Agent plan review
Reviewing a plan costs a minute; reviewing a wrong implementation costs an hour and a revert. Asking for the plan first is the highest-value habit in agent-assisted work.
Method
- Ask for the plan before any edit. Files to change, the approach, and the order, so the direction can be corrected before effort is spent (see agent-plan-execute-replan).
- Check it against your intent. Agents frequently solve a nearby problem correctly, and the plan is where that becomes visible.
- Look for what is missing. Tests, migrations, error handling, and documentation are the usual omissions.
- Challenge unnecessary scope. Plans that touch more than needed produce reviews that are hard to reason about (see pull-request-size).
- Confirm the verification step. How the agent will know it worked, since a plan without a check ends in assumed success.
- Approve explicitly and let it run. Once the plan is right, interrupting each step wastes the benefit of delegation.
- Compare the result to the plan. Divergence is worth understanding, since it is either discovery or drift.
Boundaries
A good plan does not guarantee good implementation and must still be reviewed. Plan review adds a turn, which is not worth it for trivial changes. Agents can produce plausible plans for approaches that will not work, which needs your judgement.