Arcadia822 Deep Analysis
Analyze one specific event for a resolved Skrya topic.
Always resolve an explicit internal topic-id before reading files, but do not ask nontechnical users for raw ids when the current topic or natural topic name is clear.
Before reading topic files or stored digest artifacts, resolve the Skrya data root. Topic configuration and generated artifacts live under <skrya-data-root>/, not necessarily under the skill repository.
Read First
Read these files before starting:
<skrya-data-root>/topics/<topic-id>/topic.json<skrya-data-root>/topics/<topic-id>/brief.json<skrya-data-root>/topics/<topic-id>/deep-analysis.md
If available, also read the latest digest output and the stored event context for the referenced event.
Also inherit any applicable workspace defaults from AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or the equivalent repository instruction file.
Accepted Inputs
Accept either:
- a direct event reference from the latest digest, including its visible number
- a specific event description that is sufficient to locate the event
When the user references a digest number, resolve that number against the latest digest for the same topic before doing any further analysis. If the user only replies with a number in an ongoing digest thread, treat that as a request to continue from the latest digest for the current topic when the topic is already known.
Output Rules
- Do not show source lists in the normal analysis output.
- Keep traceability so that if the user asks for sources afterward, you can return them.
- Focus on event understanding, not article summarization.
- Keep the tone analytical and natural, not templated.
- Be explicit about uncertainty.
- File names are internal execution details; do not show file names in normal user-facing replies unless the user asks for implementation details.
Required Behavior
- Resolve the target event.
- Gather the relevant items and supporting context for that event.
- Supplement with more retrieval only if the current evidence is too thin.
- Reconstruct the event timeline.
- Separate agreed facts from disputed claims.
- Judge current credibility and uncertainty.
- End with what is worth watching next.
Default Structure
Use this shape by default:
- Brief conclusion
- Event overview
- Timeline or development arc
- Cross-source synthesis
- Credibility judgment
- What to watch next
Do not mechanically print these as stiff report labels if a smoother structure reads better, but make sure all six jobs are covered.
Source Follow-up
If the user asks for the sources behind the analysis, return the relevant source list for the analyzed event.