Aosp Book Polish

AOSP Book Polish

Bring the AOSP Internals book into sync with a newer AOSP source tree: deep-rewrite existing chapters for accuracy, append new-feature content where a subsystem changed, and — always — find newly-added modules/projects and make sure the book covers them (fold into an existing chapter first; add a new chapter/Part only when a threshold is met).

This is a large, multi-/goal-run, agent-team job. It is built to be resumable and convergent: each chapter is rewritten then reviewed until two consecutive clean rounds, and durable state lets a fresh run pick up where the last stopped.

When to use

• The local AOSP checkout (its path supplied to you as a parameter, usually androidNN-release) was synced to a newer version and the book should reflect it.
• The user asks to update/polish the book, deep-rewrite chapters, or specifically to cover newly-added modules (the mandatory Phase C below).
• Pairs with the aosp-version-diff skill: that skill produces the 16→17 style changeset (manifest-snapshots/_compare/<A>-to-<B>/) this skill consumes.

If there is no changeset yet, run aosp-version-diff first (or tools/manifest_snapshot.py compare) — the changeset drives prioritization and the new-module gap analysis.

Inputs

• AOSP source — the AOSP checkout root, supplied as a parameter (e.g. in the task prompt); READ-ONLY. Never write into it, and never hardcode its path.
• Changeset — manifest-snapshots/_compare/<old>-to-<new>/: report.md (navigator + per-repo new/dropped counts), changes.txt (per-repo NEW commits — large, grep per repo, never read whole), added-removed.txt (added / removed projects — the seed for Phase C).
• Book conventions — book/CLAUDE.md (the writing rules; these are non-negotiable), .claude/skills/book-writer/SKILL.md (chapter structure + Mermaid syntax), agents/_content/manifest.toml (Part → chapter mapping), existing chapters as style exemplars.
• The Android-NN appendix (e.g. D-appendix-android-17-updates.md) — a curated map of the new version's changes; a per-chapter checklist of what to fold in, and the candidate universe for the Phase C gap analysis.

The five hard invariants (never violate)

These protect book integrity during autonomous rewrites. Full detail in references/invariants.md — read it before editing any chapter.

1. Chapter title is immutable; the number may be renumbered, but only as a coordinated whole-book operation. The # Chapter N: Title title text and the slug never change. The number N (and the filename's NN- prefix) may change to insert a new chapter at its logical position — but NEVER as an ad-hoc single-chapter edit. A renumber is all-or-nothing: rename the files, update each moved chapter's heading AND every internal section number (## N.x → ## M.x), and fix every cross-reference book-wide, in one pass (see references/bookkeeping.md → "Renumbering"). Default to appending new chapters; renumber only when the user asks for logical ordering.
2. Manual section numbering (## N.1, ### N.1.2) is preserved, monotonic, no duplicates. Terminal structure stays "Try It" then "Summary" (an optional key-files table may follow Summary). No epigraph under the title.
3. Mermaid follows CLAUDE.md rules and must pass ./serve.sh png <chapter> with errors=0 — CI does NOT validate Mermaid, so this gate is the only backstop. Also eyeball each diagram for overflow/overlap and architectural correctness.
4. Real source citations — every architectural claim cites a repo-relative AOSP path that exists in the new tree. Never put a local absolute or home-relative path (/home/..., /Users/..., ~/...) or a username in chapter text — repo-relative AOSP paths only.
5. Per-chapter backup before rewriting — copy to .superpowers/book-polish/backups/<slug>.bak.md (once; never overwrite) so a bad rewrite is diffable/restorable.

Workflow

Phase A  Prioritize        (once) rank chapters by changeset signal -> queue.json
Phase B  Per-chapter loop  deep-rewrite + agent-team review to convergence
Phase C  New modules       (MANDATORY) gap analysis -> fold first, new chapter by threshold
Phase D  Bookkeeping+gates  regenerate skills, build, leak-sweep; user commits

Run Phase B over the queue and Phase C for the leftovers; they share the same per-chapter convergent loop and the same gates. Checkpoint durable state after every step so a fresh /goal run resumes.

Phase A — Prioritize (once)

Map each in-scope subsystem to its chapter(s) via manifest.toml, rank chapters by 16→17-style signal (sum of NEW commits across the chapter's repos + count of new modules touching it), and write queue.json (highest-priority first). The most valuable chapters then land first even if a run stops early. Initialize state.json with every chapter pending. See references/per-chapter-loop.md.

Phase B — Per-chapter convergent polish

For each chapter, in priority waves (≤ the agent cap): back it up, deep-rewrite the body for accuracy against the new source + append new-feature sections (before "Try It"), then run an independent agent-team review (accuracy + Mermaid + structure-lint), fix the material findings, and repeat until two consecutive clean rounds. One author agent per file (never two agents editing the same file at once). Full procedure, agent roles, and the gate batch script in references/per-chapter-loop.md.

Phase C — Newly-added modules/projects (MANDATORY)

This phase is required even when Phase B looks done — new modules are easy to miss because they have no existing chapter. Always run it. The full procedure is in references/new-modules.md. In brief:

1. Gap analysis (in a subagent) — three candidate sets, see references/new-modules.md:
   • (A) changeset-driven (version bump): the added projects (changeset added-removed.txt + the new-version appendix's enumerated new modules).
   • (B) whole-tree sweep (when asked to "read across the whole source and find what's left"): enumerate EVERY project from <aosp-root>/.repo/project.list and grep each path + last segment across [0-9][0-9]-*.md; keep in-scope platform roots, drop noise (external/, prebuilts/, vendor/, device/, test/toolchain). This catches subsystems that predate the diff baseline and were never written up — (A) by construction cannot.
   • (C) release-notes-driven (whenever official notes exist — always run on a version bump): WebFetch the developer Beta/release blog and the source.android.com/docs/whatsnew page, extract every called-out feature's exact API/flag/symbol, and grep each token across the chapter bodies. This is the ONLY method that finds new framework APIs / behavior changes / deprecations inside repos that merely moved (e.g. a new camera2 method, an SDK-37 relaunch-behavior change) — (A) and (B) are project-granular and structurally blind to them. Verify each is a real AOSP platform change (not a Play/first-party-app feature) and confirm the exact symbol in source; blog prose loosely names flags that don't exist verbatim. Whichever method, produce the uncovered list with, per item: real source path, what it is (verified from source), substance (LOC / substantial-vs-stub), and a recommended placement. Beware the grep's false positives (concept covered under another name; deprecated/sample/empty repos; generic-word matches) — verify coverage and substance, don't trust the grep.
2. Placement policy (threshold):
   • A new capability that extends an existing subsystem → fold a new numbered section into that chapter (preferred — do this first).
   • A substantial new top-level subsystem that does not fit any chapter → a new chapter (appended number, continuing past the last one).
   • A cluster of related new repos forming a new domain → a new Part appended after the last numbered Part, before Appendices.
   • external/* deps and thin/stub/relocation/prebuilt modules → a brief integration note in the most relevant chapter (or leave to the appendix). They never get their own chapter.
3. Author the sections/notes (with Mermaid where it clarifies) and run them through the same convergent review loop as Phase B.
4. New chapter/Part → do the new-chapter bookkeeping in Phase D.

Phase D — Bookkeeping & gates

After chapters reach convergence, and after any new chapter/Part. Full checklist in references/bookkeeping.md. Gates that must be green:

• python3 agents/build.py regenerated and agents/build.py --check exits 0 (content changes stale the Part-skills — rule 12).
• properdocs build succeeds in the project Docker image (a local properdocs fails on the !!python tag — that's environmental, not your error).
• Every touched chapter ./serve.sh png reports errors=0.
• No local-path/username leaks anywhere in the touched files.
• New chapter only: manifest.toml, properdocs.yml nav, the docs/ symlink, README.md + agents/README.md counts/tables, and llms.txt updated; a new Part also needs a hand-authored agents/_content/parts/<id>/SKILL.md before build.py will run.

Agent-team orchestration (≤10 by default)

Process the queue in waves. Per wave: spawn one author agent per chapter (distinct files only), then independent reviewer agents (accuracy + Mermaid

• structure), then targeted fixers. Fold the cheap accuracy self-check into the author (have it verify every cited path against source and run serve.sh png itself), then run a deterministic batch gate yourself and a separate adversarial review team. Retry any subagent that hits a transient API/network/tool error (≤3×) — these happen and a retry almost always works.

Resumable state — .superpowers/book-polish/ (gitignored)

state.json ({phase, sections:{<slug>:{status,round,dry_rounds,priority,part}}, new_parts, done_count, total}), queue.json, new-chapters.json, backups/<slug>.bak.md, findings/, log.md. On start, if state.json exists, resume from it; else initialize via Phase A. Steps are idempotent.

Commit policy

Do NOT auto-commit. Keep all changes local on the current branch; do not create a branch or push. The user reviews and commits. When the user does ask to commit: stage everything, confirm nothing under .superpowers/ or docs/ is staged, and use a plain commit (no Co-Authored-By trailer — CLAUDE.md rule).

Gotchas learned the hard way

• git checkout -- agents/ reverts your manifest + Part templates. manifest.toml and agents/_content/parts/*/SKILL.md live under agents/, so a blanket checkout to clear a subagent's stray build.py regen also wipes your bookkeeping. Revert only the generated platform trees, or re-apply + regenerate.
• A new Part needs its source template first. build.py fails with "Missing SKILL.md for part " until you hand-author agents/_content/parts/<id>/SKILL.md (copy an existing Part's as a model).
• The dup-section gate must use full tokens. A regex like ^#{2,3} N\.[0-9]+ mis-flags 4-level numbers (N.1.5.1 → "N.1.5"). Match the whole token: ^#{2,4} N\.[0-9]+(\.[0-9]+){0,3} then sort | uniq -d.
• properdocs build must run in Docker. Validate with docker compose run --rm --no-deps --entrypoint sh serve -c "properdocs build".
• Front matter (00) and intro (01) go last — they enumerate the book's structure, so update them after new chapters/Parts exist. They have no Try-It/Summary; do not add them.

References

• references/new-modules.md — the mandatory Phase C gap-analysis-and-add procedure
• references/per-chapter-loop.md — Phase A/B: prioritization, the convergent loop, agent roles, the batch gate
• references/invariants.md — the hard invariants + book conventions in full
• references/bookkeeping.md — Phase D: regeneration, new-chapter wiring, gates, commit