AR-Toqi Breakage scanner (monitor)
The product visibly breaking, on the flow where breaking costs the most —
written for this product, not a generic template. Create with
vision-scanners-create. You fill four blanks; the scaffold around them is
locked.
{
// AGENT FILLS `name`, per the core naming rule - "Broken checkout",
// "Booking failures".
"name": "<name>",
"scanner_type": "monitor",
"scanner_config": {
"prompt": "Watch this session for moments where the product visibly broke for the user: an error message or toast, a blank/white screen, content that failed to load, obviously broken layout, a spinner that never resolves, or a button/form/action that clearly did nothing or failed. In this product that especially means: {{WATCH_FOR}}. Only flag issues that are unambiguous on screen and would actually matter to the user – ignore cosmetic nits and anything you're unsure about. For each: what the user was trying to do, what broke, and the URL.\n\n{{PRODUCT_CONTEXT}}"
},
"query": {
// AGENT FILLS: this product's key completion flow + its immediate
// predecessors, read out of the repo.
"kind": "RecordingsQuery",
"properties": [
{ "key": "$current_url", "value": "/checkout", "operator": "icontains", "type": "event" }
]
},
"sampling_rate": 0.5,
"model": "gemini-3-flash-preview"
}
{{WATCH_FOR}} is what makes this scanner belong to this product: three
to six concrete failure modes read out of the repo, each observable on screen,
in the product's own vocabulary — "the slot picker showing no available
courts", "the payment step rejecting a valid card", "a booking confirmation
that never appears". Facts about what failure looks
like here, under the same content rules as {{PRODUCT_CONTEXT}}.
This monitor owns the where axis of the disjointness rule in
replay-vision-scanners-core — a URL-scoped query, never an event gate. In
particular never gate it on $exception: that blinds it to silent breakage,
the thing vision is uniquely good at.
Re-run match phrase: moments where the product visibly broke for the user.