alaimo-labs /critique-spec
Run a persona critique panel over a document, following the persona-critique skill.
Input: $ARGUMENTS
Workflow
Resolve the document. A file path (look in
product/specs/first), pasted content, or an idea described inline. If nothing resolvable, ask.Resolve the panel. Named personas from
product/personas/, or all of them by default (cap at 4 — if more exist, propose the 4 most relevant to this document and let the user adjust). If none exist, suggest/generate-personas. State the panel's type mix in one line ("2 primary, 1 tertiary, 1 negative"). A panel of onlyprimarypersonas returns a complacent reading: when the document has purchase, permission, or scope implications, propose adding at least onetertiaryornegative— and if none exists, suggest/generate-personasfor the gap in one line. A persona without atype:line gets one proposed from its content, written into the file only with the user's approval.Critique. Each persona reviews the document in character per the
persona-critiqueskill: rating, strengths, concerns, suggestions — honest, literacy-aware, in the document's language.Synthesize as the researcher: agreements, conflicts (design tensions), and the 2–3 highest-impact changes.
Save to
product/insights/{YYYY-MM-DD-HHMM}-critique-{spec-slug}.mdand offer the natural next step in one line (e.g., revise the spec, or slice it with/slice-feature).