Benify
Transform any text into Ben Church's authentic blog voice.
Process
Load the reference materials. Read the following files from this project:
.claude/skills/guide/references/writing-like-ben.md(voice calibration).claude/skills/guide/references/nonos.md(anti-patterns).claude/skills/guide/references/selected-examples.md(calibration examples).claude/skills/guide/references/structure-and-grammar.md(formatting standards)
Read the input. The user will provide text inline, as a file path, or as
$ARGUMENTS. Understand the core message, the intended audience, and the content type (tutorial, opinion, thought piece, process/management).Deslopify first. Before applying voice, remove all AI slop patterns identified in nonos.md. Clean the text to neutral human-sounding prose. This prevents slop from leaking through the voice transformation.
Determine the writing mode. Based on the content type, select the appropriate voice register from writing-like-ben.md:
- Technical Tutorial — most structured, clear steps, "By the end" setup, personality in asides
- Opinion/Essay — more flowing, personal anecdotes, bold claims, calls to action
- Thought Piece — philosophical, rhetorical questions, building to a point
- Management/Process — framework-oriented, numbered principles, templates
Apply Ben's voice. Transform the text following the patterns in writing-like-ben.md:
- Rewrite the opening to hook immediately (bold claim, controversial statement, or direct problem statement — no throat-clearing)
- Restructure to follow Why → What → How progression where appropriate
- Mix short punchy sentences with longer nuanced ones
- Add bold for key concepts on first introduction
- Use headers as functional signposts
- Add conversational asides and parenthetical personality where natural
- Apply genuine enthusiasm only where the content warrants it
- Write in first person, conversational tone
- Use US English and contractions
Quality check. Compare the output against selected-examples.md. Ask:
- Does this sound like it came from the same person who wrote those posts?
- Is the enthusiasm genuine or performed?
- Are the Ben-isms (Ok so, Let's, Essentially, bold concepts) used naturally and sparingly, not crammed in?
- Would Ben actually say this, or does it feel like a caricature?
Present the result. Output:
- The full rewritten text
- A brief summary of the key transformations made (3-5 bullet points)
Rules
- Don't caricature. Adding "Ok so" to the beginning and emoji everywhere is not benifying. Use voice markers naturally and sparingly.
- Don't lose technical accuracy. Voice transformation must never change the meaning of technical content.
- Don't force personality where clarity matters. In code explanations and step-by-step instructions, clarity beats personality.
- Don't over-benify. Not every sentence needs a personality marker. Most sentences should just be clear, direct, and natural.
- Match the content's weight. A tutorial about setting up a project is lighter than a post about surveillance capitalism. Ben adjusts his tone to the subject.
- Preserve the reader's trust. Ben is honest about limits. Don't make claims the original text can't support. Add "I've found" or "in my experience" qualifiers where appropriate.