How do I install the To Prd skill?

Run npx skillmds@latest add antigravity/to-prd in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.

Is To Prd safe to use?

SkillMD's automated safety review verdict for this skill is PASS. Independent scanners report: SkillSpector: PASS, Skill Scanner: PASS. Capability flags: makes network calls. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.

Which AI agents work with To Prd?

This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Cursor, OpenAI Codex, Gemini, Antigravity. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.

Is To Prd free to use?

Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free. This skill is licensed under MIT.

Who published To Prd?

Antigravity Skills (@antigravity) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.

To Prd by antigravity — Agent Skill

Name: To Prd
Rating: 4.2 (5 reviews)
Author: Antigravity Skills

File contents

When to Use

Use when this workflow matches the user request: Turn the current conversation into a PRD and publish it to the project issue tracker — no interview, just synthesis of what you've already discussed.

_Source: mattpocock/skills (MIT)._This skill takes the current conversation context and codebase understanding and produces a PRD. Do NOT interview the user — just synthesize what you already know.

The issue tracker and triage label vocabulary should have been provided to you — run /setup-matt-pocock-skills if not.

Process

Explore the repo to understand the current state of the codebase, if you haven't already. Use the project's domain glossary vocabulary throughout the PRD, and respect any ADRs in the area you're touching.
Sketch out the seams at which you're going to test the feature. Existing seams should be preferred to new ones. Use the highest seam possible. If new seams are needed, propose them at the highest point you can. The fewer seams across the codebase, the better - the ideal number is one.

Check with the user that these seams match their expectations.

Write the PRD using the template below, then publish it to the project issue tracker. Apply the ready-for-agent triage label - no need for additional triage.

Problem Statement

The problem that the user is facing, from the user's perspective.

Solution

The solution to the problem, from the user's perspective.

User Stories

A LONG, numbered list of user stories. Each user story should be in the format of:

As an , I want a , so that

This list of user stories should be extremely extensive and cover all aspects of the feature.

Implementation Decisions

A list of implementation decisions that were made. This can include:

The modules that will be built/modified
The interfaces of those modules that will be modified
Technical clarifications from the developer
Architectural decisions
Schema changes
API contracts
Specific interactions

Do NOT include specific file paths or code snippets. They may end up being outdated very quickly.

Exception: if a prototype produced a snippet that encodes a decision more precisely than prose can (state machine, reducer, schema, type shape), inline it within the relevant decision and note briefly that it came from a prototype. Trim to the decision-rich parts — not a working demo, just the important bits.

Testing Decisions

A list of testing decisions that were made. Include:

A description of what makes a good test (only test external behavior, not implementation details)
Which modules will be tested
Prior art for the tests (i.e. similar types of tests in the codebase)

Out of Scope

A description of the things that are out of scope for this PRD.

Further Notes

Any further notes about the feature.

Limitations

Requires the upstream tool, account, API key, or local setup when the workflow names one.
Does not authorize destructive, production, paid, or external-message actions without explicit user approval.
Validate generated artifacts or recommendations against the user's real sources before treating them as final.

---name: to-prddescription: Synthesize the current conversation and codebase context into a Product Requirements Document and publish it to the project's issue tracker.license: MIT---## When to UseUse when this workflow matches the user request: Turn the current conversation into a PRD and publish it to the project issue tracker — no interview, just synthesis of what you've already discussed._Source: [mattpocock/skills](https://github.com/mattpocock/skills) (MIT)._This skill takes the current conversation context and codebase understanding and produces a PRD. Do NOT interview the user — just synthesize what you already know.The issue tracker and triage label vocabulary should have been provided to you — run `/setup-matt-pocock-skills` if not.## Process1. Explore the repo to understand the current state of the codebase, if you haven't already. Use the project's domain glossary vocabulary throughout the PRD, and respect any ADRs in the area you're touching.2. Sketch out the seams at which you're going to test the feature. Existing seams should be preferred to new ones. Use the highest seam possible. If new seams are needed, propose them at the highest point you can. The fewer seams across the codebase, the better - the ideal number is one.Check with the user that these seams match their expectations.3. Write the PRD using the template below, then publish it to the project issue tracker. Apply the `ready-for-agent` triage label - no need for additional triage.<prd-template>## Problem StatementThe problem that the user is facing, from the user's perspective.## SolutionThe solution to the problem, from the user's perspective.## User StoriesA LONG, numbered list of user stories. Each user story should be in the format of:1. As an <actor>, I want a <feature>, so that <benefit><user-story-example>1. As a mobile bank customer, I want to see balance on my accounts, so that I can make better informed decisions about my spending</user-story-example>This list of user stories should be extremely extensive and cover all aspects of the feature.## Implementation DecisionsA list of implementation decisions that were made. This can include:- The modules that will be built/modified- The interfaces of those modules that will be modified- Technical clarifications from the developer- Architectural decisions- Schema changes- API contracts- Specific interactionsDo NOT include specific file paths or code snippets. They may end up being outdated very quickly.Exception: if a prototype produced a snippet that encodes a decision more precisely than prose can (state machine, reducer, schema, type shape), inline it within the relevant decision and note briefly that it came from a prototype. Trim to the decision-rich parts — not a working demo, just the important bits.## Testing DecisionsA list of testing decisions that were made. Include:- A description of what makes a good test (only test external behavior, not implementation details)- Which modules will be tested- Prior art for the tests (i.e. similar types of tests in the codebase)## Out of ScopeA description of the things that are out of scope for this PRD.## Further NotesAny further notes about the feature.</prd-template>## Limitations- Requires the upstream tool, account, API key, or local setup when the workflow names one.- Does not authorize destructive, production, paid, or external-message actions without explicit user approval.- Validate generated artifacts or recommendations against the user's real sources before treating them as final.

Frequently asked questions

To Prd