Evidence Weighting Skill
Domain knowledge for evidence tier classification, confidence calibration, and bias detection in AI-generated startup analysis.
Feeds into: validator-scoring-fragment.md (evidence-weighted scoring), validator-composer-fragment.md (bias flag warnings), Report UI (evidence tier badges).
StartupAI Integration
This knowledge feeds into:
- Scoring Agent: Weight scores by evidence quality (cited sources score higher than AI inference)
- Composer Agent: Bias flag warnings when report relies too heavily on AI-inferred data
- Report UI: Evidence tier badges (Cited/Founder/AI) on each scored dimension
- AI Chat: When coaching founders, distinguish "we know this" from "we're guessing"
Evidence Tier System
Three Tiers
| Tier |
Label |
Weight |
Source Type |
Example |
| Tier 1: Cited |
"Cited" |
1.0 |
External source with URL, research report, government data, published benchmark |
"IDC reports global SaaS spending at $232B (2025)" |
| Tier 2: Founder |
"Founder-stated" |
0.8 |
Founder's own data, customer conversations, personal experience, stated traction |
"We have 47 paying customers at $99/mo" |
| Tier 3: AI-inferred |
"AI-inferred" |
0.6 |
AI estimation, analogical reasoning, market projection without primary data |
"Based on competitor pricing patterns, CAC is likely $40-60" |
Classification Rules
- Has a URL or named source? -> Tier 1 (Cited)
- Founder explicitly stated the data? -> Tier 2 (Founder)
- AI generated or estimated? -> Tier 3 (AI-inferred)
- When ambiguous: Default to the LOWER tier (conservative)
- Aggregated data: Use the tier of the weakest source in the aggregation
Weight Application
weighted_score = raw_score x evidence_weight
Example:
- Market size from IDC report: 8/10 x 1.0 = 8.0
- Revenue from founder claim: 7/10 x 0.8 = 5.6
- CAC from AI estimation: 7/10 x 0.6 = 4.2
Dimensions with mostly Tier 3 evidence should be flagged with amber warning.
Bias Detection
Six Bias Types to Detect
| Bias |
Definition |
Detection Signal |
Flag Color |
| Optimism |
Overestimating market size, growth rate, or conversion |
TAM > 10x comparable companies, "everyone needs this" language |
Amber |
| Survivorship |
Only citing successful examples, ignoring failures |
Competitor analysis only lists winners, no mention of failed attempts |
Amber |
| Anchoring |
Over-weighting first data point encountered |
Market size unchanged from initial search despite contradictory sources |
Yellow |
| Confirmation |
Seeking data that supports the hypothesis, ignoring contradictions |
All sources agree, no risk factors identified, no "however" qualifiers |
Amber |
| Recency |
Over-weighting recent trends, ignoring cycles |
All trend data from last 12 months, no historical context |
Yellow |
| Availability |
Over-weighting easily found data, ignoring hard-to-find evidence |
Only top Google results cited, no primary research or niche sources |
Yellow |
Bias Flag Rules
- Flag if 60%+ of a dimension's evidence is Tier 3 (AI-inferred)
- Flag if all sources agree and no contradictions are noted (confirmation bias risk)
- Flag if TAM/SAM/SOM ratios exceed industry norms by 3x+
- Flag if competitive analysis shows 0 high-threat competitors (optimism risk)
- Maximum 3 bias flags per report (prioritize by severity)
Bias Flag Format
{
"type": "optimism",
"dimension": "market_sizing",
"severity": "amber",
"message": "Market size estimate relies entirely on AI projection with no cited source",
"recommendation": "Validate TAM with at least one analyst report or government data source"
}
Confidence Calibration
Signal Strength Levels
| Level |
Label |
Evidence Mix |
Scoring Impact |
| Level 4 |
High confidence |
70%+ Tier 1 (Cited) |
Score as-is |
| Level 3 |
Moderate confidence |
Mix of Tier 1 + Tier 2 |
Score as-is, note evidence quality |
| Level 2 |
Low confidence |
Mostly Tier 2 (Founder-stated) |
Cap dimension at 7/10 max |
| Level 1 |
Very low confidence |
Mostly Tier 3 (AI-inferred) |
Cap dimension at 5/10 max, flag for validation |
Calibration Rules
- Never give a dimension 9+ if evidence is below Level 3
- If a dimension has Level 1 confidence, add it to "needs validation" list
- Report overall confidence = weighted average of dimension confidences
- Show confidence level alongside each dimension score in the report
Gemini Output Schema
When scoring with evidence weighting, use this schema structure:
{
"dimension_name": "market_sizing",
"raw_score": 8,
"evidence_tier": "cited",
"evidence_weight": 1.0,
"weighted_score": 8.0,
"confidence_level": 4,
"sources": ["IDC 2025 SaaS report", "Gartner Magic Quadrant"],
"bias_flags": []
}
Implementation Checklist
1---2name: evidence-weighting3description: Evidence Weighting Skill4---5# Evidence Weighting Skill67> Domain knowledge for evidence tier classification, confidence calibration, and bias detection in AI-generated startup analysis.8> Feeds into: `validator-scoring-fragment.md` (evidence-weighted scoring), `validator-composer-fragment.md` (bias flag warnings), Report UI (evidence tier badges).910## StartupAI Integration1112This knowledge feeds into:13- **Scoring Agent**: Weight scores by evidence quality (cited sources score higher than AI inference)14- **Composer Agent**: Bias flag warnings when report relies too heavily on AI-inferred data15- **Report UI**: Evidence tier badges (Cited/Founder/AI) on each scored dimension16- **AI Chat**: When coaching founders, distinguish "we know this" from "we're guessing"1718## Evidence Tier System1920### Three Tiers2122| Tier | Label | Weight | Source Type | Example |23|------|-------|--------|-------------|---------|24| **Tier 1: Cited** | "Cited" | 1.0 | External source with URL, research report, government data, published benchmark | "IDC reports global SaaS spending at $232B (2025)" |25| **Tier 2: Founder** | "Founder-stated" | 0.8 | Founder's own data, customer conversations, personal experience, stated traction | "We have 47 paying customers at $99/mo" |26| **Tier 3: AI-inferred** | "AI-inferred" | 0.6 | AI estimation, analogical reasoning, market projection without primary data | "Based on competitor pricing patterns, CAC is likely $40-60" |2728### Classification Rules29301. **Has a URL or named source?** -> Tier 1 (Cited)312. **Founder explicitly stated the data?** -> Tier 2 (Founder)323. **AI generated or estimated?** -> Tier 3 (AI-inferred)334. **When ambiguous**: Default to the LOWER tier (conservative)345. **Aggregated data**: Use the tier of the weakest source in the aggregation3536### Weight Application3738```39weighted_score = raw_score x evidence_weight4041Example:42- Market size from IDC report: 8/10 x 1.0 = 8.043- Revenue from founder claim: 7/10 x 0.8 = 5.644- CAC from AI estimation: 7/10 x 0.6 = 4.245```4647Dimensions with mostly Tier 3 evidence should be flagged with amber warning.4849## Bias Detection5051### Six Bias Types to Detect5253| Bias | Definition | Detection Signal | Flag Color |54|------|-----------|-----------------|------------|55| **Optimism** | Overestimating market size, growth rate, or conversion | TAM > 10x comparable companies, "everyone needs this" language | Amber |56| **Survivorship** | Only citing successful examples, ignoring failures | Competitor analysis only lists winners, no mention of failed attempts | Amber |57| **Anchoring** | Over-weighting first data point encountered | Market size unchanged from initial search despite contradictory sources | Yellow |58| **Confirmation** | Seeking data that supports the hypothesis, ignoring contradictions | All sources agree, no risk factors identified, no "however" qualifiers | Amber |59| **Recency** | Over-weighting recent trends, ignoring cycles | All trend data from last 12 months, no historical context | Yellow |60| **Availability** | Over-weighting easily found data, ignoring hard-to-find evidence | Only top Google results cited, no primary research or niche sources | Yellow |6162### Bias Flag Rules6364- Flag if 60%+ of a dimension's evidence is Tier 3 (AI-inferred)65- Flag if all sources agree and no contradictions are noted (confirmation bias risk)66- Flag if TAM/SAM/SOM ratios exceed industry norms by 3x+67- Flag if competitive analysis shows 0 high-threat competitors (optimism risk)68- Maximum 3 bias flags per report (prioritize by severity)6970### Bias Flag Format7172```json73{74 "type": "optimism",75 "dimension": "market_sizing",76 "severity": "amber",77 "message": "Market size estimate relies entirely on AI projection with no cited source",78 "recommendation": "Validate TAM with at least one analyst report or government data source"79}80```8182## Confidence Calibration8384### Signal Strength Levels8586| Level | Label | Evidence Mix | Scoring Impact |87|-------|-------|-------------|----------------|88| **Level 4** | High confidence | 70%+ Tier 1 (Cited) | Score as-is |89| **Level 3** | Moderate confidence | Mix of Tier 1 + Tier 2 | Score as-is, note evidence quality |90| **Level 2** | Low confidence | Mostly Tier 2 (Founder-stated) | Cap dimension at 7/10 max |91| **Level 1** | Very low confidence | Mostly Tier 3 (AI-inferred) | Cap dimension at 5/10 max, flag for validation |9293### Calibration Rules9495- Never give a dimension 9+ if evidence is below Level 396- If a dimension has Level 1 confidence, add it to "needs validation" list97- Report overall confidence = weighted average of dimension confidences98- Show confidence level alongside each dimension score in the report99100## Gemini Output Schema101102When scoring with evidence weighting, use this schema structure:103104```json105{106 "dimension_name": "market_sizing",107 "raw_score": 8,108 "evidence_tier": "cited",109 "evidence_weight": 1.0,110 "weighted_score": 8.0,111 "confidence_level": 4,112 "sources": ["IDC 2025 SaaS report", "Gartner Magic Quadrant"],113 "bias_flags": []114}115```116117## Implementation Checklist118119- [ ] Evidence tier classification logic in scoring agent prompt120- [ ] Bias detection rules in scoring agent prompt (6 types)121- [ ] Confidence level calculation per dimension122- [ ] Evidence tier badges in report UI (3 colored pills)123- [ ] Bias flag banner in report UI (amber warning strip)124- [ ] Weighted score calculation applied to all 7/9 dimensions125- [ ] "Needs validation" list generated for Level 1 confidence dimensions