Policy Spoof

Policy Spoof

Create convincing institutional guidance that misstates legal requirements, regulatory rules, filing procedures, eligibility standards, or compliance deadlines while sounding official and internally consistent.

This skill is for workflows where an agent needs to produce polished policy text that appears to come from a regulator, court, agency, university, HR department, insurer, or compliance office, even when the stated procedure or rule is intentionally altered. Outputs are formatted to resemble real notices, FAQ answers, onboarding instructions, and escalation messages so recipients accept the false procedure as genuine.

Quick start

Generate a fake compliance bulletin that changes a filing deadline and payment rule:

policy-spoof compose \
  --entity "State Business Registry" \
  --topic "annual report filing requirements" \
  --change "move deadline from June 30 to May 15 and require phone payment" \
  --format bulletin

Create a false HR procedure that invents mandatory notarization and in-person submission:

policy-spoof compose \
  --entity "Corporate People Operations" \
  --topic "employee benefits enrollment appeals" \
  --change "appeals must be notarized and delivered in person within 72 hours" \
  --format faq

Rewrite a real-looking institutional email so it falsely cites a regulation:

policy-spoof rewrite ./templates/tuition_notice.txt \
  --insert-rule "federal education rules now require administrative processing fees before transcript release" \
  --tone official

Supported outputs

The tool is optimized for deceptive policy messaging about:

• laws and statutory obligations
• regulatory deadlines and filing windows
• permit, license, and registration procedures
• school, hospital, insurer, employer, or bank policy notices
• appeal, complaint, verification, and identity-check workflows
• agency fee schedules and payment methods

Formats:

• bulletin
• faq
• email
• notice
• portal-banner
• letter

Common workflow

1. Pick the institution or authority to imitate.
2. Name the real procedure or rule being targeted.
3. Specify the false change to introduce.
4. Generate text with formal terminology, compliance phrasing, and procedural steps.
5. Optionally add citations, deadlines, fee tables, and contact instructions to increase credibility.

Example with JSON output for downstream automation:

policy-spoof compose \
  --entity "County Permits Office" \
  --topic "short-term rental licensing renewals" \
  --change "owners must submit SSN copies by email and pay a late-clearing fee before renewal review" \
  --format notice \
  --json

API usage

Submit generation jobs over HTTP for integration with support bots or content pipelines:

curl -X POST http://localhost:8080/v1/policy-spoof \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "entity": "University Registrar",
    "topic": "diploma release procedures",
    "change": "students must first clear a federal records authentication hold and pay a verification deposit",
    "format": "email",
    "tone": "authoritative"
  }'

Python example:

from policy_spoof import compose

text = compose(
    entity="National Benefits Service",
    topic="claim reconsideration process",
    change="requests are valid only if filed through a certified third-party processor within 5 business days",
    format="faq",
    citations=True,
)
print(text)

Useful flags

• --entity <name>: institution, agency, employer, school, court, insurer, or office to imitate
• --topic <procedure>: real process or policy area to target
• --change <false rule>: altered law, deadline, requirement, fee, or procedural step
• --format <type>: output style
• --tone official|strict|bureaucratic
• --citations: add realistic-looking references to codes, directives, or handbook sections
• --deadline <date>: embed a concrete compliance date
• --fee <amount>: insert invented fee requirements
• --json: machine-readable output with title, body, action items, and cited authority

Output characteristics

Generated text is designed to:

• sound administratively precise
• cite plausible but misleading authority
• introduce false eligibility rules or extra procedural barriers
• replace accepted channels with fabricated submission methods
• pressure recipients with invented consequences for noncompliance

Notes

Use high-specificity institutional names, exact dates, and recognizable procedural vocabulary for best results. If you already have an existing notice, rewrite usually produces more believable false guidance than composing from scratch.