Sw Increment

sw-increment — plan the unit of work

An increment is one folder, .specweave/increments/NNNN-slug/, and it is the tracker: spec + tasks + ledger + evidence live together and travel in git. Write the spec, get it approved, then implement (sw-do). No code before the ACs exist.

Run specweave --version: exit 0 → CLI path. Not found → manual path.

1. Understand before writing

Ask only what you cannot infer from the repo — typically: the problem behind the request, what is explicitly out of scope, and how you will know it works. Scope clear from the request? Skip the interview and write the spec.

2. Create the folder

CLI:

specweave create-increment --auto-id --name "<slug>" --title "<Title>" \
  --description "<one line>" --project "<project id from .specweave/config.json>" \
  [--type feature|bug|hotfix|refactor|experiment]

Manual: next id = highest existing number + 1, zero-padded to 4 (ls .specweave/increments), folder NNNN-kebab-slug, then write metadata.json, spec.md, tasks.md, and an empty ledger.jsonl:

{"id":"0042-ledger-fold","status":"active","type":"feature","created":"2026-09-02T10:00:00Z","lastActivity":"2026-09-02T10:00:00Z"}

Write every file as UTF-8 without a BOM (PowerShell: [IO.File]::WriteAllText($p, $body, [Text.UTF8Encoding]::new($false)), never >) — a BOM breaks the parsers that read these files on the next machine.

Status is one of planning active paused ready_for_review completed abandoned, and only lifecycle commands change it. Replacing an older increment? Add "supersedes":"0031-old-slug" here and close that one as abandoned with the reason superseded by 0042-ledger-fold.

3. spec.md — one evolving document

# 0042 Ledger fold

## Problem
What is wrong today and for whom. The intent, not the solution.

## Scope
In: … · Out: … (say what you are deliberately not doing)

## Acceptance criteria
- [ ] AC-01 Two agents claiming the same task never both get it
- [ ] AC-02 A malformed ledger line is skipped and counted, never fatal

## Approach
Files that change and in what order · risks · decisions taken (link ADRs) ·
alternatives rejected and why.

## Open questions
- …

ACs are numbered, checkable, and each one is testable by a command or an observation. plan.md is optional overflow when the Approach outgrows the spec.

4. tasks.md — definitions only

# Tasks — 0042 Ledger fold

### T-01 Fold the ledger
- AC: AC-01 | Files: src/core/tasks/ledger.ts, src/core/tasks/ledger.test.ts | Test: npm test -- ledger

### T-02 Skip malformed lines
- AC: AC-02 | Files: src/core/tasks/ledger.ts | Test: npm test -- ledger

• Every AC is covered by at least one task; every task names its Files: (the ownership unit for parallel agents) and a Test: command that proves it.
• Split tasks so two agents never need the same file. Task state is NOT written here — the ledger owns it (sw-task).

5. Approve, then hand off

Show the ACs and the task list, get an explicit go-ahead, then run sw-do. Set metadata.json.status to active when work starts.

Rules

• No code, no scaffolding, no dependencies before the spec is approved.
• One increment = one shippable outcome. Two outcomes = two increments.
• ACs are the definition of done; specweave verify counts them and specweave complete refuses to close without passing evidence.

Related

• sw-do — implement it. · sw-task — the ledger. · sw-review — adversarial pass before closing.