Sandwich Panel Design (structures/composites/sandwich-panels)
Use when the task is sandwich panel design or analysis for aerospace
structures: face sheet stress, core shear, face wrinkling, equivalent
bending stiffness, deflection, and honeycomb versus foam core
selection.
Domain quick reference
- A sandwich panel is two thin, stiff face sheets bonded to a
lightweight core. The faces carry the bending moment as a
tension-compression couple; the core carries the transverse shear;
the large face separation gives high bending stiffness per unit
weight.
- Face centroid distance d = c + t, overall thickness h = c + 2t,
where t is one face thickness and c is the core thickness. The
couple arm is d, not h.
- Equivalent bending stiffness per unit width,
D = Eftd^2/(2*(1-nu^2)) + Eft^3/(6(1-nu^2)); the first term
(face couple) dominates when t is small relative to d.
- Face stress from a bending moment M per unit width: sigma = M/(d*t),
compression on the loaded face, tension on the opposite face.
- Core shear stress from a shear load V per unit width:
tau = V/(b*d). The core carries essentially all transverse shear;
a shear margin of tau_allow/|tau| >= 1 is required.
- Face wrinkling is local buckling of a face sheet into the core:
sigma_wr = 0.5*(EfEcGc)^(1/3). Honeycomb cores resist wrinkling
better than soft foams; foam is more impact tolerant and forms to
curved tooling.
- Sandwich beam deflection adds a core shear term to the bending
term: delta = 5qL^4/(384D) + qL^2/(8Gcd) for a simply
supported beam under a uniform load q per unit width. The shear
term is significant for soft cores and short spans.
- Core selection: honeycomb wins on specific shear stiffness
(Gc/rho, typically 3-10x foam); foam wins on impact tolerance,
moisture immunity, and cost on contoured parts.
Workflow
- Collect the configuration: face modulus Ef and poisson ratio nu,
face thickness t, core thickness c, core modulus Ec, core shear
modulus Gc, and the loads (moment M, shear V, or distributed load
q over span L).
- Compute the couple arm d = c + t and the equivalent bending
stiffness D with bending_stiffness.
- Compute the face stresses from the moment with face_stress and
check them against the face allowable with face_stress_margin.
- Compute the core shear stress from the shear load with
core_shear_stress and check the core with core_shear_margin.
- Check face wrinkling with wrinkling_stress against the face
allowable (wrinkling is often the limiting face failure mode).
- Compute the bending and shear deflection terms with
sandwich_beam_deflection; check the total against the deflection
requirement.
- Select the core type with select_core: weight-critical flat
panels favor honeycomb, impact- or moisture-critical or contoured
parts favor foam.
Pitfalls
- Using the overall thickness h instead of the couple arm d in the
stress and stiffness formulas; the error is large when t is not
negligible relative to c.
- Ignoring the core shear deflection term for short spans or foam
cores; it can exceed the bending deflection.
- Checking only face stress and missing face wrinkling, which is
driven by the core moduli, not the face strength.
- Applying a face allowable to the core shear stress or vice versa;
the two failure modes use different allowables.
- Treating honeycomb as universally better: moisture intrusion and
curved tooling favor foam.
- Reading the wrinkling exponent as 1/2 instead of 1/3.
Behavior contract (gate 3)
The bending stiffness, face stress, core shear, wrinkling, deflection,
margin, and core selection logic is exercised by the gate 3 contract
test: scripts/test_sandwich_panels.py against
scripts/sandwich_panels_logic.py (stdlib unittest, offline). Run:
python3 scripts/test_sandwich_panels.py
Compliance
- FAR-25 (14 CFR Part 25, US government work, public domain) and
CS-25 (EASA, free download) frame the transport aeroplane
structural certification context; both are referenced only,
summary-not-copy per standards-map.yaml. The formulas here are
generic sandwich mechanics, not text from either standard.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.
1---2name: sandwich-panels3description: Use when the task is sandwich panel sizing or analysis, honeycomb or foam core selection, face sheet stress or core shear failure checks, face wrinkling, or sandwich bending stiffness and deflection. Design and analyze aerospace sandwich panels: compute the equivalent bending stiffness from the face modulus, face thickness, and core thickness, the face sheet stresses from a bending moment, the core shear stress from a shear load, the face wrinkling stress from the face and core moduli, and the total deflection of a sandwich beam or panel including the core shear contribution. Trigger: sandwich panel, honeycomb core, foam core, face wrinkling, core shear, face stress, sandwich deflection.4license: Apache-2.05---67# Sandwich Panel Design (structures/composites/sandwich-panels)89Use when the task is sandwich panel design or analysis for aerospace10structures: face sheet stress, core shear, face wrinkling, equivalent11bending stiffness, deflection, and honeycomb versus foam core12selection.1314## Domain quick reference1516- A sandwich panel is two thin, stiff face sheets bonded to a17 lightweight core. The faces carry the bending moment as a18 tension-compression couple; the core carries the transverse shear;19 the large face separation gives high bending stiffness per unit20 weight.21- Face centroid distance d = c + t, overall thickness h = c + 2t,22 where t is one face thickness and c is the core thickness. The23 couple arm is d, not h.24- Equivalent bending stiffness per unit width,25 D = Ef*t*d^2/(2*(1-nu^2)) + Ef*t^3/(6*(1-nu^2)); the first term26 (face couple) dominates when t is small relative to d.27- Face stress from a bending moment M per unit width: sigma = M/(d*t),28 compression on the loaded face, tension on the opposite face.29- Core shear stress from a shear load V per unit width:30 tau = V/(b*d). The core carries essentially all transverse shear;31 a shear margin of tau_allow/|tau| >= 1 is required.32- Face wrinkling is local buckling of a face sheet into the core:33 sigma_wr = 0.5*(Ef*Ec*Gc)^(1/3). Honeycomb cores resist wrinkling34 better than soft foams; foam is more impact tolerant and forms to35 curved tooling.36- Sandwich beam deflection adds a core shear term to the bending37 term: delta = 5*q*L^4/(384*D) + q*L^2/(8*Gc*d) for a simply38 supported beam under a uniform load q per unit width. The shear39 term is significant for soft cores and short spans.40- Core selection: honeycomb wins on specific shear stiffness41 (Gc/rho, typically 3-10x foam); foam wins on impact tolerance,42 moisture immunity, and cost on contoured parts.4344## Workflow45461. Collect the configuration: face modulus Ef and poisson ratio nu,47 face thickness t, core thickness c, core modulus Ec, core shear48 modulus Gc, and the loads (moment M, shear V, or distributed load49 q over span L).502. Compute the couple arm d = c + t and the equivalent bending51 stiffness D with bending_stiffness.523. Compute the face stresses from the moment with face_stress and53 check them against the face allowable with face_stress_margin.544. Compute the core shear stress from the shear load with55 core_shear_stress and check the core with core_shear_margin.565. Check face wrinkling with wrinkling_stress against the face57 allowable (wrinkling is often the limiting face failure mode).586. Compute the bending and shear deflection terms with59 sandwich_beam_deflection; check the total against the deflection60 requirement.617. Select the core type with select_core: weight-critical flat62 panels favor honeycomb, impact- or moisture-critical or contoured63 parts favor foam.6465## Pitfalls6667- Using the overall thickness h instead of the couple arm d in the68 stress and stiffness formulas; the error is large when t is not69 negligible relative to c.70- Ignoring the core shear deflection term for short spans or foam71 cores; it can exceed the bending deflection.72- Checking only face stress and missing face wrinkling, which is73 driven by the core moduli, not the face strength.74- Applying a face allowable to the core shear stress or vice versa;75 the two failure modes use different allowables.76- Treating honeycomb as universally better: moisture intrusion and77 curved tooling favor foam.78- Reading the wrinkling exponent as 1/2 instead of 1/3.7980## Behavior contract (gate 3)8182The bending stiffness, face stress, core shear, wrinkling, deflection,83margin, and core selection logic is exercised by the gate 3 contract84test: scripts/test_sandwich_panels.py against85scripts/sandwich_panels_logic.py (stdlib unittest, offline). Run:86python3 scripts/test_sandwich_panels.py8788## Compliance8990- FAR-25 (14 CFR Part 25, US government work, public domain) and91 CS-25 (EASA, free download) frame the transport aeroplane92 structural certification context; both are referenced only,93 summary-not-copy per standards-map.yaml. The formulas here are94 generic sandwich mechanics, not text from either standard.95- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.