/phase-plan
Take an existing flat or unstructured plan and restructure it into phased execution. Add /verify gates after each phase and critical outcome. Add blocking gates before actions whose safety prerequisites must already be true.
Structured execution spec: protocol.yon. Read it for the canonical rules and step sequence; this file is explanation. The two must stay in sync — if you edit one, update the other and refresh the @STAMP date.
Plan Restructuring Protocol — transforms any plan into a gated, phased structure for structural legibility and explicit checkpointing. Restructure, never delete. All original content is preserved.
What is /verify?
/verify is a verification gate — a point where execution stops and the current state is validated before proceeding. When you encounter a /verify gate in a restructured plan:
- Review what the gate specifies
- Verify each condition is met
- Only continue to the next phase/step once the gate passes
If /verify is not a recognized command in your session, replace it with an explicit user confirmation prompt: pause, state what you're verifying, and wait for the user to confirm before continuing.
A /verify gate may sit before or after an action. It must block before mutation when it proves a prerequisite whose absence would make the action unsafe. Examples include authorization, no-follow target resolution, backup or readback readiness, live-data scope, and destructive-target confirmation. Retain a separate gate after the action to verify the intended outcome.
Phase 1 — Locate & Load Existing Plan
- Find the plan — check
implementation_plan.md, PLAN.md, task.md, recent conversation context, or user-provided file. Load the full content. If multiple candidates exist, use the most recently modified file and note the choice.
- Assess structure — flat (single list)? Partially phased? Missing verification steps? Identify structural gaps.
If no plan is found after checking all locations → stop. Ask the user to provide the plan before continuing.
Phase 2 — Decompose Into Phases
- Identify natural phase boundaries — group related steps by dependency order, component, or concern. Each phase must be independently verifiable. Mark critical steps that need individual
/verify gates.
- Define phases — each phase needs:
- Clear name
- Goal / deliverable
- Ordered steps
- Success criteria
Ensure phases flow logically — dependencies before dependents.
Phase 3 — Insert Check Gates
Phase-level gates — insert a /verify gate after every phase. Gate focus must be specific to what that phase accomplished and what the next phase depends on.
Critical step gates — identify steps within phases that warrant individual /verify gates:
- Risky operations
- Breaking changes
- Schema migrations
- Cross-package impacts
- Security-sensitive changes
For each critical step, place any safety-prerequisite /verify gate before the step, then place an outcome /verify gate immediately after it.
Gate Quality Reference
A gate must validate something observable. If it can't fail, it's ceremonial.
|
Example |
| Good gate |
/verify — migration applied: users.email column is non-null, existing rows have values, no FK errors in test suite |
| Bad gate |
/verify — make sure the migration looks right |
The bad gate has no observable condition. The good gate has three specific pass/fail criteria a different person could verify independently.
Gate Placement Rules
- MUST insert a
/verify gate after completing any phase
- MUST insert a blocking pre-action
/verify gate when authorization, no-follow target proof, backup or readback readiness, live-data scope, destructive-target confirmation, or another safety prerequisite must be established before mutation
- MUST retain a separate post-action
/verify gate for the operation's outcome; a safety prerequisite cannot be validated only after the action
- MUST insert an inline post-action
/verify gate after any schema migration, breaking change, or security-sensitive step
- MUST insert an inline
/verify gate after any step with cross-package impact
- SHOULD split phases with >5 steps into sub-phases with intermediate
/verify gates
Phase 4 — Rewrite & Output
- Rewrite the plan — in its original format (
implementation_plan.md, PLAN.md, or task.md) with the new phased structure. Preserve all original content — restructure, do not delete. Each phase should clearly show: steps, /verify gate, and what the gate validates. If the plan has no source file (existed only in conversation context), output the full restructured plan as a fenced code block in the response instead.
- Diff report — summarize what changed: how many phases created, how many
/verify gates added, any steps reordered or split.
Rules
- MUST preserve ALL original plan content — restructure, never delete
- MUST maintain original intent and goal alignment
- MUST use the same file format as the original plan
- MUST NOT add new scope or features not in the original plan
- MUST NOT create ceremonial
/verify gates with vague focus
Next Steps
/plan-execute — implement the newly phased plan
/double-check — verify the restructured plan before executing
Human output. This skill's handler-facing output obeys the human-output
contract (human-output/SKILL.md).
Next skills. On completion, run the Next Skills protocol (next-skills/SKILL.md): surface the next-skills recommendations from front-matter for the caller to pick. Offer only — never auto-invoke.
Self-improvement. On completion, run the Self-Improvement Protocol (self-improve/SKILL.md): if this run surfaced a concrete, blocking-or-recurring weakness in this skill, propose a specific fix for the handler to approve. Conservative — silent otherwise. Never auto-apply.
1---2name: plan-phases3description: Restructure an existing plan into phases with /verify gates after each phase and critical outcomes, plus blocking pre-action gates for safety prerequisites. Trigger when the user runs /phase-plan or asks to "add phases to this plan", "gate this plan", "restructure the plan", or "add checkpoints". Use plan-create for new plans and plan-deep-dive for inspection without restructuring.4---56# /phase-plan78Take an existing flat or unstructured plan and restructure it into phased execution. Add `/verify` gates after each phase and critical outcome. Add blocking gates before actions whose safety prerequisites must already be true.910> **Structured execution spec:** [`protocol.yon`](protocol.yon). Read it for the canonical rules and step sequence; this file is explanation. The two must stay in sync — if you edit one, update the other and refresh the `@STAMP` date.1112> **Plan Restructuring Protocol — transforms any plan into a gated, phased structure for structural legibility and explicit checkpointing.** Restructure, never delete. All original content is preserved.1314## What is `/verify`?1516`/verify` is a verification gate — a point where execution stops and the current state is validated before proceeding. When you encounter a `/verify` gate in a restructured plan:17181. Review what the gate specifies192. Verify each condition is met203. Only continue to the next phase/step once the gate passes2122If `/verify` is not a recognized command in your session, replace it with an explicit user confirmation prompt: pause, state what you're verifying, and wait for the user to confirm before continuing.2324A `/verify` gate may sit before or after an action. It must block **before** mutation when it proves a prerequisite whose absence would make the action unsafe. Examples include authorization, no-follow target resolution, backup or readback readiness, live-data scope, and destructive-target confirmation. Retain a separate gate **after** the action to verify the intended outcome.2526## Phase 1 — Locate & Load Existing Plan27281. **Find the plan** — check `implementation_plan.md`, `PLAN.md`, `task.md`, recent conversation context, or user-provided file. Load the full content. If multiple candidates exist, use the most recently modified file and note the choice.292. **Assess structure** — flat (single list)? Partially phased? Missing verification steps? Identify structural gaps.3031**If no plan is found** after checking all locations → stop. Ask the user to provide the plan before continuing.3233## Phase 2 — Decompose Into Phases34351. **Identify natural phase boundaries** — group related steps by dependency order, component, or concern. Each phase must be independently verifiable. Mark critical steps that need individual `/verify` gates.362. **Define phases** — each phase needs:37 - Clear name38 - Goal / deliverable39 - Ordered steps40 - Success criteria4142Ensure phases flow logically — dependencies before dependents.4344## Phase 3 — Insert Check Gates45461. **Phase-level gates** — insert a `/verify` gate **after every phase**. Gate focus must be specific to what that phase accomplished and what the next phase depends on.472. **Critical step gates** — identify steps within phases that warrant individual `/verify` gates:48 - Risky operations49 - Breaking changes50 - Schema migrations51 - Cross-package impacts52 - Security-sensitive changes5354 For each critical step, place any safety-prerequisite `/verify` gate before the step, then place an outcome `/verify` gate immediately after it.5556### Gate Quality Reference5758A gate must validate something observable. If it can't fail, it's ceremonial.5960| | Example |61|-|---------|62| **Good gate** | `/verify` — migration applied: `users.email` column is non-null, existing rows have values, no FK errors in test suite |63| **Bad gate** | `/verify` — make sure the migration looks right |6465The bad gate has no observable condition. The good gate has three specific pass/fail criteria a different person could verify independently.6667### Gate Placement Rules6869- MUST insert a `/verify` gate after completing any phase70- MUST insert a blocking pre-action `/verify` gate when authorization, no-follow target proof, backup or readback readiness, live-data scope, destructive-target confirmation, or another safety prerequisite must be established before mutation71- MUST retain a separate post-action `/verify` gate for the operation's outcome; a safety prerequisite cannot be validated only after the action72- MUST insert an inline post-action `/verify` gate after any schema migration, breaking change, or security-sensitive step73- MUST insert an inline `/verify` gate after any step with cross-package impact74- SHOULD split phases with >5 steps into sub-phases with intermediate `/verify` gates7576## Phase 4 — Rewrite & Output77781. **Rewrite the plan** — in its original format (`implementation_plan.md`, `PLAN.md`, or `task.md`) with the new phased structure. Preserve all original content — restructure, do not delete. Each phase should clearly show: steps, `/verify` gate, and what the gate validates. **If the plan has no source file** (existed only in conversation context), output the full restructured plan as a fenced code block in the response instead.792. **Diff report** — summarize what changed: how many phases created, how many `/verify` gates added, any steps reordered or split.8081## Rules8283- MUST preserve ALL original plan content — restructure, never delete84- MUST maintain original intent and goal alignment85- MUST use the same file format as the original plan86- MUST NOT add new scope or features not in the original plan87- MUST NOT create ceremonial `/verify` gates with vague focus8889## Next Steps9091- `/plan-execute` — implement the newly phased plan92- `/double-check` — verify the restructured plan before executing9394> **Human output.** This skill's handler-facing output obeys the human-output95> contract (`human-output/SKILL.md`).9697> **Next skills.** On completion, run the Next Skills protocol (`next-skills/SKILL.md`): surface the `next-skills` recommendations from front-matter for the caller to pick. Offer only — never auto-invoke.9899> **Self-improvement.** On completion, run the Self-Improvement Protocol (`self-improve/SKILL.md`): if this run surfaced a concrete, blocking-or-recurring weakness in this skill, propose a specific fix for the handler to approve. Conservative — silent otherwise. Never auto-apply.