Full Review

Full Code Review

Orchestrates all available review skills to provide comprehensive code analysis.

When to Use

• Before committing code changes
• Performing pre-merge reviews
• Running comprehensive audits
• Checking code against all quality standards
• Validating changes across the full stack

Workflow

Step 1: Identify Changes

Get list of changed files using git diff.

Step 2: Map Skills to Files

Invoke relevant skills based on file patterns.

Step 3: Run Checklists

Apply security, DeFi, type safety, and performance checks.

Step 4: Generate Report

Produce structured report with severity levels.

Step 5: Auto-Fix (Optional)

Offer to fix critical issues automatically.

Trigger Phrases

• "review code", "check changes", "full review"
• "pre-commit review", "review before commit"
• "run all skills", "comprehensive review"

Review Process

Step 1: Identify Changes

# Get changed files
git diff --name-only HEAD~1 2>/dev/null || git diff --name-only
git status --porcelain

Step 2: Skill Mapping

Based on changed files, invoke these skills:

Step 3: Review Checklist

For EVERY review, check these critical items:

Security

• No SQL injection vulnerabilities
• No XSS in React components (dangerouslySetInnerHTML)
• No command injection in Bash calls
• No hardcoded secrets/credentials
• Proper input validation on all endpoints
• Rate limiting on sensitive routes

DeFi-Specific

• Token decimals correct (USDC/USDT=6, WBTC=8, ETH=18)
• Token addresses in checksum format
• BigInt handling (no precision loss with Number())
• Slippage protection on swaps
• Proper error handling for reverts

Type Safety

• No as any type assertions
• Types match across TypeScript ↔ Rust ↔ PostgreSQL
• Zod schemas for all API inputs
• Proper null/undefined handling

Performance

• No N+1 queries
• Proper indexing on queried columns
• Timeouts on external calls
• Connection pooling configured

Code Quality

• Error messages don't leak internal details
• Consistent naming conventions
• No dead code or unused imports
• Proper async/await usage

TanStack Query (if applicable)

• QueryKeys use full URL paths
• Mutations invalidate relevant queries
• Using isPending (not isLoading) for mutations in v5
• Responses typed with schema types

Drizzle ORM (if applicable)

• No primary key type changes
• Array columns use text().array() syntax
• Insert/select types exported for models
• Using drizzle-zod for validation

React Components (if applicable)

• Loading/error states handled
• data-testid on interactive elements
• Using router Link, not window.location
• Helper functions defined before use

Blockchain/RPC (if applicable)

• All contract calls wrapped in try/catch
• Multicall uses allowFailure: true
• Prices validated against expected ranges
• Handling "execution reverted" gracefully

Step 4: Report Format

## Code Review Report

### Files Reviewed
- [list files]

### Skills Applied
- [list skills invoked]

### Critical Issues (MUST FIX)
🔴 [issue description]
   File: path/to/file.ts:line
   Fix: [how to fix]

### Warnings (SHOULD FIX)
🟡 [issue description]
   File: path/to/file.ts:line
   Suggestion: [recommendation]

### Suggestions (NICE TO HAVE)
🟢 [improvement idea]

### Summary
- Critical: X issues
- Warnings: X issues
- Suggestions: X items
- Ready to commit: Yes/No

Step 5: Auto-Fix

If critical issues found, offer to fix them:

1. Show the issue
2. Show the proposed fix
3. Apply if approved
4. Re-run validation

Quick Commands

• /review - Full review of all changes
• /quick-review - Fast check of critical issues only
• Invoke full-review skill for this comprehensive process