MCP 2026-07-28 migration
The 2026-07-28 revision is a refactor, not a version bump. Six things this checker looks for break existing servers:
- The transport is stateless. The
initialize/notifications/initializedhandshake and theMcp-Session-Idheader are gone from this revision. Every request carries its own protocol version and client capabilities in_meta. This does not mean deleting the handshake. A server "wishing to support both legacy clients … and modern clients MAY implement both behaviors" and picks its semantics from how each request opens — so the goal is to add the modern path, and retire the legacy one on the schedule your own clients dictate. Removing it for compliance breaks every v1 client for no gain. - OAuth 2.1 is formalized for remote servers: a protected MCP server acts as an OAuth 2.1 resource server and MUST implement RFC 9728 protected-resource metadata.
logging,sampling, androotsare deprecated — still functional, with a twelve-month minimum window, but new implementations should not adopt them.- The TypeScript SDK moved to v2 under new package names.
@modelcontextprotocol/sdkis the v1 line and stops at 1.30.0. v2 ships as@modelcontextprotocol/server+@modelcontextprotocol/client(plus/coreand an/express,/fastifyor/honoadapter). - The Python SDK moved to v2 under the same package name. The official
PyPI package remains
mcp, whilemcp.server.fastmcp.FastMCPbecomesmcp.server.MCPServer. A<2constraint or the old import is a v1 signal.
The revision changed more than the checker covers: server/discover is now
mandatory, all results carry a required resultType, the GET stream and
resources/subscribe are replaced by subscriptions/listen, ping and
logging/setLevel are gone, SSE resumability is removed, and Mcp-Method /
Mcp-Name headers are required. A clean checker run is not a migration.
Read the changelog
before declaring a server done.
Do not tell anyone to upgrade @modelcontextprotocol/sdk to ^2. That
package has never published a 2.x — the migration is to the new package names
above. There is an official codemod, and it is a separate package:
npx @modelcontextprotocol/codemod@latest v1-to-v2 .
That codemod is TypeScript-only. Do not reach for it, or for a package rename, when the project is Go — which is the next thing on this list.
- The Go SDK moved by a minor, on the same module path.
github.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdkspeaks 2026-07-28 from v1.7.0; v1.6.1 is the last release on 2025-11-25. There is nogo-sdk/v2— the module proxy 404s it — so never advise an import-path change or a 2.x.github.com/mark3labs/mcp-gocrossed at its own v1.0.0. And for the official SDK the upgrade is only half of it: the streamable HTTP transport serves the revision only withStreamableHTTPOptions.Stateless = true. Left unset, clients negotiate down to 2025-11-25. A stdio server needs no such flag.
C# moved differently again — a 2.x major of the ModelContextProtocol
packages. Check the actual package before advising a version.
Work in this order: diagnose, triage, remediate, re-verify. The diagnosis step is scripted so it gives the same answer every time — resist the urge to skip it and eyeball the code, because the rule ids it emits are what the remediation guidance keys off.
Step 1 — Diagnose
Run the bundled checker. It needs nothing but Node — no install step.
# Scan a repository (the richest signal; this is the one to start with)
node scripts/mcpcheck.mjs --source /path/to/the/server
# Probe a running endpoint
node scripts/mcpcheck.mjs https://example.com/mcp
# Probe a local dev server (disables the SSRF guard)
node scripts/mcpcheck.mjs --local http://localhost:3000/mcp
# Machine-readable, if you want to process the findings
node scripts/mcpcheck.mjs --source . --json
Run both the source scan and a live probe when a server is actually running. They see different things and neither is a superset of the other:
| Source scan | Live probe | |
|---|---|---|
| Sees | code, package.json, Python manifests, Cargo.toml, go.mod, file:line |
both protocol eras, headers, advertised capabilities, OAuth posture |
| Finds | MCP001–005, MCP007/MCP009/MCP010/MCP011 (SDK lines) | MCP001–006, MCP008, MCP101/102 |
| Needs | a checkout | a reachable endpoint |
Exit codes: 0 no critical findings · 1 at least one critical · 2
inconclusive (unreachable, blocked, or nothing to scan).
Step 2 — Triage before you touch anything
The source scan is regex-based. It greps for the patterns that correlate with each hazard, which means it reports signals, not proof. Two consequences worth internalising before you start editing:
- False positives are normal. A file that merely mentions
initializein a comment, or a variable coincidentally namedsessionId, will be flagged. The checker's own source flags itself for all five code rules, because the rules file contains the very strings it searches for. - A clean scan is not a guarantee. Session state can be spelled in ways the
patterns don't catch — a
Mapkeyed by something the code callsclientKey, for instance.
So read each finding at its file:line, decide whether it is real, and say so
explicitly before changing anything. A short triage table is a good artefact to
produce here: rule, location, real or false positive, and why.
Findings are graded: 100 minus 30 per critical and 15 per warning. info
findings (MCP1xx) cost nothing — they record compatibility choices the
spec permits, such as a dual-era server still answering initialize, so that a
report can distinguish "still accepts legacy" from "only accepts legacy". Treat
the letter grade as a headline for humans, not as the thing to optimize. Fixing
the criticals matters far more than the score moving from D to B.
Step 3 — Remediate
Read references/remediation.md for the per-rule guidance. It is organised by
rule id, so go straight to the sections your findings named rather than reading
it end to end.
Sequence matters. Do it in this order, because later steps depend on earlier ones:
- The SDK finding first — MCP007 for TypeScript, MCP009 for Python, MCP010
for Rust, MCP011 for Go. Doing
this before the code changes means you refactor against the API you are
going to keep, instead of refactoring twice. For MCP007, move to the v2
packages and run the TypeScript codemod. For MCP009, move
mcpto 2.x and follow the official Python migration guide (FastMCP→MCPServeris the first import change). For MCP010, upgrade tormcp3.x orrust-mcp-sdk2.x (both speak spec 2026-07-28). Fortower-mcp, enable theprotocol-2026-07-28feature. For MCP011,go get github.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdk@v1.7.0— the module path is unchanged, so nothing imports differently — and if you serve streamable HTTP, setStreamableHTTPOptions.Stateless: true, because the upgrade alone leaves clients negotiating down to 2025-11-25. The remaining errors point at the architectural work. - MCP002 (session state) — the deepest change, and the one most likely to surface hidden design assumptions.
- MCP001 (legacy-only) — add the modern request path and
server/discover; largely mechanical once state is gone. Keep the legacy handshake serving alongside it unless you have decided, as a product call, to drop v1 clients. - MCP003/004/005 (deprecated capabilities) — removals, each one localised.
These are
warning, notcritical, and the deprecation window is at least twelve months. If the migration is already large, deferring them is a defensible call — say so rather than silently skipping them. - MCP006 (OAuth posture) — deployment-facing; independent of the rest.
After each step, re-run the scan. Watching one rule at a time go quiet is a much better signal than a single run at the end where you can't tell which change fixed what.
Step 4 — Verify
Re-run both the source scan and, if a server is running, the live probe. Then check the things the scanner structurally cannot see:
- Does the server still behave correctly when two consecutive requests land on different instances? This is the real test of statelessness, and no static scan can answer it. Run two instances behind anything that round-robins, or restart the process between requests.
- Do the tests still pass, and do they still cover the paths you changed?
- If you removed
sampling, has the model-calling responsibility actually moved to the client, or has it just been deleted?
Reporting back
Close with a short summary in this shape — it is what someone reviewing the migration needs, and nothing more:
## Migration summary
- Before: <grade> — <n> findings (<n> critical)
- After: <grade> — <n> findings (<n> critical)
## Changed
- <rule id>: <what was changed, where>
## Dismissed as false positives
- <rule id> at <file:line>: <why it was not a real hazard>
## Still open
- <anything deliberately not fixed, and why>
The "dismissed" section is the one people skip and later regret. If you decided a finding was noise, the reasoning needs to survive past the end of the session.
A note on the spec itself
The findings link to the canonical spec at
https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/2026-07-28. When a fix involves
an exact API signature or a precise header name, check it there rather than
trusting a remembered detail — this skill describes the shape of each change,
not a frozen copy of the specification.