You are in AUTONOMOUS MODE. Do NOT ask questions. Review every regulatory domain systematically.
TARGET:
$ARGUMENTS
If no arguments provided, review the entire financial services codebase in the current
working directory against all applicable regulations.
============================================================
PHASE 0: REGULATORY SCOPE DETECTION
Auto-detect the financial services scope:
BUSINESS MODEL DETECTION:
- Identify the type of financial service: banking, lending, payments, money transfer,
investment, insurance, cryptocurrency, BNPL, neobank, embedded finance
- Detect regulated activities: fund transfers, credit issuance, securities trading,
money transmission, deposit taking, insurance underwriting
- Identify jurisdictions from configuration, legal entities, or licensing references
- Determine applicable regulatory framework based on business model
TECH STACK:
- Identify web framework, database, ORM, message queues, third-party integrations
- Identify identity verification services (Jumio, Onfido, Alloy, Persona, Plaid Identity)
- Identify sanctions screening services (Dow Jones, Refinitiv, ComplyAdvantage, Chainalysis)
- Identify transaction monitoring systems (custom, Actimize, Featurespace, Unit21)
- Identify reporting systems (FinCEN filings, state reports, SAR/CTR generation)
Produce a regulatory applicability matrix before proceeding.
============================================================
PHASE 1: KYC / AML COMPLIANCE
Review Know Your Customer and Anti-Money Laundering implementation:
CUSTOMER IDENTIFICATION PROGRAM (CIP):
- Verify collection of required identification: name, date of birth, address, ID number
- Check identity verification against government databases or document verification
- Verify ID document validation (expiration, format, authenticity checks)
- Check for beneficial ownership collection for legal entities (25% threshold)
- Verify recordkeeping of identification information and verification methods
- Check for CIP exceptions handling (existing customers, regulated entities)
CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE (CDD):
- Verify risk rating assignment during onboarding (low, medium, high, prohibited)
- Check risk scoring factors: geography, product type, transaction volume, industry
- Verify ongoing monitoring adjusts risk rating based on activity
- Check for periodic re-verification schedules based on risk tier
- Verify CDD documentation retention (5-year minimum after account closure)
ENHANCED DUE DILIGENCE (EDD):
- Check for EDD triggers: high-risk customers, PEPs, high-risk jurisdictions
- Verify additional information collection for high-risk customers
- Check for source of funds / source of wealth verification
- Verify senior management approval for high-risk relationships
- Check for ongoing enhanced monitoring for EDD customers
SANCTIONS SCREENING:
- Verify OFAC SDN list screening on customer onboarding
- Check for ongoing sanctions screening (not just onboarding)
- Verify screening against all applicable lists (OFAC SDN, EU, UN, UK HMT)
- Check fuzzy matching logic and threshold configuration
- Verify match review workflow and false positive disposition
- Check for real-time screening on transactions (not just customer screening)
- Verify sanctions screening on counterparties and beneficiaries
TRANSACTION MONITORING:
- Check for suspicious activity detection rules
- Verify monitoring covers: structuring, rapid movement, unusual patterns, layering
- Check threshold calibration and tuning documentation
- Verify alert investigation workflow and escalation procedures
- Check for typology coverage (trade-based laundering, funnel accounts, etc.)
- Verify retroactive monitoring when customer risk changes
For each finding: regulatory reference, file path, severity, description, remediation.
============================================================
PHASE 2: BSA (BANK SECRECY ACT) COMPLIANCE
Review BSA-specific requirements:
SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY REPORTING:
- Verify SAR filing workflow exists for transactions > $5,000
- Check SAR narrative generation includes required elements (5 W's)
- Verify 30-day filing deadline tracking from initial detection
- Check for continuing activity SAR filing (90-day reviews)
- Verify SAR confidentiality (no tipping off)
- Check SAR data retention (5 years from filing)
CURRENCY TRANSACTION REPORTING:
- Verify CTR generation for cash transactions > $10,000
- Check for aggregate same-day cash transaction calculation
- Verify CTR e-filing integration with FinCEN BSA E-Filing
- Check for multiple transaction aggregation by customer
- Verify CTR exemption management for eligible businesses
RECORDKEEPING:
- Check that records of transactions > $3,000 are maintained
- Verify funds transfer recordkeeping (Travel Rule for transfers > $3,000)
- Check for 5-year retention of BSA records
- Verify records are retrievable within reasonable timeframe
- Check for purchase of monetary instruments > $3,000 records
BSA/AML PROGRAM ELEMENTS:
- Verify internal controls implementation in code
- Check for compliance officer designation references
- Verify training program references or requirements
- Check for independent audit/testing references
============================================================
PHASE 3: REGULATION E COMPLIANCE
Review electronic fund transfer compliance:
DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS:
- Check for initial disclosures on EFT service enrollment
- Verify terms and conditions include required Reg E disclosures
- Check for change-in-terms notification implementation
- Verify periodic statement generation with required elements
- Check for receipt generation on electronic transfers
ERROR RESOLUTION:
- Verify error resolution workflow exists with required timelines:
- 10 business days to investigate (20 for new accounts)
- Provisional credit within 10 days if investigation extends
- 45 calendar days maximum resolution (90 for certain transactions)
- Check that error reports trigger investigation workflow
- Verify consumer notification of investigation results
- Check for error correction and credit application logic
UNAUTHORIZED TRANSFERS:
- Verify unauthorized transfer liability limits:
- $0 if reported before transfer
- $50 if reported within 2 business days
- $500 if reported within 60 days of statement
- Unlimited after 60 days
- Check that liability calculation logic matches regulatory requirements
- Verify provisional credit implementation during investigation
- Check for fraud detection on consumer accounts
PREAUTHORIZED TRANSFERS:
- Check for consumer authorization requirements
- Verify stop payment capability and processing
- Check for notification of varying amount preauthorized transfers
- Verify right to stop payment is communicated
============================================================
PHASE 4: SOX (SARBANES-OXLEY) COMPLIANCE
Review financial reporting controls in code:
FINANCIAL REPORTING CONTROLS:
- Check for data validation on financial calculations and reports
- Verify calculation accuracy (rounding, currency conversion, accrual logic)
- Check for reconciliation processes between systems
- Verify financial data cannot be modified without audit trail
- Check for approval workflows on financial adjustments
AUDIT TRAIL:
- Verify all financial data changes are logged with actor, timestamp, before/after values
- Check for immutable audit logs (append-only, no deletion)
- Verify audit log retention meets requirements (7-year minimum for SOX)
- Check that audit logs capture both successful and failed operations
- Verify audit log integrity protection (hashing, tamper detection)
SEGREGATION OF DUTIES:
- Check for role separation in financial workflows:
- Initiator cannot approve their own transactions
- Administrator cannot process financial transactions
- Developers cannot deploy to production without approval
- Verify dual authorization for high-value operations
- Check for separation between transaction recording and reconciliation
- Verify access control enforces segregation in code
INTERNAL CONTROLS:
- Check for automated control points in financial processes
- Verify exception reporting when controls are bypassed
- Check for management override logging
- Verify control testing automation or hooks
============================================================
PHASE 5: GLBA (GRAMM-LEACH-BLILEY ACT) COMPLIANCE
Review privacy and data protection:
PRIVACY NOTICES:
- Check for initial privacy notice delivery on account opening
- Verify annual privacy notice distribution mechanism
- Check that privacy notice content includes required elements:
- Categories of information collected
- Categories of information disclosed
- Third parties receiving information
- Consumer opt-out rights
- Verify opt-out mechanism implementation and processing
- Check for revised privacy notice when practices change
DATA SHARING CONTROLS:
- Verify data sharing with third parties respects opt-out elections
- Check for data sharing agreements referenced in code
- Verify exceptions to opt-out requirements (joint marketing, service providers)
- Check for third-party data use restrictions enforcement
- Verify data sharing logging and tracking
SAFEGUARDS RULE:
- Check for access controls protecting customer financial information
- Verify encryption of customer data at rest and in transit
- Check for data loss prevention measures
- Verify employee access is limited to business need
- Check for security incident response procedures
- Verify vendor management for third-party access to customer data
============================================================
PHASE 6: STATE MONEY TRANSMITTER COMPLIANCE
Review state-level requirements:
LICENSE TRACKING:
- Check for state license tracking system or configuration
- Verify multi-state compliance (each state has different requirements)
- Check for license renewal tracking and alerting
- Verify surety bond amount tracking per state
STATE REPORTING:
- Check for state-specific reporting generation (quarterly, annual)
- Verify transaction volume reporting by state
- Check for complaint tracking and reporting mechanisms
- Verify state examination support (data export, record retrieval)
STATE-SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS:
- Check for state-specific transaction limits
- Verify state-specific disclosure requirements
- Check for state-specific refund policies (California, New York have specific rules)
- Verify state-specific record retention requirements
============================================================
SELF-HEALING VALIDATION (max 2 iterations)
After producing the review, validate completeness and consistency:
- Verify all required output sections are present and non-empty.
- Verify every finding references a specific file or code location.
- Verify recommendations are actionable (not vague).
- Verify severity ratings are justified by evidence.
IF VALIDATION FAILS:
- Identify which sections are incomplete or lack specificity
- Re-analyze the deficient areas
- Repeat up to 2 iterations
============================================================
OUTPUT
Financial Regulatory Compliance Review
System: [name/description]
Business Model: [detected financial service type]
Stack: [detected technologies]
Regulatory Applicability
| Regulation |
Applicable |
Reason |
| KYC/AML |
[YES/NO/PARTIAL] |
[reason] |
| BSA |
[YES/NO/PARTIAL] |
[reason] |
| Reg E |
[YES/NO/PARTIAL] |
[reason] |
| SOX |
[YES/NO/PARTIAL] |
[reason] |
| GLBA |
[YES/NO/PARTIAL] |
[reason] |
| State MTL |
[YES/NO/PARTIAL] |
[reason] |
Summary
| Regulation |
Status |
Findings |
Critical |
| KYC/AML |
[PASS/WARN/FAIL] |
N |
N |
| BSA |
[PASS/WARN/FAIL] |
N |
N |
| Reg E |
[PASS/WARN/FAIL] |
N |
N |
| SOX |
[PASS/WARN/FAIL] |
N |
N |
| GLBA |
[PASS/WARN/FAIL] |
N |
N |
| State MTL |
[PASS/WARN/FAIL] |
N |
N |
Detailed Findings
For each regulation with WARN or FAIL:
[Regulation Name]
| # |
Severity |
Reg Reference |
File |
Description |
Remediation |
Compliance Gap Analysis
- Missing workflows: [list of required but unimplemented regulatory workflows]
- Incomplete implementations: [list of partially implemented requirements]
- Documentation gaps: [list of missing required documentation]
Remediation Priority
[Ordered list by regulatory enforcement risk — KYC/AML and BSA first, then consumer protection]
============================================================
NEXT STEPS
After reviewing the compliance findings:
- "Run
/credit-risk to analyze credit decisioning models for fair lending compliance."
- "Run
/fraud-detection to evaluate transaction monitoring and SAR processes."
- "Run
/pci-dss to audit payment card data handling."
- "Run
/owasp to check security posture of financial APIs."
- "Run
/analyze to trace regulatory workflows end-to-end across the system."
============================================================
SELF-EVOLUTION TELEMETRY
After producing output, record execution metadata for the /evolve pipeline.
Check if a project memory directory exists:
- Look for the project path in
~/.claude/projects/
- If found, append to
skill-telemetry.md in that memory directory
Entry format:
### /financial-compliance — {{YYYY-MM-DD}}
- Outcome: {{SUCCESS | PARTIAL | FAILED}}
- Self-healed: {{yes — what was healed | no}}
- Iterations used: {{N}} / {{N max}}
- Bottleneck: {{phase that struggled or "none"}}
- Suggestion: {{one-line improvement idea for /evolve, or "none"}}
Only log if the memory directory exists. Skip silently if not found.
Keep entries concise — /evolve will parse these for skill improvement signals.
============================================================
DO NOT
- Do NOT modify any code — this is a review skill, not a remediation skill.
- Do NOT make definitive legal or compliance determinations — flag issues for legal review.
- Do NOT access or display actual customer data (PII, financial records, account numbers).
- Do NOT skip any regulatory domain — review all applicable regulations.
- Do NOT assume compliance based on the presence of a library — verify implementation.
- Do NOT conflate best practices with legal requirements — clearly label each.
- Do NOT provide jurisdiction-specific legal advice — note requirements and recommend legal counsel.
1---2name: financial-compliance3description: Audit fintech and financial services code for KYC/AML (CIP, CDD, EDD, sanctions screening, transaction monitoring), BSA (SAR/CTR filing, FinCEN reporting, Travel Rule), Reg E (EFT error resolution, unauthorized transfer liability, provisional credit), SOX (audit trails, segregation of duties, financial controls), GLBA (privacy notices, Safeguards Rule, data sharing), and state money transmitter licensing. Use when reviewing banking, payments, lending, crypto, neobank, BNPL, or embedded finance codebases.4---5
6You are in AUTONOMOUS MODE. Do NOT ask questions. Review every regulatory domain systematically.
7
8TARGET:
9$ARGUMENTS
10
11If no arguments provided, review the entire financial services codebase in the current
12working directory against all applicable regulations.
13
14============================================================
15PHASE 0: REGULATORY SCOPE DETECTION
16============================================================
17
18Auto-detect the financial services scope:
19
20BUSINESS MODEL DETECTION:
21- Identify the type of financial service: banking, lending, payments, money transfer,
22 investment, insurance, cryptocurrency, BNPL, neobank, embedded finance
23- Detect regulated activities: fund transfers, credit issuance, securities trading,
24 money transmission, deposit taking, insurance underwriting
25- Identify jurisdictions from configuration, legal entities, or licensing references
26- Determine applicable regulatory framework based on business model
27
28TECH STACK:
29- Identify web framework, database, ORM, message queues, third-party integrations
30- Identify identity verification services (Jumio, Onfido, Alloy, Persona, Plaid Identity)
31- Identify sanctions screening services (Dow Jones, Refinitiv, ComplyAdvantage, Chainalysis)
32- Identify transaction monitoring systems (custom, Actimize, Featurespace, Unit21)
33- Identify reporting systems (FinCEN filings, state reports, SAR/CTR generation)
34
35Produce a regulatory applicability matrix before proceeding.
36
37============================================================
38PHASE 1: KYC / AML COMPLIANCE
39============================================================
40
41Review Know Your Customer and Anti-Money Laundering implementation:
42
43CUSTOMER IDENTIFICATION PROGRAM (CIP):
44- Verify collection of required identification: name, date of birth, address, ID number
45- Check identity verification against government databases or document verification
46- Verify ID document validation (expiration, format, authenticity checks)
47- Check for beneficial ownership collection for legal entities (25% threshold)
48- Verify recordkeeping of identification information and verification methods
49- Check for CIP exceptions handling (existing customers, regulated entities)
50
51CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE (CDD):
52- Verify risk rating assignment during onboarding (low, medium, high, prohibited)
53- Check risk scoring factors: geography, product type, transaction volume, industry
54- Verify ongoing monitoring adjusts risk rating based on activity
55- Check for periodic re-verification schedules based on risk tier
56- Verify CDD documentation retention (5-year minimum after account closure)
57
58ENHANCED DUE DILIGENCE (EDD):
59- Check for EDD triggers: high-risk customers, PEPs, high-risk jurisdictions
60- Verify additional information collection for high-risk customers
61- Check for source of funds / source of wealth verification
62- Verify senior management approval for high-risk relationships
63- Check for ongoing enhanced monitoring for EDD customers
64
65SANCTIONS SCREENING:
66- Verify OFAC SDN list screening on customer onboarding
67- Check for ongoing sanctions screening (not just onboarding)
68- Verify screening against all applicable lists (OFAC SDN, EU, UN, UK HMT)
69- Check fuzzy matching logic and threshold configuration
70- Verify match review workflow and false positive disposition
71- Check for real-time screening on transactions (not just customer screening)
72- Verify sanctions screening on counterparties and beneficiaries
73
74TRANSACTION MONITORING:
75- Check for suspicious activity detection rules
76- Verify monitoring covers: structuring, rapid movement, unusual patterns, layering
77- Check threshold calibration and tuning documentation
78- Verify alert investigation workflow and escalation procedures
79- Check for typology coverage (trade-based laundering, funnel accounts, etc.)
80- Verify retroactive monitoring when customer risk changes
81
82For each finding: regulatory reference, file path, severity, description, remediation.
83
84============================================================
85PHASE 2: BSA (BANK SECRECY ACT) COMPLIANCE
86============================================================
87
88Review BSA-specific requirements:
89
90SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY REPORTING:
91- Verify SAR filing workflow exists for transactions > $5,000
92- Check SAR narrative generation includes required elements (5 W's)
93- Verify 30-day filing deadline tracking from initial detection
94- Check for continuing activity SAR filing (90-day reviews)
95- Verify SAR confidentiality (no tipping off)
96- Check SAR data retention (5 years from filing)
97
98CURRENCY TRANSACTION REPORTING:
99- Verify CTR generation for cash transactions > $10,000
100- Check for aggregate same-day cash transaction calculation
101- Verify CTR e-filing integration with FinCEN BSA E-Filing
102- Check for multiple transaction aggregation by customer
103- Verify CTR exemption management for eligible businesses
104
105RECORDKEEPING:
106- Check that records of transactions > $3,000 are maintained
107- Verify funds transfer recordkeeping (Travel Rule for transfers > $3,000)
108- Check for 5-year retention of BSA records
109- Verify records are retrievable within reasonable timeframe
110- Check for purchase of monetary instruments > $3,000 records
111
112BSA/AML PROGRAM ELEMENTS:
113- Verify internal controls implementation in code
114- Check for compliance officer designation references
115- Verify training program references or requirements
116- Check for independent audit/testing references
117
118============================================================
119PHASE 3: REGULATION E COMPLIANCE
120============================================================
121
122Review electronic fund transfer compliance:
123
124DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS:
125- Check for initial disclosures on EFT service enrollment
126- Verify terms and conditions include required Reg E disclosures
127- Check for change-in-terms notification implementation
128- Verify periodic statement generation with required elements
129- Check for receipt generation on electronic transfers
130
131ERROR RESOLUTION:
132- Verify error resolution workflow exists with required timelines:
133 - 10 business days to investigate (20 for new accounts)
134 - Provisional credit within 10 days if investigation extends
135 - 45 calendar days maximum resolution (90 for certain transactions)
136- Check that error reports trigger investigation workflow
137- Verify consumer notification of investigation results
138- Check for error correction and credit application logic
139
140UNAUTHORIZED TRANSFERS:
141- Verify unauthorized transfer liability limits:
142 - $0 if reported before transfer
143 - $50 if reported within 2 business days
144 - $500 if reported within 60 days of statement
145 - Unlimited after 60 days
146- Check that liability calculation logic matches regulatory requirements
147- Verify provisional credit implementation during investigation
148- Check for fraud detection on consumer accounts
149
150PREAUTHORIZED TRANSFERS:
151- Check for consumer authorization requirements
152- Verify stop payment capability and processing
153- Check for notification of varying amount preauthorized transfers
154- Verify right to stop payment is communicated
155
156============================================================
157PHASE 4: SOX (SARBANES-OXLEY) COMPLIANCE
158============================================================
159
160Review financial reporting controls in code:
161
162FINANCIAL REPORTING CONTROLS:
163- Check for data validation on financial calculations and reports
164- Verify calculation accuracy (rounding, currency conversion, accrual logic)
165- Check for reconciliation processes between systems
166- Verify financial data cannot be modified without audit trail
167- Check for approval workflows on financial adjustments
168
169AUDIT TRAIL:
170- Verify all financial data changes are logged with actor, timestamp, before/after values
171- Check for immutable audit logs (append-only, no deletion)
172- Verify audit log retention meets requirements (7-year minimum for SOX)
173- Check that audit logs capture both successful and failed operations
174- Verify audit log integrity protection (hashing, tamper detection)
175
176SEGREGATION OF DUTIES:
177- Check for role separation in financial workflows:
178 - Initiator cannot approve their own transactions
179 - Administrator cannot process financial transactions
180 - Developers cannot deploy to production without approval
181- Verify dual authorization for high-value operations
182- Check for separation between transaction recording and reconciliation
183- Verify access control enforces segregation in code
184
185INTERNAL CONTROLS:
186- Check for automated control points in financial processes
187- Verify exception reporting when controls are bypassed
188- Check for management override logging
189- Verify control testing automation or hooks
190
191============================================================
192PHASE 5: GLBA (GRAMM-LEACH-BLILEY ACT) COMPLIANCE
193============================================================
194
195Review privacy and data protection:
196
197PRIVACY NOTICES:
198- Check for initial privacy notice delivery on account opening
199- Verify annual privacy notice distribution mechanism
200- Check that privacy notice content includes required elements:
201 - Categories of information collected
202 - Categories of information disclosed
203 - Third parties receiving information
204 - Consumer opt-out rights
205- Verify opt-out mechanism implementation and processing
206- Check for revised privacy notice when practices change
207
208DATA SHARING CONTROLS:
209- Verify data sharing with third parties respects opt-out elections
210- Check for data sharing agreements referenced in code
211- Verify exceptions to opt-out requirements (joint marketing, service providers)
212- Check for third-party data use restrictions enforcement
213- Verify data sharing logging and tracking
214
215SAFEGUARDS RULE:
216- Check for access controls protecting customer financial information
217- Verify encryption of customer data at rest and in transit
218- Check for data loss prevention measures
219- Verify employee access is limited to business need
220- Check for security incident response procedures
221- Verify vendor management for third-party access to customer data
222
223============================================================
224PHASE 6: STATE MONEY TRANSMITTER COMPLIANCE
225============================================================
226
227Review state-level requirements:
228
229LICENSE TRACKING:
230- Check for state license tracking system or configuration
231- Verify multi-state compliance (each state has different requirements)
232- Check for license renewal tracking and alerting
233- Verify surety bond amount tracking per state
234
235STATE REPORTING:
236- Check for state-specific reporting generation (quarterly, annual)
237- Verify transaction volume reporting by state
238- Check for complaint tracking and reporting mechanisms
239- Verify state examination support (data export, record retrieval)
240
241STATE-SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS:
242- Check for state-specific transaction limits
243- Verify state-specific disclosure requirements
244- Check for state-specific refund policies (California, New York have specific rules)
245- Verify state-specific record retention requirements
246
247
248============================================================
249SELF-HEALING VALIDATION (max 2 iterations)
250============================================================
251
252After producing the review, validate completeness and consistency:
253
2541. Verify all required output sections are present and non-empty.
2552. Verify every finding references a specific file or code location.
2563. Verify recommendations are actionable (not vague).
2574. Verify severity ratings are justified by evidence.
258
259IF VALIDATION FAILS:
260- Identify which sections are incomplete or lack specificity
261- Re-analyze the deficient areas
262- Repeat up to 2 iterations
263
264============================================================
265OUTPUT
266============================================================
267
268## Financial Regulatory Compliance Review
269
270**System:** [name/description]
271**Business Model:** [detected financial service type]
272**Stack:** [detected technologies]
273
274### Regulatory Applicability
275
276| Regulation | Applicable | Reason |
277|------------|-----------|--------|
278| KYC/AML | [YES/NO/PARTIAL] | [reason] |
279| BSA | [YES/NO/PARTIAL] | [reason] |
280| Reg E | [YES/NO/PARTIAL] | [reason] |
281| SOX | [YES/NO/PARTIAL] | [reason] |
282| GLBA | [YES/NO/PARTIAL] | [reason] |
283| State MTL | [YES/NO/PARTIAL] | [reason] |
284
285### Summary
286
287| Regulation | Status | Findings | Critical |
288|------------|--------|----------|----------|
289| KYC/AML | [PASS/WARN/FAIL] | N | N |
290| BSA | [PASS/WARN/FAIL] | N | N |
291| Reg E | [PASS/WARN/FAIL] | N | N |
292| SOX | [PASS/WARN/FAIL] | N | N |
293| GLBA | [PASS/WARN/FAIL] | N | N |
294| State MTL | [PASS/WARN/FAIL] | N | N |
295
296### Detailed Findings
297
298For each regulation with WARN or FAIL:
299
300#### [Regulation Name]
301
302| # | Severity | Reg Reference | File | Description | Remediation |
303|---|----------|---------------|------|-------------|-------------|
304
305### Compliance Gap Analysis
306- **Missing workflows:** [list of required but unimplemented regulatory workflows]
307- **Incomplete implementations:** [list of partially implemented requirements]
308- **Documentation gaps:** [list of missing required documentation]
309
310### Remediation Priority
311[Ordered list by regulatory enforcement risk — KYC/AML and BSA first, then consumer protection]
312
313============================================================
314NEXT STEPS
315============================================================
316
317After reviewing the compliance findings:
318- "Run `/credit-risk` to analyze credit decisioning models for fair lending compliance."
319- "Run `/fraud-detection` to evaluate transaction monitoring and SAR processes."
320- "Run `/pci-dss` to audit payment card data handling."
321- "Run `/owasp` to check security posture of financial APIs."
322- "Run `/analyze` to trace regulatory workflows end-to-end across the system."
323
324
325============================================================
326SELF-EVOLUTION TELEMETRY
327============================================================
328
329After producing output, record execution metadata for the /evolve pipeline.
330
331Check if a project memory directory exists:
332- Look for the project path in `~/.claude/projects/`
333- If found, append to `skill-telemetry.md` in that memory directory
334
335Entry format:
336```
337### /financial-compliance — {{YYYY-MM-DD}}
338- Outcome: {{SUCCESS | PARTIAL | FAILED}}
339- Self-healed: {{yes — what was healed | no}}
340- Iterations used: {{N}} / {{N max}}
341- Bottleneck: {{phase that struggled or "none"}}
342- Suggestion: {{one-line improvement idea for /evolve, or "none"}}
343```
344
345Only log if the memory directory exists. Skip silently if not found.
346Keep entries concise — /evolve will parse these for skill improvement signals.
347
348============================================================
349DO NOT
350============================================================
351
352- Do NOT modify any code — this is a review skill, not a remediation skill.
353- Do NOT make definitive legal or compliance determinations — flag issues for legal review.
354- Do NOT access or display actual customer data (PII, financial records, account numbers).
355- Do NOT skip any regulatory domain — review all applicable regulations.
356- Do NOT assume compliance based on the presence of a library — verify implementation.
357- Do NOT conflate best practices with legal requirements — clearly label each.
358- Do NOT provide jurisdiction-specific legal advice — note requirements and recommend legal counsel.