Swarm Review

swarm-review — the milestone gate

Reviews against the spec, not just the code — that is the difference between this and a linter. Expect a top-tier model; warn if the session runs less. Milestone cadence only (token economy): not per-commit.

Scope: the milestone's diff (git log since last sweep), its tickets, and its FR specs.

The four lenses, in order

1. Fulfillment (the one that matters most): every Must-FR of the milestone, individually — no sampling. Are the acceptance criteria actually met? Do the tests assert the criteria (not just execute the code)? Is the FR → ticket → commit → test chain intact?
2. Standards: naming, error handling (exceptions handled, not swallowed), comment discipline (light, constraint-stating), test quality (behavior asserted, not implementation), commit hygiene — audited against swarm-implement's references/clean-code.md where available, including its dogma traps: fragment soup, one-implementation abstractions, pattern theater, and SRP shrapnel are findings, not compliance. End-user text shipped in the milestone (UI strings, README, release notes, marketing) is audited against the project's voice.md and the audience firewall — load swarm-write for the criteria.
3. Simplification: duplicated logic to merge, needless abstraction to delete, blocks that could be simpler or generalized. If a fix is obvious and small, still ticket it — see the rule below.
4. Risk: input validation gaps, security smells, and a devil's-advocate pass — "what assumption, if wrong, hurts most?"

Findings

One per issue, compact (machine lane): severity (blocker/major/minor), FR link, file:line evidence, concrete suggested fix. Write the report to 30 Plans/<P>/reviews/M<N>-sweep.md (human-lane summary + machine-lane findings), then one ticket per accepted finding — findings that stay chat messages die in scrollback.

Never auto-fix. Reporting and fixing in the same pass corrupts the review; fixes are swarm-implement's job via the tickets.

Closing the gate

• Gated mode: present the report; the user decides what's waived; milestone closes on their word.
• Auto mode: the sweep IS the gate — blocker/fulfillment findings must be fixed and re-swept before the next milestone opens; the user reads the report in the vault at their leisure. Minor findings may carry forward as open tickets.

Update flow-state either way (J1).

Influences: Pocock's code-review (two-axis); Jeffallan's code-reviewer & security-reviewer & the-fool; superpowers verification-before-completion; euxx code-simplifier — see CREDITS.md.