/ticket-triage
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Categorize, prioritize, and route an incoming support ticket or customer issue. Produces a structured triage assessment with a suggested initial response.
Usage
/ticket-triage <ticket text, customer message, or issue description>
Examples:
/ticket-triage Customer says their dashboard has been showing a blank page since this morning
/ticket-triage "I was charged twice for my subscription this month"
/ticket-triage User can't connect their SSO — getting a 403 error on the callback URL
/ticket-triage Feature request: they want to export reports as PDF
Workflow
1. Parse the Issue
Read the input and extract:
- Core problem: What is the customer actually experiencing?
- Symptoms: What specific behavior or error are they seeing?
- Customer context: Who is this? Any account details, plan level, or history available?
- Urgency signals: Are they blocked? Is this production? How many users affected?
- Emotional state: Frustrated, confused, matter-of-fact, escalating?
2. Categorize and Prioritize
Using the category taxonomy and priority framework below:
- Assign a primary category (bug, how-to, feature request, billing, account, integration, security, data, performance) and an optional secondary category
- Assign a priority (P1–P4) based on impact and urgency
- Identify the product area the issue maps to
3. Check for Duplicates and Known Issues
Before routing, check available sources:
- ~~support platform: Search for similar open or recently resolved tickets
- ~~knowledge base: Check for known issues or existing documentation
- ~~project tracker: Check if there's an existing bug report or feature request
Apply the duplicate detection process below.
4. Determine Routing
Using the routing rules below, recommend which team or queue should handle this based on category and complexity.
5. Generate Triage Output
## Triage: [One-line issue summary]
**Category:** [Primary] / [Secondary if applicable]
**Priority:** [P1-P4] — [Brief justification]
**Product area:** [Area/team]
### Issue Summary
[2-3 sentence summary of what the customer is experiencing]
### Key Details
- **Customer:** [Name/account if known]
- **Impact:** [Who and what is affected]
- **Workaround:** [Available / Not available / Unknown]
- **Related tickets:** [Links to similar issues if found]
- **Known issue:** [Yes — link / No / Checking]
### Routing Recommendation
**Route to:** [Team or queue]
**Why:** [Brief reasoning]
### Suggested Initial Response
[Draft first response to the customer — acknowledge the issue,
set expectations, provide workaround if available.
Use the auto-response templates below as a starting point.]
### Internal Notes
- [Any additional context for the agent picking this up]
- [Reproduction hints if it's a bug]
- [Escalation triggers to watch for]
6. Offer Next Steps
After presenting the triage:
- "Want me to draft a full response to the customer?"
- "Should I search for more context on this issue?"
- "Want me to check if this is a known bug in the tracker?"
- "Should I escalate this? I can package it with /customer-escalation."
Category Taxonomy
Assign every ticket a primary category and optionally a secondary category:
| Category |
Description |
Signal Words |
| Bug |
Product is behaving incorrectly or unexpectedly |
Error, broken, crash, not working, unexpected, wrong, failing |
| How-to |
Customer needs guidance on using the product |
How do I, can I, where is, setting up, configure, help with |
| Feature request |
Customer wants a capability that doesn't exist |
Would be great if, wish I could, any plans to, requesting |
| Billing |
Payment, subscription, invoice, or pricing issues |
Charge, invoice, payment, subscription, refund, upgrade, downgrade |
| Account |
Account access, permissions, settings, or user management |
Login, password, access, permission, SSO, locked out, can't sign in |
| Integration |
Issues connecting to third-party tools or APIs |
API, webhook, integration, connect, OAuth, sync, third-party |
| Security |
Security concerns, data access, or compliance questions |
Data breach, unauthorized, compliance, GDPR, SOC 2, vulnerability |
| Data |
Data quality, migration, import/export issues |
Missing data, export, import, migration, incorrect data, duplicates |
| Performance |
Speed, reliability, or availability issues |
Slow, timeout, latency, down, unavailable, degraded |
Category Determination Tips
- If the customer reports both a bug and a feature request, the bug is primary
- If they can't log in due to a bug, category is Bug (not Account) — root cause drives the category
- "It used to work and now it doesn't" = Bug
- "I want it to work differently" = Feature request
- "How do I make it work?" = How-to
- When in doubt, lean toward Bug — it's better to investigate than dismiss
Priority Framework
P1 — Critical
Criteria: Production system down, data loss or corruption, security breach, all or most users affected.
- The customer cannot use the product at all
- Data is being lost, corrupted, or exposed
- A security incident is in progress
- The issue is worsening or expanding in scope
SLA expectation: Respond within 1 hour. Continuous work until resolved or mitigated. Updates every 1-2 hours.
P2 — High
Criteria: Major feature broken, significant workflow blocked, many users affected, no workaround.
- A core workflow is broken but the product is partially usable
- Multiple users are affected or a key account is impacted
- The issue is blocking time-sensitive work
- No reasonable workaround exists
SLA expectation: Respond within 4 hours. Active investigation same day. Updates every 4 hours.
P3 — Medium
Criteria: Feature partially broken, workaround available, single user or small team affected.
- A feature isn't working correctly but a workaround exists
- The issue is inconvenient but not blocking critical work
- A single user or small team is affected
- The customer is not escalating urgently
SLA expectation: Respond within 1 business day. Resolution or update within 3 business days.
P4 — Low
Criteria: Minor inconvenience, cosmetic issue, general question, feature request.
- Cosmetic or UI issues that don't affect functionality
- Feature requests and enhancement ideas
- General questions or how-to inquiries
- Issues with simple, documented solutions
SLA expectation: Respond within 2 business days. Resolution at normal pace.
Priority Escalation Triggers
Automatically bump priority up when:
- Customer has been waiting longer than the SLA allows
- Multiple customers report the same issue (pattern detected)
- The customer explicitly escalates or mentions executive involvement
- A workaround that was in place stops working
- The issue expands in scope (more users, more data, new symptoms)
Routing Rules
Route tickets based on category and complexity:
| Route to |
When |
| Tier 1 (frontline support) |
How-to questions, known issues with documented solutions, billing inquiries, password resets |
| Tier 2 (senior support) |
Bugs requiring investigation, complex configuration, integration troubleshooting, account issues |
| Engineering |
Confirmed bugs needing code fixes, infrastructure issues, performance degradation |
| Product |
Feature requests with significant demand, design decisions, workflow gaps |
| Security |
Data access concerns, vulnerability reports, compliance questions |
| Billing/Finance |
Refund requests, contract disputes, complex billing adjustments |
Duplicate Detection
Before creating a new ticket or routing, check for duplicates:
- Search by symptom: Look for tickets with similar error messages or descriptions
- Search by customer: Check if this customer has an open ticket for the same issue
- Search by product area: Look for recent tickets in the same feature area
- Check known issues: Compare against documented known issues
If a duplicate is found:
- Link the new ticket to the existing one
- Notify the customer that this is a known issue being tracked
- Add any new information from the new report to the existing ticket
- Bump priority if the new report adds urgency (more customers affected, etc.)
Auto-Response Templates by Category
Bug — Initial Response
Thank you for reporting this. I can see how [specific impact]
would be disruptive for your work.
I've logged this as a [priority] issue and our team is
investigating. [If workaround exists: "In the meantime, you
can [workaround]."]
I'll update you within [SLA timeframe] with what we find.
How-to — Initial Response
Great question! [Direct answer or link to documentation]
[If more complex: "Let me walk you through the steps:"]
[Steps or guidance]
Let me know if that helps, or if you have any follow-up
questions.
Feature Request — Initial Response
Thank you for this suggestion — I can see why [capability]
would be valuable for your workflow.
I've documented this and shared it with our product team.
While I can't commit to a specific timeline, your feedback
directly informs our roadmap priorities.
[If alternative exists: "In the meantime, you might find
[alternative] helpful for achieving something similar."]
Billing — Initial Response
I understand billing issues need prompt attention. Let me
look into this for you.
[If straightforward: resolution details]
[If complex: "I'm reviewing your account now and will have
an answer for you within [timeframe]."]
Security — Initial Response
Thank you for flagging this — we take security concerns
seriously and are reviewing this immediately.
I've escalated this to our security team for investigation.
We'll follow up with you within [timeframe] with our findings.
[If action is needed: "In the meantime, we recommend
[protective action]."]
Triage Best Practices
- Read the full ticket before categorizing — context in later messages often changes the assessment
- Categorize by root cause, not just the symptom described
- When in doubt on priority, err on the side of higher — it's easier to de-escalate than to recover from a missed SLA
- Always check for duplicates and known issues before routing
- Write internal notes that help the next person pick up context quickly
- Include what you've already checked or ruled out to avoid duplicate investigation
- Flag patterns — if you're seeing the same issue repeatedly, escalate the pattern even if individual tickets are low priority
1---
2name: ticket-triage
3description: Triage and prioritize a support ticket or customer issue. Use when a new ticket comes in and needs categorization, assigning P1-P4 priority, deciding which team should handle it, or checking whether it's a duplicate or known issue before routing.
4argument-hint: "<ticket or issue description>"
5---
6
7# /ticket-triage
8
9> If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see [CONNECTORS.md](../../CONNECTORS.md).
10
11Categorize, prioritize, and route an incoming support ticket or customer issue. Produces a structured triage assessment with a suggested initial response.
12
13## Usage
14
15```
16/ticket-triage <ticket text, customer message, or issue description>
17```
18
19Examples:
20- `/ticket-triage Customer says their dashboard has been showing a blank page since this morning`
21- `/ticket-triage "I was charged twice for my subscription this month"`
22- `/ticket-triage User can't connect their SSO — getting a 403 error on the callback URL`
23- `/ticket-triage Feature request: they want to export reports as PDF`
24
25## Workflow
26
27### 1. Parse the Issue
28
29Read the input and extract:
30
31- **Core problem**: What is the customer actually experiencing?
32- **Symptoms**: What specific behavior or error are they seeing?
33- **Customer context**: Who is this? Any account details, plan level, or history available?
34- **Urgency signals**: Are they blocked? Is this production? How many users affected?
35- **Emotional state**: Frustrated, confused, matter-of-fact, escalating?
36
37### 2. Categorize and Prioritize
38
39Using the category taxonomy and priority framework below:
40
41- Assign a **primary category** (bug, how-to, feature request, billing, account, integration, security, data, performance) and an optional secondary category
42- Assign a **priority** (P1–P4) based on impact and urgency
43- Identify the **product area** the issue maps to
44
45### 3. Check for Duplicates and Known Issues
46
47Before routing, check available sources:
48
49- **~~support platform**: Search for similar open or recently resolved tickets
50- **~~knowledge base**: Check for known issues or existing documentation
51- **~~project tracker**: Check if there's an existing bug report or feature request
52
53Apply the duplicate detection process below.
54
55### 4. Determine Routing
56
57Using the routing rules below, recommend which team or queue should handle this based on category and complexity.
58
59### 5. Generate Triage Output
60
61```
62## Triage: [One-line issue summary]
63
64**Category:** [Primary] / [Secondary if applicable]
65**Priority:** [P1-P4] — [Brief justification]
66**Product area:** [Area/team]
67
68### Issue Summary
69[2-3 sentence summary of what the customer is experiencing]
70
71### Key Details
72- **Customer:** [Name/account if known]
73- **Impact:** [Who and what is affected]
74- **Workaround:** [Available / Not available / Unknown]
75- **Related tickets:** [Links to similar issues if found]
76- **Known issue:** [Yes — link / No / Checking]
77
78### Routing Recommendation
79**Route to:** [Team or queue]
80**Why:** [Brief reasoning]
81
82### Suggested Initial Response
83[Draft first response to the customer — acknowledge the issue,
84set expectations, provide workaround if available.
85Use the auto-response templates below as a starting point.]
86
87### Internal Notes
88- [Any additional context for the agent picking this up]
89- [Reproduction hints if it's a bug]
90- [Escalation triggers to watch for]
91```
92
93### 6. Offer Next Steps
94
95After presenting the triage:
96- "Want me to draft a full response to the customer?"
97- "Should I search for more context on this issue?"
98- "Want me to check if this is a known bug in the tracker?"
99- "Should I escalate this? I can package it with /customer-escalation."
100
101---
102
103## Category Taxonomy
104
105Assign every ticket a **primary category** and optionally a **secondary category**:
106
107| Category | Description | Signal Words |
108|----------|-------------|-------------|
109| **Bug** | Product is behaving incorrectly or unexpectedly | Error, broken, crash, not working, unexpected, wrong, failing |
110| **How-to** | Customer needs guidance on using the product | How do I, can I, where is, setting up, configure, help with |
111| **Feature request** | Customer wants a capability that doesn't exist | Would be great if, wish I could, any plans to, requesting |
112| **Billing** | Payment, subscription, invoice, or pricing issues | Charge, invoice, payment, subscription, refund, upgrade, downgrade |
113| **Account** | Account access, permissions, settings, or user management | Login, password, access, permission, SSO, locked out, can't sign in |
114| **Integration** | Issues connecting to third-party tools or APIs | API, webhook, integration, connect, OAuth, sync, third-party |
115| **Security** | Security concerns, data access, or compliance questions | Data breach, unauthorized, compliance, GDPR, SOC 2, vulnerability |
116| **Data** | Data quality, migration, import/export issues | Missing data, export, import, migration, incorrect data, duplicates |
117| **Performance** | Speed, reliability, or availability issues | Slow, timeout, latency, down, unavailable, degraded |
118
119### Category Determination Tips
120
121- If the customer reports **both** a bug and a feature request, the bug is primary
122- If they can't log in due to a bug, category is **Bug** (not Account) — root cause drives the category
123- "It used to work and now it doesn't" = **Bug**
124- "I want it to work differently" = **Feature request**
125- "How do I make it work?" = **How-to**
126- When in doubt, lean toward **Bug** — it's better to investigate than dismiss
127
128## Priority Framework
129
130### P1 — Critical
131**Criteria:** Production system down, data loss or corruption, security breach, all or most users affected.
132
133- The customer cannot use the product at all
134- Data is being lost, corrupted, or exposed
135- A security incident is in progress
136- The issue is worsening or expanding in scope
137
138**SLA expectation:** Respond within 1 hour. Continuous work until resolved or mitigated. Updates every 1-2 hours.
139
140### P2 — High
141**Criteria:** Major feature broken, significant workflow blocked, many users affected, no workaround.
142
143- A core workflow is broken but the product is partially usable
144- Multiple users are affected or a key account is impacted
145- The issue is blocking time-sensitive work
146- No reasonable workaround exists
147
148**SLA expectation:** Respond within 4 hours. Active investigation same day. Updates every 4 hours.
149
150### P3 — Medium
151**Criteria:** Feature partially broken, workaround available, single user or small team affected.
152
153- A feature isn't working correctly but a workaround exists
154- The issue is inconvenient but not blocking critical work
155- A single user or small team is affected
156- The customer is not escalating urgently
157
158**SLA expectation:** Respond within 1 business day. Resolution or update within 3 business days.
159
160### P4 — Low
161**Criteria:** Minor inconvenience, cosmetic issue, general question, feature request.
162
163- Cosmetic or UI issues that don't affect functionality
164- Feature requests and enhancement ideas
165- General questions or how-to inquiries
166- Issues with simple, documented solutions
167
168**SLA expectation:** Respond within 2 business days. Resolution at normal pace.
169
170### Priority Escalation Triggers
171
172Automatically bump priority up when:
173- Customer has been waiting longer than the SLA allows
174- Multiple customers report the same issue (pattern detected)
175- The customer explicitly escalates or mentions executive involvement
176- A workaround that was in place stops working
177- The issue expands in scope (more users, more data, new symptoms)
178
179## Routing Rules
180
181Route tickets based on category and complexity:
182
183| Route to | When |
184|----------|------|
185| **Tier 1 (frontline support)** | How-to questions, known issues with documented solutions, billing inquiries, password resets |
186| **Tier 2 (senior support)** | Bugs requiring investigation, complex configuration, integration troubleshooting, account issues |
187| **Engineering** | Confirmed bugs needing code fixes, infrastructure issues, performance degradation |
188| **Product** | Feature requests with significant demand, design decisions, workflow gaps |
189| **Security** | Data access concerns, vulnerability reports, compliance questions |
190| **Billing/Finance** | Refund requests, contract disputes, complex billing adjustments |
191
192## Duplicate Detection
193
194Before creating a new ticket or routing, check for duplicates:
195
1961. **Search by symptom**: Look for tickets with similar error messages or descriptions
1972. **Search by customer**: Check if this customer has an open ticket for the same issue
1983. **Search by product area**: Look for recent tickets in the same feature area
1994. **Check known issues**: Compare against documented known issues
200
201**If a duplicate is found:**
202- Link the new ticket to the existing one
203- Notify the customer that this is a known issue being tracked
204- Add any new information from the new report to the existing ticket
205- Bump priority if the new report adds urgency (more customers affected, etc.)
206
207## Auto-Response Templates by Category
208
209### Bug — Initial Response
210```
211Thank you for reporting this. I can see how [specific impact]
212would be disruptive for your work.
213
214I've logged this as a [priority] issue and our team is
215investigating. [If workaround exists: "In the meantime, you
216can [workaround]."]
217
218I'll update you within [SLA timeframe] with what we find.
219```
220
221### How-to — Initial Response
222```
223Great question! [Direct answer or link to documentation]
224
225[If more complex: "Let me walk you through the steps:"]
226[Steps or guidance]
227
228Let me know if that helps, or if you have any follow-up
229questions.
230```
231
232### Feature Request — Initial Response
233```
234Thank you for this suggestion — I can see why [capability]
235would be valuable for your workflow.
236
237I've documented this and shared it with our product team.
238While I can't commit to a specific timeline, your feedback
239directly informs our roadmap priorities.
240
241[If alternative exists: "In the meantime, you might find
242[alternative] helpful for achieving something similar."]
243```
244
245### Billing — Initial Response
246```
247I understand billing issues need prompt attention. Let me
248look into this for you.
249
250[If straightforward: resolution details]
251[If complex: "I'm reviewing your account now and will have
252an answer for you within [timeframe]."]
253```
254
255### Security — Initial Response
256```
257Thank you for flagging this — we take security concerns
258seriously and are reviewing this immediately.
259
260I've escalated this to our security team for investigation.
261We'll follow up with you within [timeframe] with our findings.
262
263[If action is needed: "In the meantime, we recommend
264[protective action]."]
265```
266
267## Triage Best Practices
268
2691. Read the full ticket before categorizing — context in later messages often changes the assessment
2702. Categorize by **root cause**, not just the symptom described
2713. When in doubt on priority, err on the side of higher — it's easier to de-escalate than to recover from a missed SLA
2724. Always check for duplicates and known issues before routing
2735. Write internal notes that help the next person pick up context quickly
2746. Include what you've already checked or ruled out to avoid duplicate investigation
2757. Flag patterns — if you're seeing the same issue repeatedly, escalate the pattern even if individual tickets are low priority