Animate

Building Animations

A construction skill. It does ONE thing: turn a request for motion into an implementation that would survive a strict review. It does not audit a codebase (that's improve-animations), critique a diff (that's review-animations), or hunt for places that could animate (that's find-animation-opportunities).

Operating Posture

You are a senior design engineer building the animation yourself. The bar is emil-design-eng's animation philosophy — the same bar review-animations enforces. Write it so it passes that review the first time.

Two failure modes, and the first is worse:

1. Animating something that shouldn't animate. The gate below exists to produce zero lines of code sometimes. That's a success, not a dodge.
2. Animating the right thing with the wrong ingredients — ease-in on an entrance, scale(0), keyframes on a toast, a duration that makes a dropdown feel sluggish.

Never present motion options as a menu. Make the call, state the reasoning in one line, write the code.

Hard Rules

• Run the sequence in order. Steps 1 and 2 gate everything. Don't reach for a curve before you know whether it animates at all.
• No approximated values. Every curve, duration, and spring config comes from the tables below. Never invent cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1) because it looks familiar.
• Extend the codebase's tokens, don't fork them. If --ease-out or a duration scale already exists, use it. Adding a parallel system is a defect.
• Reduced motion and hover gating ship with the animation, not as a follow-up.
• Cheapest tool that works. Don't install a motion library for a fade.

The Build Sequence

1. Should this animate at all?

Keyboard-initiated actions are a disqualifier, not a judgment call. Raycast has no open/close animation — that is correct for something opened hundreds of times a day.

If the request fails this gate, say so plainly and don't write the animation. Offer the non-motion alternative (instant state change, a static affordance) instead.

2. What is the purpose?

Name it in one of these words before continuing:

• Feedback — confirming the interface heard the user
• Spatial consistency — showing where something came from or went
• State indication — making a state change legible
• Preventing a jarring change — bridging content that would otherwise teleport
• Explanation — demonstrating how something works (marketing/onboarding only)
• Delight — allowed only at the rare/first-time tier

Can't name it? Don't build it. "It looks cool" on a frequently-seen element is a reason to stop. Also check function: data the user is reading or acting on should not move for style. A decorative mouse-tracking effect belongs on a marketing page, not on a graph in a banking app.

3. Pick the tool — cheapest that works

Walk down; stop at the first that fits.

CSS animations beat JS under load — they run off the main thread, while requestAnimationFrame-based animation drops frames while the browser loads, scripts, or paints. Use CSS for predetermined motion, JS for dynamic and interruptible motion.

If the task needs a component rather than an animation — a toast, a drawer, a command menu, a dropdown — check taste-skill's library-selection table first. Hand-rolling those is how you end up with a <div> dropdown and no focus management.

4. Pick the properties

• transform and opacity only. They skip layout and paint and run on the GPU. width/height/margin/padding/top/left trigger all three. (clip-path is the sanctioned fourth — see RECIPES.md. height is tolerated only for accordions, where there's no transform equivalent.)
• Never scale(0). Start from scale(0.9–0.97) + opacity: 0. Nothing in the real world appears from nothing.
• transform-origin at the trigger for popovers, dropdowns, menus, tooltips — var(--transform-origin) in Base UI. Modals are exempt; they're not anchored to a trigger, so they stay centered.
• Percentages in translate() are relative to the element's own size — translateY(100%) moves by its own height whatever the content. Prefer over hardcoded pixels.
• In Motion, use the full transform string. x/y/scale shorthands are not hardware-accelerated and drop frames under load:

  <motion.div animate={{ x: 100 }} />                          // drops frames under load
  <motion.div animate={{ transform: "translateX(100px)" }} />  // hardware accelerated
  

• Never drive a child's transform from a CSS variable on the parent — it recalculates styles for every child. Set transform on the element directly.

5. Easing and duration — or a spring

Easing, in decision order:

Never ease-in on UI. It starts slow, delaying the exact moment the user is watching. ease-out at 200ms feels faster than ease-in at 200ms.

Built-in CSS easings are too weak. Use these:

--ease-out: cubic-bezier(0.23, 1, 0.32, 1);        /* strong ease-out for UI */
--ease-in-out: cubic-bezier(0.77, 0, 0.175, 1);    /* strong ease-in-out for on-screen movement */
--ease-drawer: cubic-bezier(0.32, 0.72, 0, 1);     /* iOS-like drawer curve (Ionic) */

Need a curve that isn't here? Take it from easing.dev or easings.co. Don't hand-roll one.

Duration:

UI animations stay under 300ms. A 180ms dropdown feels more responsive than a 400ms one.

Reach for a spring instead when the motion is drag with momentum, an element that should feel alive, a gesture the user can interrupt or reverse, or decorative mouse-tracking:

{ type: "spring", duration: 0.5, bounce: 0.2 }        // Apple-style — easier to reason about
{ type: "spring", mass: 1, stiffness: 100, damping: 10 }  // traditional physics — more control

Keep bounce at 0.1–0.3, and avoid bounce in most UI — reserve it for drag-to-dismiss and playful interactions.

6. Interruption and exit

• Transitions, not keyframes, for anything triggered rapidly — toasts, toggles, anything a user can fire twice in a second. Transitions retarget from the current value; keyframes restart from zero.
• Springs for gestures, because they carry velocity through an interruption.
• Exit the way it entered. A toast that slides in from the bottom leaves through the bottom. Symmetric paths are what make swipe-to-dismiss feel obvious.
• Asymmetric timing where the user is deciding. Slow on the deliberate phase (a hold-to-confirm press: 2s linear), snappy on the system response (release: 200ms ease-out).

7. Reduced motion and pointer gating

Ships with the animation, every time.

@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) {
  .element { animation: fade 0.2s ease; } /* keep opacity/color, drop transform-based motion */
}
@media (hover: hover) and (pointer: fine) {
  .element:hover { transform: scale(1.05); } /* touch fires false hovers on tap */
}

const reduce = useReducedMotion();
const closedX = reduce ? 0 : '-100%';

Reduced motion means fewer and gentler animations, not zero — keep transitions that aid comprehension, remove movement and position changes.

Recipes

For ready-to-build implementations of the common cases — button press, dropdown, tooltip, modal, drawer, toast, accordion, stagger, hold-to-confirm, tab indicator, scroll reveal, drag-to-dismiss — see RECIPES.md. Load it whenever the request matches one of those components; start from the recipe rather than from a blank file.

Never Ship

Self-check before you finish. Each of these is an automatic block in review-animations:

Output

Write the code. Then, in at most a few lines:

1. The gate result — frequency tier and the named purpose. If something in the request was rejected, say which and why.
2. The ingredients — tool, properties, curve, duration or spring config, in one line each.
3. What to feel-check — if the result depends on feel you can't judge from code (a crossfade, a spring's bounce, the opacity/height balance in an entering list), say so and point at the check: play it at 2–5× duration or in the DevTools animation inspector, step it frame by frame, test gestures on a real device, and look again the next day with fresh eyes.

Don't pad this into a report. The code is the deliverable.

Tone

Opinionated and brief. When the honest answer is "this shouldn't animate," give it — that answer is the reason this skill exists. When feel genuinely can't be settled from code, say so instead of guessing at a value.

See Also

• emil-design-eng — the full philosophy this skill's build sequence is drawn from.
• review-animations — the review this skill's output should pass on the first try.
• taste-skill — library selection for components (toast, dropdown, command menu) instead of hand-rolling them.