TR Research Ethics — Turkish Etik Kurul & Onam Form Scaffolder
The Turkey-specific counterpart to alterlab-research-ethics. Given a study
description, it answers the first question every Turkish researcher faces —
which etik kurul (ethics committee) do I need? — then scaffolds the bilingual
dossier (başvuru formu, dilekçe, onam formu) and lints the consent form against
the TİTCK minimum-content checklist. Glossary on first use: etik kurul =
ethics committee; onam / olur formu = informed-consent form; dilekçe = formal
cover petition; TİTCK = Türkiye İlaç ve Tıbbi Cihaz Kurumu (Turkish Medicines
and Medical Devices Agency); öz = abstract.
This skill scaffolds and routes. It does not grant approval, and a draft it
produces is not a substitute for your institution's own committee templates,
which always take precedence.
When to Use This Skill
Use it when the request is about Turkish human-subjects ethics review:
IEU anket çalışması için etik kurul başvurusu hazırla
Bu cihaz çalışması için TİTCK onayı / klinik araştırma etik kurulu gerekir mi?
Draft a Turkish bilgilendirilmiş onam (informed consent) form for an interview study
Which ethics committee do I need for a focus-group study at a Turkish university?
Check my olur formu against the TİTCK minimum-content rules
Does NOT Trigger
Route adjacent requests to the correct sibling skill instead of firing here:
| Request |
Route to |
| US/EU IRB, Belmont Report, HIPAA, GDPR, non-Turkey ethics board |
alterlab-research-ethics |
| KVKK-compliant data management plan, anonymization, VERBIS, açık rıza data basis |
alterlab-kvkk-dmp |
| TÜBİTAK Veri Yönetim Planı, Aperta deposit, open-access mandate |
alterlab-aperta |
| Drafting the TÜBİTAK ARDEB 1001/1002-A proposal narrative |
alterlab-tubitak-proposal |
| Survey instrument design / item wording (not the ethics dossier) |
alterlab-survey-design |
| Qualitative interview/focus-group method design |
alterlab-qualitative-methods |
| Pre-registration of hypotheses & analysis plan |
alterlab-open-science |
| Checking a journal's TR Dizin indexing status |
alterlab-trdizin |
| Docentlik (associate-professorship) eligibility / point math |
alterlab-docentlik-eligibility |
| Akademik teşvik (academic-incentive) scoring |
alterlab-akademik-tesvik |
The boundary with alterlab-kvkk-dmp matters: ethics review (this skill) and
KVKK data protection (that skill) are two separate legal tracks for the same
study. A full project usually needs both — scaffold the etik kurul dossier here,
then hand off to alterlab-kvkk-dmp for the data plan.
The Routing Rule (do this first)
Turkish ethics review has two doors, and sending a study to the wrong one
wastes a review cycle. Route by what the study does, per
references/etik_kurul_routing.md:
Door 1 — Üniversite Girişimsel Olmayan (non-interventional) Etik Kurulu.
Triggered by the TR Dizin/ULAKBİM rule (mandatory for publications from 2020):
any study collecting data from participants via survey (anket), interview
(görüşme), focus group (odak grup), observation (gözlem), or experiment (deney)
needs ethics-committee approval. For non-clinical social/behavioral/education
research this is the researcher's own university non-interventional committee.
Door 2 — TİTCK-onaylı Klinik Araştırmalar Etik Kurulu + ayrı TİTCK izni.
Studies on human medicinal products, medical devices, cosmetics, stem cells,
or bioavailability/bioequivalence (BA/BE) require a committee approved by
TİTCK and a separate TİTCK start permit. Per TİTCK, clinical research is
conducted "TİTCK tarafından onay verilen Etik Kurulların onayı ve Sağlık
Bakanlığının izni ile." A decision from a committee not approved by TİTCK is
legally void for clinical research — verify the committee's TİTCK accreditation
before you submit.
Governing instrument: Beşeri Tıbbi Ürünlerin Klinik Araştırmaları Hakkında
Yönetmelik (Regulation on Clinical Research of Human Medicinal Products),
mevzuat.gov.tr MevzuatNo 40207. See references/etik_kurul_routing.md for the
full decision tree, edge cases (retrospective record review, secondary data,
minors/vulnerable groups), and source citations.
Some studies hit both doors (e.g. a device trial that also runs a patient
survey). When in doubt, the clinical track governs and you escalate to Door 2.
What It Produces
A bilingual (Turkish primary, English gloss) dossier skeleton. Pull the
templates from references/dossier_templates.md:
- Etik Kurul Başvuru Formu — application form skeleton: title, PI/araştırmacı
roster, aim & rationale (öz), design, population & sample, instruments,
risk/benefit, data-handling summary (with a pointer to the KVKK plan), and the
informed-consent procedure.
- Başvuru Dilekçesi — the formal cover petition addressed to the committee.
- Bilgilendirilmiş Gönüllü Olur Formu — the participant-facing consent form,
built to satisfy the TİTCK minimum-content checklist (below).
- Ek/CV bundle checklist — instruments, measurement tools, researcher CVs,
data-collection-permission letters, and any institutional annexes.
Always tell the user that their own university committee's official form
overrides this skeleton where the two differ.
Consent-Form Minimum Content (TİTCK, updated 29 Mar 2023)
The Bilgilendirilmiş Gönüllü Olur Formu must, at minimum, carry the elements in
references/consent_minimum_contents.md. Headline items:
- Date, version, and page numbering on every page (and volunteer initials per
page for clinical-track forms).
- Plain-language statement of purpose, procedures, expected duration, and
what participation involves.
- Foreseeable risks/discomforts and benefits, stated honestly.
- A 24-hour contact for problems or questions.
- An explicit statement that participation is voluntary and the participant
may withdraw at any time without penalty.
- An explicit no-coercion statement.
- For clinical-track studies: insurance, alternative treatments, and the
sponsor/contact chain as the regulation requires.
Lint a draft consent form
uv run python skills/turkish-academia/alterlab-tr-research-ethics/scripts/consent_form_check.py \
path/to/olur_formu.md
The linter (scripts/consent_form_check.py, standard-library only) scans a draft
for the required elements above (in Turkish or English) and prints a per-element
PASS / MISSING table plus an overall verdict. It is a completeness aid, not a
legal sign-off: a PASS means the checklist elements are present, not that the
wording satisfies the committee. Run it, read the JSON/table, and report the
MISSING items to the user with the exact element name.
Workflow
- Classify the study → run the routing rule. State which door (committee
type) applies and why, citing the trigger (e.g. "collects interview data →
non-interventional committee" or "tests a medical device → TİTCK clinical
committee + permit").
- Flag the clinical-track gate when Door 2 applies: remind the user to
confirm the committee is TİTCK-approved and that a separate TİTCK permit is
required.
- Scaffold the dossier from
references/dossier_templates.md, filled with
the study's specifics; keep Turkish as the primary language with an English
gloss.
- Build & lint the consent form against the TİTCK checklist; run
scripts/consent_form_check.py and surface MISSING elements.
- Hand off the data-protection half to
alterlab-kvkk-dmp and (if funded /
open-access) the deposit half to alterlab-aperta.
- Disclaim: outputs are drafts; the institution's official forms and the
committee's own decision are authoritative. Caps, forms, and checklists change
— verify against the current TİTCK / university committee documents before
submission.
Self-Check Before Reporting
- Did I name the specific committee type (non-interventional vs TİTCK
clinical) and the trigger that put the study there?
- For any clinical-track study, did I flag the TİTCK-approval + separate permit
requirement and the "non-approved committee = legally void" rule?
- Did I run the consent linter and report MISSING elements by name, not just a
pass/fail?
- Did I route data-protection to
alterlab-kvkk-dmp rather than improvising KVKK
advice here?
- Did I state that institutional forms override the skeleton and that figures/rules
must be verified against current sources?
References
references/etik_kurul_routing.md — full two-door decision tree, trigger list,
edge cases, and primary-source citations.
references/consent_minimum_contents.md — the TİTCK minimum-content checklist
the linter enforces, element by element.
references/dossier_templates.md — bilingual başvuru formu, dilekçe, and olur
formu skeletons plus the annex checklist.
Primary sources
- TİTCK — Klinik Araştırmalar. https://www.titck.gov.tr/faaliyetalanlari/ilac/klinik-arastirmalar
- Beşeri Tıbbi Ürünlerin Klinik Araştırmaları Hakkında Yönetmelik — mevzuat.gov.tr MevzuatNo 40207 (R.G. 27/5/2023, No. 32203).
- TİTCK informed-consent minimum contents, updated 29 Mar 2023.
- TR Dizin (TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM) research-and-publication-ethics criteria — ethics-committee approval mandatory for participant data collection in publications from 2020. https://trdizin.gov.tr/
Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.
1---2name: alterlab-tr-research-ethics3description: Scaffolds Turkish human-subjects etik kurul (ethics committee) applications and routes a study to the correct committee using the TR Dizin/ULAKBIM 2020 trigger rule: survey, interview, focus-group, observation, or experiment data collection requires a university Girisimsel Olmayan Etik Kurulu (non-interventional committee); drug, device, cosmetic, stem-cell, or BA-BE clinical studies also require a TITCK-approved Klinik Arastirmalar Etik Kurulu plus a separate TITCK permit. Generates bilingual (TR/EN) Etik Kurul Basvuru Formu, basvuru dilekcesi (cover petition), and Bilgilendirilmis Gonullu Olur Formu (informed consent), and lints a consent draft against the TITCK 2023 minimum-content checklist. Use when the user needs a Turkish etik kurul basvurusu, an onam/olur (consent) formu, asks which ethics committee a study requires, or needs TITCK approval guidance. For non-Turkey IRB/Belmont/GDPR use alterlab-research-ethics; for KVKK data plans use alterlab-kvkk-dmp. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.4license: MIT5---67# TR Research Ethics — Turkish Etik Kurul & Onam Form Scaffolder89The Turkey-specific counterpart to `alterlab-research-ethics`. Given a study10description, it answers the first question every Turkish researcher faces —11**which etik kurul** (ethics committee) do I need? — then scaffolds the bilingual12dossier (başvuru formu, dilekçe, onam formu) and lints the consent form against13the TİTCK minimum-content checklist. Glossary on first use: *etik kurul* =14ethics committee; *onam / olur formu* = informed-consent form; *dilekçe* = formal15cover petition; *TİTCK* = Türkiye İlaç ve Tıbbi Cihaz Kurumu (Turkish Medicines16and Medical Devices Agency); *öz* = abstract.1718This skill scaffolds and routes. It does **not** grant approval, and a draft it19produces is not a substitute for your institution's own committee templates,20which always take precedence.2122## When to Use This Skill2324Use it when the request is about **Turkish** human-subjects ethics review:2526```27IEU anket çalışması için etik kurul başvurusu hazırla28Bu cihaz çalışması için TİTCK onayı / klinik araştırma etik kurulu gerekir mi?29Draft a Turkish bilgilendirilmiş onam (informed consent) form for an interview study30Which ethics committee do I need for a focus-group study at a Turkish university?31Check my olur formu against the TİTCK minimum-content rules32```3334### Does NOT Trigger3536Route adjacent requests to the correct sibling skill instead of firing here:3738| Request | Route to |39|---------|----------|40| US/EU IRB, Belmont Report, HIPAA, GDPR, non-Turkey ethics board | `alterlab-research-ethics` |41| KVKK-compliant **data management plan**, anonymization, VERBIS, açık rıza data basis | `alterlab-kvkk-dmp` |42| TÜBİTAK Veri Yönetim Planı, Aperta deposit, open-access mandate | `alterlab-aperta` |43| Drafting the TÜBİTAK ARDEB 1001/1002-A **proposal** narrative | `alterlab-tubitak-proposal` |44| Survey **instrument design** / item wording (not the ethics dossier) | `alterlab-survey-design` |45| Qualitative interview/focus-group **method design** | `alterlab-qualitative-methods` |46| Pre-registration of hypotheses & analysis plan | `alterlab-open-science` |47| Checking a journal's TR Dizin indexing status | `alterlab-trdizin` |48| Docentlik (associate-professorship) eligibility / point math | `alterlab-docentlik-eligibility` |49| Akademik teşvik (academic-incentive) scoring | `alterlab-akademik-tesvik` |5051The boundary with `alterlab-kvkk-dmp` matters: **ethics review (this skill)** and52**KVKK data protection (that skill)** are two separate legal tracks for the same53study. A full project usually needs both — scaffold the etik kurul dossier here,54then hand off to `alterlab-kvkk-dmp` for the data plan.5556---5758## The Routing Rule (do this first)5960Turkish ethics review has **two doors**, and sending a study to the wrong one61wastes a review cycle. Route by what the study *does*, per62`references/etik_kurul_routing.md`:6364**Door 1 — Üniversite Girişimsel Olmayan (non-interventional) Etik Kurulu.**65Triggered by the TR Dizin/ULAKBİM rule (mandatory for publications from **2020**):66any study collecting data **from participants** via **survey (anket), interview67(görüşme), focus group (odak grup), observation (gözlem), or experiment (deney)**68needs ethics-committee approval. For non-clinical social/behavioral/education69research this is the researcher's own university non-interventional committee.7071**Door 2 — TİTCK-onaylı Klinik Araştırmalar Etik Kurulu + ayrı TİTCK izni.**72Studies on **human medicinal products, medical devices, cosmetics, stem cells,73or bioavailability/bioequivalence (BA/BE)** require a committee **approved by74TİTCK** *and* a **separate TİTCK start permit**. Per TİTCK, clinical research is75conducted "TİTCK tarafından onay verilen Etik Kurulların onayı ve Sağlık76Bakanlığının izni ile." **A decision from a committee not approved by TİTCK is77legally void for clinical research** — verify the committee's TİTCK accreditation78before you submit.7980Governing instrument: *Beşeri Tıbbi Ürünlerin Klinik Araştırmaları Hakkında81Yönetmelik* (Regulation on Clinical Research of Human Medicinal Products),82mevzuat.gov.tr MevzuatNo 40207. See `references/etik_kurul_routing.md` for the83full decision tree, edge cases (retrospective record review, secondary data,84minors/vulnerable groups), and source citations.8586> Some studies hit **both** doors (e.g. a device trial that also runs a patient87> survey). When in doubt, the clinical track governs and you escalate to Door 2.8889---9091## What It Produces9293A bilingual (Turkish primary, English gloss) dossier skeleton. Pull the94templates from `references/dossier_templates.md`:95961. **Etik Kurul Başvuru Formu** — application form skeleton: title, PI/araştırmacı97 roster, aim & rationale (öz), design, population & sample, instruments,98 risk/benefit, data-handling summary (with a pointer to the KVKK plan), and the99 informed-consent procedure.1002. **Başvuru Dilekçesi** — the formal cover petition addressed to the committee.1013. **Bilgilendirilmiş Gönüllü Olur Formu** — the participant-facing consent form,102 built to satisfy the TİTCK minimum-content checklist (below).1034. **Ek/CV bundle checklist** — instruments, measurement tools, researcher CVs,104 data-collection-permission letters, and any institutional annexes.105106Always tell the user that **their own university committee's official form107overrides this skeleton** where the two differ.108109---110111## Consent-Form Minimum Content (TİTCK, updated 29 Mar 2023)112113The Bilgilendirilmiş Gönüllü Olur Formu must, at minimum, carry the elements in114`references/consent_minimum_contents.md`. Headline items:115116- **Date, version, and page numbering on every page** (and volunteer initials per117 page for clinical-track forms).118- **Plain-language** statement of purpose, procedures, expected duration, and119 what participation involves.120- **Foreseeable risks/discomforts and benefits**, stated honestly.121- A **24-hour contact** for problems or questions.122- An explicit statement that participation is **voluntary** and the participant123 may **withdraw at any time without penalty**.124- An explicit **no-coercion** statement.125- For clinical-track studies: insurance, alternative treatments, and the126 sponsor/contact chain as the regulation requires.127128### Lint a draft consent form129130```bash131uv run python skills/turkish-academia/alterlab-tr-research-ethics/scripts/consent_form_check.py \132 path/to/olur_formu.md133```134135The linter (`scripts/consent_form_check.py`, standard-library only) scans a draft136for the required elements above (in Turkish or English) and prints a per-element137PASS / MISSING table plus an overall verdict. It is a **completeness aid, not a138legal sign-off**: a PASS means the checklist elements are present, not that the139wording satisfies the committee. Run it, read the JSON/table, and report the140MISSING items to the user with the exact element name.141142---143144## Workflow1451461. **Classify the study** → run the routing rule. State which door (committee147 type) applies and *why*, citing the trigger (e.g. "collects interview data →148 non-interventional committee" or "tests a medical device → TİTCK clinical149 committee + permit").1502. **Flag the clinical-track gate** when Door 2 applies: remind the user to151 confirm the committee is TİTCK-approved and that a separate TİTCK permit is152 required.1533. **Scaffold the dossier** from `references/dossier_templates.md`, filled with154 the study's specifics; keep Turkish as the primary language with an English155 gloss.1564. **Build & lint the consent form** against the TİTCK checklist; run157 `scripts/consent_form_check.py` and surface MISSING elements.1585. **Hand off** the data-protection half to `alterlab-kvkk-dmp` and (if funded /159 open-access) the deposit half to `alterlab-aperta`.1606. **Disclaim**: outputs are drafts; the institution's official forms and the161 committee's own decision are authoritative. Caps, forms, and checklists change162 — verify against the current TİTCK / university committee documents before163 submission.164165---166167## Self-Check Before Reporting168169- Did I name the **specific committee type** (non-interventional vs TİTCK170 clinical) and the trigger that put the study there?171- For any clinical-track study, did I flag the **TİTCK-approval + separate permit**172 requirement and the "non-approved committee = legally void" rule?173- Did I run the consent linter and report **MISSING** elements by name, not just a174 pass/fail?175- Did I route data-protection to `alterlab-kvkk-dmp` rather than improvising KVKK176 advice here?177- Did I state that institutional forms override the skeleton and that figures/rules178 must be verified against current sources?179180---181182## References183184- `references/etik_kurul_routing.md` — full two-door decision tree, trigger list,185 edge cases, and primary-source citations.186- `references/consent_minimum_contents.md` — the TİTCK minimum-content checklist187 the linter enforces, element by element.188- `references/dossier_templates.md` — bilingual başvuru formu, dilekçe, and olur189 formu skeletons plus the annex checklist.190191### Primary sources192193- TİTCK — Klinik Araştırmalar. https://www.titck.gov.tr/faaliyetalanlari/ilac/klinik-arastirmalar194- *Beşeri Tıbbi Ürünlerin Klinik Araştırmaları Hakkında Yönetmelik* — mevzuat.gov.tr MevzuatNo 40207 (R.G. 27/5/2023, No. 32203).195- TİTCK informed-consent minimum contents, updated 29 Mar 2023.196- TR Dizin (TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM) research-and-publication-ethics criteria — ethics-committee approval mandatory for participant data collection in publications from 2020. https://trdizin.gov.tr/197198Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.