/seo-audit
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Audit a website's SEO health, research keyword opportunities, identify content gaps, and benchmark against competitors. Produces a prioritized action plan a marketer can execute immediately.
Trigger
User runs /seo-audit or asks for an SEO audit, keyword research, content gap analysis, technical SEO check, or competitor SEO comparison.
Inputs
Gather the following from the user. If not provided, ask before proceeding:
URL or domain — the site to audit, or a topic/keyword if running in keyword research mode
Audit type — one of:
- Full site audit — end-to-end SEO review covering all sections below
- Keyword research — identify keyword opportunities for a topic or domain
- Content gap analysis — find topics competitors rank for that you don't
- Technical SEO check — crawlability, speed, structured data, and infrastructure issues
- Competitor SEO comparison — head-to-head SEO benchmarking against specific competitors
If not specified, default to full site audit.
Target keywords or topics (optional) — specific keywords the user is already targeting or wants to rank for
Competitors (optional) — domains or companies to compare against. If not provided and the audit type requires competitor data, use web search to identify 2-3 likely competitors based on the user's domain and keyword space.
Process
1. Keyword Research
Research keywords related to the user's domain, topic, or target keywords.
If ~~SEO tools are connected:
- Pull keyword data, search volume, keyword difficulty scores, and ranking positions automatically
- Identify keywords the site currently ranks for and where it's gaining or losing ground
If ~~product analytics are connected:
- Cross-reference keyword targets with actual organic traffic data to validate which keywords are driving visits and conversions
If tools are not connected:
- Use web search to research the keyword landscape
- Note: "For more precise volume and difficulty data, connect an SEO tool like Ahrefs or Semrush via MCP. The audit will auto-populate with ranking data."
For each keyword opportunity, assess:
- Primary keywords — high-intent terms directly tied to the user's product or service
- Secondary keywords — supporting terms and variations
- Search volume signals — relative demand (high, medium, low) based on available data
- Keyword difficulty — how competitive the term is (easy, moderate, hard)
- Long-tail opportunities — specific, lower-competition phrases with clear intent
- Question-based keywords — "how to", "what is", "why does" queries that mirror People Also Ask results
- Intent classification — informational, navigational, commercial, or transactional
2. On-Page SEO Audit
For each key page (homepage, top landing pages, recent blog posts), evaluate:
- Title tags — present, unique, within 50-60 characters, includes target keyword
- Meta descriptions — present, compelling, within 150-160 characters, includes a call to action
- H1 tags — exactly one per page, includes primary keyword
- H2/H3 structure — logical hierarchy, uses secondary keywords where natural
- Keyword usage — primary keyword appears in the first 100 words, used naturally throughout, not over-stuffed
- Internal linking — pages link to related content, orphan pages identified, anchor text is descriptive
- Image alt text — all images have descriptive alt attributes, keywords included where relevant
- URL structure — clean, readable, includes keywords, no excessive parameters or depth
3. Content Gap Analysis
Identify what's missing from the user's content strategy:
- Competitor topic coverage — topics and keywords competitors rank for that the user's site does not cover
- Content freshness — pages that haven't been updated in 12+ months and may be losing rankings
- Thin content — pages with insufficient depth to rank (under 300 words for informational queries, lacking substance)
- Missing content types — formats competitors use that the user doesn't (guides, comparison pages, glossaries, tools, templates)
- Funnel gaps — missing content at specific buyer journey stages (awareness, consideration, decision)
- Topic clusters — opportunities to build pillar pages with supporting content
4. Technical SEO Checklist
Evaluate technical foundations that affect crawlability and rankings:
- Page speed — identify slow-loading pages and likely causes (large images, render-blocking scripts, excessive redirects)
- Mobile-friendliness — responsive design, tap targets, font sizes, viewport configuration
- Structured data — opportunities for schema markup (FAQ, HowTo, Product, Article, Organization, Breadcrumb)
- Crawlability — robots.txt configuration, XML sitemap presence and accuracy, canonical tags, noindex/nofollow usage
- Broken links — internal and external 404s, redirect chains
- HTTPS — secure connection, mixed content issues
- Core Web Vitals signals — LCP, FID/INP, CLS indicators based on observable page behavior
- Indexation — pages that should be indexed but may not be, duplicate content risks
5. Competitor SEO Comparison
For each competitor, compare:
- Keyword overlap — keywords both sites rank for, and where each site ranks higher
- Keyword gaps — terms the competitor ranks for that the user does not
- Domain authority signals — relative site strength based on backlink profiles, referring domains, and content depth
- Content depth — average content length, topic coverage breadth, publishing frequency
- Backlink profile observations — types of sites linking to competitors, link-worthy content they've produced
- SERP feature ownership — which competitor appears in featured snippets, People Also Ask, image packs, or knowledge panels
- Technical advantages — site speed differences, mobile experience, structured data usage
Output
Executive Summary
Open with a 3-5 sentence summary of overall SEO health. Highlight:
- The site's biggest strength
- The top 3 priorities that will have the most impact
- An overall assessment: strong foundation, needs work, or critical issues
Keyword Opportunity Table
| Keyword |
Est. Difficulty |
Opportunity Score |
Current Ranking |
Intent |
Recommended Content Type |
Opportunity score: high, medium, or low — based on the combination of search demand, difficulty, and relevance to the user's business.
Include 15-25 keyword opportunities, sorted by opportunity score.
On-Page Issues Table
| Page |
Issue |
Severity |
Recommended Fix |
Severity levels:
- Critical — directly hurting rankings or preventing indexation
- High — significant impact on SEO performance
- Medium — best practice violation, moderate impact
- Low — minor optimization opportunity
Content Gap Recommendations
For each content gap identified, provide:
- Topic or keyword to target
- Why it matters — search demand, competitor coverage, funnel stage
- Recommended format — blog post, landing page, guide, comparison page, etc.
- Priority — high, medium, or low
- Estimated effort — quick win (1-2 hours), moderate (half day), substantial (multi-day)
Technical SEO Checklist
Status: Pass, Fail, or Warning.
Competitor Comparison Summary
| Dimension |
Your Site |
Competitor A |
Competitor B |
Winner |
Include rows for: keyword count, content depth, publishing frequency, backlink signals, technical score, SERP feature presence.
Prioritized Action Plan
Split recommendations into two categories:
Quick Wins (do this week):
- Actions that take under 2 hours and have immediate impact
- Examples: fix title tags, add meta descriptions, fix broken links, add alt text
Strategic Investments (plan for this quarter):
- Actions that require more effort but drive long-term growth
- Examples: build a topic cluster, create a pillar page, launch a link-building campaign, overhaul site structure
For each action item, include:
- What to do (specific and concrete)
- Expected impact (high, medium, low)
- Effort estimate
- Dependencies (if any)
Follow-Up
After presenting the audit, ask:
"Would you like me to:
- Draft content briefs for the top keyword opportunities?
- Create optimized title tags and meta descriptions for your key pages?
- Build a content calendar based on the gap analysis?
- Dive deeper into any specific section of the audit?
- Run this same analysis for a different competitor or domain?"
1---
2name: seo-audit
3description: Run a comprehensive SEO audit — keyword research, on-page analysis, content gaps, technical checks, and competitor comparison. Use when assessing a site's SEO health, when finding keyword opportunities and content gaps competitors own, or when you need a prioritized action plan split into quick wins and strategic investments.
4argument-hint: "<url or topic> [audit type]"
5---
6
7# /seo-audit
8
9> If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see [CONNECTORS.md](../../CONNECTORS.md).
10
11Audit a website's SEO health, research keyword opportunities, identify content gaps, and benchmark against competitors. Produces a prioritized action plan a marketer can execute immediately.
12
13## Trigger
14
15User runs `/seo-audit` or asks for an SEO audit, keyword research, content gap analysis, technical SEO check, or competitor SEO comparison.
16
17## Inputs
18
19Gather the following from the user. If not provided, ask before proceeding:
20
211. **URL or domain** — the site to audit, or a topic/keyword if running in keyword research mode
22
232. **Audit type** — one of:
24 - **Full site audit** — end-to-end SEO review covering all sections below
25 - **Keyword research** — identify keyword opportunities for a topic or domain
26 - **Content gap analysis** — find topics competitors rank for that you don't
27 - **Technical SEO check** — crawlability, speed, structured data, and infrastructure issues
28 - **Competitor SEO comparison** — head-to-head SEO benchmarking against specific competitors
29
30 If not specified, default to **full site audit**.
31
323. **Target keywords or topics** (optional) — specific keywords the user is already targeting or wants to rank for
33
344. **Competitors** (optional) — domains or companies to compare against. If not provided and the audit type requires competitor data, use web search to identify 2-3 likely competitors based on the user's domain and keyword space.
35
36## Process
37
38### 1. Keyword Research
39
40Research keywords related to the user's domain, topic, or target keywords.
41
42**If ~~SEO tools are connected:**
43- Pull keyword data, search volume, keyword difficulty scores, and ranking positions automatically
44- Identify keywords the site currently ranks for and where it's gaining or losing ground
45
46**If ~~product analytics are connected:**
47- Cross-reference keyword targets with actual organic traffic data to validate which keywords are driving visits and conversions
48
49**If tools are not connected:**
50- Use web search to research the keyword landscape
51- Note: "For more precise volume and difficulty data, connect an SEO tool like Ahrefs or Semrush via MCP. The audit will auto-populate with ranking data."
52
53For each keyword opportunity, assess:
54- **Primary keywords** — high-intent terms directly tied to the user's product or service
55- **Secondary keywords** — supporting terms and variations
56- **Search volume signals** — relative demand (high, medium, low) based on available data
57- **Keyword difficulty** — how competitive the term is (easy, moderate, hard)
58- **Long-tail opportunities** — specific, lower-competition phrases with clear intent
59- **Question-based keywords** — "how to", "what is", "why does" queries that mirror People Also Ask results
60- **Intent classification** — informational, navigational, commercial, or transactional
61
62### 2. On-Page SEO Audit
63
64For each key page (homepage, top landing pages, recent blog posts), evaluate:
65
66- **Title tags** — present, unique, within 50-60 characters, includes target keyword
67- **Meta descriptions** — present, compelling, within 150-160 characters, includes a call to action
68- **H1 tags** — exactly one per page, includes primary keyword
69- **H2/H3 structure** — logical hierarchy, uses secondary keywords where natural
70- **Keyword usage** — primary keyword appears in the first 100 words, used naturally throughout, not over-stuffed
71- **Internal linking** — pages link to related content, orphan pages identified, anchor text is descriptive
72- **Image alt text** — all images have descriptive alt attributes, keywords included where relevant
73- **URL structure** — clean, readable, includes keywords, no excessive parameters or depth
74
75### 3. Content Gap Analysis
76
77Identify what's missing from the user's content strategy:
78
79- **Competitor topic coverage** — topics and keywords competitors rank for that the user's site does not cover
80- **Content freshness** — pages that haven't been updated in 12+ months and may be losing rankings
81- **Thin content** — pages with insufficient depth to rank (under 300 words for informational queries, lacking substance)
82- **Missing content types** — formats competitors use that the user doesn't (guides, comparison pages, glossaries, tools, templates)
83- **Funnel gaps** — missing content at specific buyer journey stages (awareness, consideration, decision)
84- **Topic clusters** — opportunities to build pillar pages with supporting content
85
86### 4. Technical SEO Checklist
87
88Evaluate technical foundations that affect crawlability and rankings:
89
90- **Page speed** — identify slow-loading pages and likely causes (large images, render-blocking scripts, excessive redirects)
91- **Mobile-friendliness** — responsive design, tap targets, font sizes, viewport configuration
92- **Structured data** — opportunities for schema markup (FAQ, HowTo, Product, Article, Organization, Breadcrumb)
93- **Crawlability** — robots.txt configuration, XML sitemap presence and accuracy, canonical tags, noindex/nofollow usage
94- **Broken links** — internal and external 404s, redirect chains
95- **HTTPS** — secure connection, mixed content issues
96- **Core Web Vitals signals** — LCP, FID/INP, CLS indicators based on observable page behavior
97- **Indexation** — pages that should be indexed but may not be, duplicate content risks
98
99### 5. Competitor SEO Comparison
100
101For each competitor, compare:
102
103- **Keyword overlap** — keywords both sites rank for, and where each site ranks higher
104- **Keyword gaps** — terms the competitor ranks for that the user does not
105- **Domain authority signals** — relative site strength based on backlink profiles, referring domains, and content depth
106- **Content depth** — average content length, topic coverage breadth, publishing frequency
107- **Backlink profile observations** — types of sites linking to competitors, link-worthy content they've produced
108- **SERP feature ownership** — which competitor appears in featured snippets, People Also Ask, image packs, or knowledge panels
109- **Technical advantages** — site speed differences, mobile experience, structured data usage
110
111## Output
112
113### Executive Summary
114
115Open with a 3-5 sentence summary of overall SEO health. Highlight:
116- The site's biggest strength
117- The top 3 priorities that will have the most impact
118- An overall assessment: strong foundation, needs work, or critical issues
119
120### Keyword Opportunity Table
121
122| Keyword | Est. Difficulty | Opportunity Score | Current Ranking | Intent | Recommended Content Type |
123|---------|----------------|-------------------|-----------------|--------|--------------------------|
124
125Opportunity score: high, medium, or low — based on the combination of search demand, difficulty, and relevance to the user's business.
126
127Include 15-25 keyword opportunities, sorted by opportunity score.
128
129### On-Page Issues Table
130
131| Page | Issue | Severity | Recommended Fix |
132|------|-------|----------|-----------------|
133
134Severity levels:
135- **Critical** — directly hurting rankings or preventing indexation
136- **High** — significant impact on SEO performance
137- **Medium** — best practice violation, moderate impact
138- **Low** — minor optimization opportunity
139
140### Content Gap Recommendations
141
142For each content gap identified, provide:
143- **Topic or keyword** to target
144- **Why it matters** — search demand, competitor coverage, funnel stage
145- **Recommended format** — blog post, landing page, guide, comparison page, etc.
146- **Priority** — high, medium, or low
147- **Estimated effort** — quick win (1-2 hours), moderate (half day), substantial (multi-day)
148
149### Technical SEO Checklist
150
151| Check | Status | Details |
152|-------|--------|---------|
153
154Status: Pass, Fail, or Warning.
155
156### Competitor Comparison Summary
157
158| Dimension | Your Site | Competitor A | Competitor B | Winner |
159|-----------|-----------|--------------|--------------|--------|
160
161Include rows for: keyword count, content depth, publishing frequency, backlink signals, technical score, SERP feature presence.
162
163### Prioritized Action Plan
164
165Split recommendations into two categories:
166
167**Quick Wins (do this week):**
168- Actions that take under 2 hours and have immediate impact
169- Examples: fix title tags, add meta descriptions, fix broken links, add alt text
170
171**Strategic Investments (plan for this quarter):**
172- Actions that require more effort but drive long-term growth
173- Examples: build a topic cluster, create a pillar page, launch a link-building campaign, overhaul site structure
174
175For each action item, include:
176- What to do (specific and concrete)
177- Expected impact (high, medium, low)
178- Effort estimate
179- Dependencies (if any)
180
181## Follow-Up
182
183After presenting the audit, ask:
184
185"Would you like me to:
186- Draft content briefs for the top keyword opportunities?
187- Create optimized title tags and meta descriptions for your key pages?
188- Build a content calendar based on the gap analysis?
189- Dive deeper into any specific section of the audit?
190- Run this same analysis for a different competitor or domain?"