How do I install the Phase Gated Debugging skill?

Run npx skillmds@latest add anhvu1107/phase-gated-debugging in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.

Is Phase Gated Debugging safe to use?

This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.

Which AI agents work with Phase Gated Debugging?

This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.

Is Phase Gated Debugging free to use?

Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free, and the skill stays under its author's original license.

Who published Phase Gated Debugging?

anhvu1107 (@anhvu1107) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.

Phase Gated Debugging by anhvu1107 — Agent Skill

Name: Phase Gated Debugging
Author: anhvu1107

Phase Gated Debugging

ALWAYS use this when the user mentions Phase Gated Debugging, asks to build, debug, review, document, automate, test, configure, migrate, or make decisions in this domain, or the task clearly depends on Phase Gated Debugging; scope: Use when debugging any bug. Apply the bundled workflow, references, scripts, Senior Master standard, and Codex strict review gate before final output.

anhvu1107 f3065ef 6 files · 7.6 KB Updated Sep 17, 2026

File contents

Phase-Gated Debugging

Selective Reading Rule

Start with:

references/senior-master-standard.md
references/usage-routing.md
references/quality-checklist.md

Then load only the inherited docs, scripts, assets, or examples that match the user's actual task.

Overview

AI coding agents see an error and immediately edit code. They guess at fixes, get it wrong, and spiral. This skill enforces a strict 5-phase protocol where you CANNOT edit source code until the root cause is identified and confirmed.

Based on claude-debug (full plugin with PreToolUse hook enforcement).

When to Use

Use this skill when:

a bug keeps getting "fixed" without resolving the underlying issue
you need to slow an agent down and force disciplined debugging before code edits
the failure is intermittent, a regression, performance-related, or otherwise hard to isolate
you want an explicit user confirmation checkpoint before any fix is applied

The Protocol

Phase 1: REPRODUCE

Run the failing command/test. Capture the exact error. Run 2-3 times for consistency.

Do NOT read source code
Do NOT hypothesize
Do NOT edit any files

Phase 2: ISOLATE

Read code. Add diagnostic logging marked // DEBUG. Re-run with diagnostics. Binary search to narrow down.

Only // DEBUG marked logging is allowed
Do NOT fix the bug even if you see it

Phase 3: ROOT CAUSE

Analyze WHY at the isolated location. Use "5 Whys" technique. Remove debug logging.

State: "This is my root cause analysis: [explanation]. Do you agree, or should I investigate further?"

WAIT for user confirmation. Do NOT proceed without it.

Phase 4: FIX

Remove all // DEBUG lines. Apply minimal change addressing confirmed root cause.

Only edit files related to root cause
Do NOT refactor unrelated code

Phase 5: VERIFY

Run original failing test — must pass. Run related tests. For intermittent bugs, run 5+ times. If verification fails: root cause was wrong, go back to Phase 2.

Bug-Type Strategies

Type	Technique
Crash/Panic	Stack trace backward — trace the bad value to its source
Wrong Output	Binary search — log midpoint, halve search space each iteration
Intermittent	Compare passing vs failing run logs — find ordering divergence
Regression	`git bisect` — find the offending commit
Performance	Timing at stage boundaries — find the bottleneck

Key Rules

NEVER edit source code in phases 1-3 (except // DEBUG in phase 2)
NEVER proceed past phase 3 without user confirmation
ALWAYS reproduce before investigating
ALWAYS verify after fixing

Limitations

Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

---name: phase-gated-debuggingdescription: ALWAYS use this when the user mentions Phase Gated Debugging, asks to build, debug, review, document, automate, test, configure, migrate, or make decisions in this domain, or the task clearly depends on Phase Gated Debugging; scope: Use when debugging any bug. Apply the bundled workflow, references, scripts, Senior Master standard, and Codex strict review gate before final output.---# Phase-Gated Debugging## Selective Reading RuleStart with:- `references/senior-master-standard.md`- `references/usage-routing.md`- `references/quality-checklist.md`Then load only the inherited docs, scripts, assets, or examples that match the user's actual task.## OverviewAI coding agents see an error and immediately edit code. They guess at fixes, get it wrong, and spiral. This skill enforces a strict 5-phase protocol where you CANNOT edit source code until the root cause is identified and confirmed.Based on [claude-debug](https://github.com/krabat-l/claude-debug) (full plugin with PreToolUse hook enforcement).## When to UseUse this skill when:- a bug keeps getting "fixed" without resolving the underlying issue- you need to slow an agent down and force disciplined debugging before code edits- the failure is intermittent, a regression, performance-related, or otherwise hard to isolate- you want an explicit user confirmation checkpoint before any fix is applied## The Protocol### Phase 1: REPRODUCERun the failing command/test. Capture the exact error. Run 2-3 times for consistency.- Do NOT read source code- Do NOT hypothesize- Do NOT edit any files### Phase 2: ISOLATERead code. Add diagnostic logging marked `// DEBUG`. Re-run with diagnostics. Binary search to narrow down.- Only `// DEBUG` marked logging is allowed- Do NOT fix the bug even if you see it### Phase 3: ROOT CAUSEAnalyze WHY at the isolated location. Use "5 Whys" technique. Remove debug logging.State: "This is my root cause analysis: [explanation]. Do you agree, or should I investigate further?"**WAIT for user confirmation. Do NOT proceed without it.**### Phase 4: FIXRemove all `// DEBUG` lines. Apply minimal change addressing confirmed root cause.- Only edit files related to root cause- Do NOT refactor unrelated code### Phase 5: VERIFYRun original failing test — must pass. Run related tests. For intermittent bugs, run 5+ times.If verification fails: root cause was wrong, go back to Phase 2.## Bug-Type Strategies| Type | Technique ||------|-----------|| Crash/Panic | Stack trace backward — trace the bad value to its source || Wrong Output | Binary search — log midpoint, halve search space each iteration || Intermittent | Compare passing vs failing run logs — find ordering divergence || Regression | `git bisect` — find the offending commit || Performance | Timing at stage boundaries — find the bottleneck |## Key Rules1. NEVER edit source code in phases 1-3 (except `// DEBUG` in phase 2)2. NEVER proceed past phase 3 without user confirmation3. ALWAYS reproduce before investigating4. ALWAYS verify after fixing## Limitations- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

Frequently asked questions