
27- the route is trying to mint authority rights without evidence
28
29## Inputs
30- reviewed session artifact or harvest packet
31- named evidence refs
32- relevant role or cohort context if known
33- existing progression baseline if available
34
35## Outputs
36- `PROGRESSION_DELTA` with axis movement, verdict, and optional unlock hints
37- optional automation-readiness hint when reviewed evidence supports it
38- optional rank reflection note if evidence is strong enough
39- quest hooks or chronicle stub when useful
40- negative or cautionary evidence when a hold, reanchor, or downgrade is more honest than advance
41- one `PROGRESSION_DELTA_RECEIPT` using `references/stats-event-envelope.md`
42 and `references/progression-delta-receipt-schema.yaml`
43- one `CORE_SKILL_APPLICATION_RECEIPT` using
44 `references/core-skill-application-receipt-schema.yaml`
45
46## Procedure
471. collect reviewed evidence refs
482. assess movement qualitatively across `boundary_integrity`,
49 `execution_reliability`, `change_legibility`, `review_sharpness`,
50 `proof_discipline`, `provenance_hygiene`, and `deep_readiness`
513. emit a verdict: advance, hold, reanchor, or downgrade
524. name small unlock hints only when evidence supports them
535. keep any automation-readiness hint small, descriptive, and non-authoritative
546. allow negative, zero, and cautionary movement
557. map ability or feat hints only as reflection, not as ownership transfer
568. emit one `PROGRESSION_DELTA_RECEIPT` when the delta closes, keeping the
57 receipt descriptive, evidence-linked, and smaller than the progression packet
589. when the finish path closes, emit one `CORE_SKILL_APPLICATION_RECEIPT`
59 that points back to the bounded progression receipt and records one
60 finished kernel-skill application
61
62## Contracts
63- progression remains evidence-backed
64- multi-axis only; no authoritative universal score
65- rank labels are descriptive, not sovereign
66- unlock hints must stay reviewable and small
67- progression does not replace owner-layer truth or routing authority
68- progression does not greenlight automation by itself
69- progression receipts stay descriptive and append-only
70- generic core receipts stay subordinate to the progression receipt and do not
71 become progression authority
72- receipt corrections use `supersedes` rather than silent overwrite
73
74## Risks and anti-patterns
75- inventing progress from mood
76- using progression as policy
77- granting authority without cited evidence
78- flattening multi-axis growth into one number
79- confusing quest flavor with durable proof
80- treating progression hints as if they were approval or schedule rights
81- treating a progression receipt as if receipt emission itself proved growth
82
83## Verification
84- confirm all meaningful axis claims cite reviewed evidence
85- confirm the verdict matches the evidence
86- confirm zero or negative movement remains allowed
87- confirm unlock hints are small and explicit
88- confirm no universal score is introduced
89- confirm any emitted receipt stays multi-axis, evidence-linked, and non-sovereign
90- confirm any emitted `CORE_SKILL_APPLICATION_RECEIPT` points to the
91 progression detail receipt and stays finish-only
92
93## Technique traceability
94Manifest-backed techniques:
95- AOA-T-0084 from `8Dionysus/aoa-techniques` at `5c6f0496edc3c2e74590baa35627c85fe58ef765` using path `techniques/agent-workflows/progression-evidence-lift/TECHNIQUE.md` and sections: Intent, Inputs, Outputs, Contracts, Validation
96- AOA-T-0085 from `8Dionysus/aoa-techniques` at `5c6f0496edc3c2e74590baa35627c85fe58ef765` using path `techniques/agent-workflows/multi-axis-quest-overlay/TECHNIQUE.md` and sections: Outputs, Risks, Validation
97
98## Adaptation points
99Project overlays may add:
100- local axis notes
101- role-affinity hints
102- local unlock classes