spec-to-issue — Spec to GitHub Issue
Auto-generate GitHub Issues from spec directories (.specs/{feature}/).
Language Rules
- Auto-detect input language → output in the same language
- Japanese input → Japanese issue, use
references/issue-template.ja.mdas template reference - English input → English issue, use
references/issue-template.mdas template reference - Explicit override takes priority
Reference file selection: Based on the detected output language, use the corresponding template:
- English →
references/issue-template.md - Japanese →
references/issue-template.ja.md
Execution Flow
1. Locate Spec Directory
With argument: spec-to-issue auth-feature → use .specs/auth-feature/
Without argument: Scan .specs/ and present a list → ask user to select
Spec directories found in .specs/:
1. auth-feature (requirement.md, design.md, tasks.md)
2. member-management (requirement.md, tasks.md)
Which spec do you want to create an issue from?
2. File Validation
Required: requirement.md must exist. Otherwise, exit with error.
Recommended: design.md and tasks.md.
If either is missing, continue only when the remaining documents still define
concrete scope and acceptance criteria; report the missing source before issue
creation.
3. Spec Analysis
Treat the spec files as candidate sources, not as sections to copy. Extract and select:
requirement.md:
- Title: First
#line, strip suffixes like "Requirements", "要件定義書" - The problem and observable completed state
- Current and expected behavior
- Included and excluded scope
- Requirement-level acceptance criteria
design.md:
- Decisions constrained by compatibility, security, external contracts, or another requirement, including the reason
- Open questions that the implementer cannot safely decide alone
tasks.md:
- Supporting implementation detail and additional completion evidence
- Do not copy phase headings, task headings, estimates, or technology lists by default
Keep a candidate only when removing it would change an implementation decision or completion judgment. See the selected language's issue-template reference for the complete selection procedure.
4. Resolve Project Settings
Determine defaults in this priority order:
Command arguments > .specs/.config.yml > CLAUDE.md > Built-in defaults
From CLAUDE.md:
- Branch name: PR target branch from Git Workflow section →
--branchdefault - GitHub Organization: Inferred from repository URL
.specs/.config.yml (optional):
default-branch: develop
default-labels: [feature, spec-generated]
project-number: 7
assignee: username
5. Resolve the Project Template and Compose the Issue Body
Inspect the repository's Issue forms, Issue templates, contribution rules, and required fields before composing the body. A project template takes priority: preserve its headings, order, fields, and checkboxes, and map the selected information into it.
See template details in the appropriate reference file (based on Language Rules):
- English: references/issue-template.md
- Japanese: references/issue-template.ja.md
Without a project template, compose an execution contract that identifies the problem, completed state, current and expected behavior, included and excluded scope, acceptance criteria, binding decisions, and open questions. Link to the spec files for task decomposition and supporting detail.
6. Create Issue
Without --preview (default): Show a brief summary and execute gh issue create
Creating Issue:
Title: [Feature] Member Management
Labels: feature, spec-generated
Outcome: Members can be invited and assigned a repository role
Acceptance criteria: 4
→ Running gh issue create...
Issue #42 created: https://github.com/org/repo/issues/42
With --preview: Display the full issue body, confirm, then execute
7. Additional Actions (optional)
--label: Apply specified labels--project: Add to GitHub Project board viagh project item-add--assignee: Set assignee
Options
| Option | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|
--preview |
Display issue body for confirmation | OFF |
--label <labels> |
Comma-separated labels | .config.yml value or none |
--project <number> |
Add to GitHub Project | .config.yml value or none |
--branch <name> |
Base branch for spec links | CLAUDE.md or main |
--assignee <user> |
Set assignee | .config.yml value or none |
Integration with spec-generator
After spec-generator's full phase completes, suggest:
All three spec documents have been generated.
→ Create a GitHub Issue from them? (Y/n)
If yes, run spec-to-issue on the same directory.
Error Handling
| Situation | Response |
|---|---|
.specs/ does not exist |
Error: Spec directory not found |
requirement.md missing |
Error: requirement.md is required |
design.md or tasks.md missing |
Continue only if concrete scope and acceptance criteria remain; otherwise stop and report the missing source |
gh CLI not authenticated |
Error: Guide user to gh auth login |
| Concrete acceptance criteria missing | Stop before issue creation; do not invent generic completion checks |
| Project template found | Preserve its required headings and fields instead of appending the built-in template |
Usage Examples
# With argument
/spec-to-issue auth-feature
# Auto-detect and select
/spec-to-issue
# With preview
/spec-to-issue auth-feature --preview
# With labels and Project
/spec-to-issue auth-feature --label "feature,priority:high" --project 7
# After spec-generator
"Create full spec for todo-app" → done → "Turn this into an issue"
# Japanese
「仕様書を全部作って」→ 完了 →「これをIssueにして」