Learning rate schedules
Too high and the loss diverges or oscillates; too low and training crawls into a poor solution. Varying it over training, high early and low late, is standard because early and late training need different step sizes.
Method
- Find the range empirically. A short run sweeping the rate shows where loss falls fastest and where it diverges, which beats guessing from a paper.
- Warm up from a small value. Starting at full rate destabilises early training, particularly with adaptive optimisers and large batches.
- Decay over the run. Cosine and step decay both work; the principle is large steps while far from a solution and small steps while refining.
- Scale with batch size. Larger batches give less noisy gradients and tolerate proportionally larger rates, which is why batch size and rate must be tuned together (see batch-size-effects).
- Read the loss curve for the symptom. Divergence means too high, a plateau from the start means too low, and oscillation around a value means too high for the current phase.
- Lower the rate when fine-tuning. A pretrained model needs far smaller steps than one trained from scratch, or it forgets what it knew.
- Log the rate alongside the loss. Interpreting a curve without knowing the schedule is guesswork (see training-loop-design).
Boundaries
Schedules interact with optimiser, batch size, and regularisation, so transferred settings usually need retuning. Automated schedulers reacting to plateaus can trigger on noise. No schedule rescues an unsuitable architecture or bad data.