How do I install the Technology Partnership skill?

Run npx skillmds@latest add ashutoshsrivastava17/technology-partnership in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.

Is Technology Partnership safe to use?

This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.

Which AI agents work with Technology Partnership?

This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.

Is Technology Partnership free to use?

Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free, and the skill stays under its author's original license.

Who published Technology Partnership?

ashutoshsrivastava17 (@ashutoshsrivastava17) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.

Technology Partnership by ashutoshsrivastava17

Name: Technology Partnership
Author: ashutoshsrivastava17

Technology Partnership

Evaluate technology partnerships — technical compatibility, integration depth, roadmap alignment, support models, and co-development frameworks. TRIGGER when: user says /technology-partnership, needs to evaluate a tech partner, or asks about technology integration partnerships.

File contents

Technology Partnership Evaluation

Process

Step 1: Define Partnership Objectives

Objective	Metric
Integration value	Customer adoption rate
Market access	Joint pipeline generated
Technical capability	Features enabled
Competitive position	Market differentiation

Step 2: Assess Technical Compatibility

Dimension	Assessment
API compatibility	REST/GraphQL/gRPC, auth methods
Data formats	Schema compatibility, transformation needs
Architecture	Cloud/on-prem alignment
Security	Compliance overlap, data handling
Performance	Latency, throughput requirements

Step 3: Evaluate Integration Depth

Level	Description	Investment
L1: Referral	Marketing partnership only	Low
L2: API link	Basic data exchange	Medium
L3: Deep integration	Embedded experience	High
L4: Platform	Built on/into each other	Very High

Step 4: Assess Roadmap Alignment

Dimension	Partner A	Our Product	Alignment
Target market	[market]	[market]	✅/⚠️/❌
Tech direction	[direction]	[direction]	✅/⚠️/❌
Release cadence	[cadence]	[cadence]	✅/⚠️/❌

Step 5: Define Support Model

Element	Details
Integration support	Dedicated partner engineer or documentation
Escalation path	Joint escalation process
Maintenance	Who owns the integration long-term
SLA	Uptime and response commitments

Output Format

## Partnership Eval: [Partner]
### Objectives: [Goals and metrics]
### Technical Fit: [Compatibility assessment]
### Integration Level: [Recommended depth]
### Risks: [Key concerns]
### Recommendation: [Proceed/Explore/Pass]

Quality Checklist

Technical compatibility validated with POC
Business objectives clearly defined
Roadmap alignment assessed
Support model agreed upon
Exit strategy considered

Edge Cases

For competitors-turned-partners, establish clear boundaries
If partner is much larger/smaller, plan for resource asymmetry
For open-source partnerships, clarify contribution and licensing

---name: technology-partnershipdescription: Evaluate technology partnerships — technical compatibility, integration depth, roadmap alignment, support models, and co-development frameworks. TRIGGER when: user says /technology-partnership, needs to evaluate a tech partner, or asks about technology integration partnerships.---# Technology Partnership Evaluation## Process### Step 1: Define Partnership Objectives| Objective | Metric ||-----------|--------|| Integration value | Customer adoption rate || Market access | Joint pipeline generated || Technical capability | Features enabled || Competitive position | Market differentiation |### Step 2: Assess Technical Compatibility| Dimension | Assessment ||-----------|-----------|| API compatibility | REST/GraphQL/gRPC, auth methods || Data formats | Schema compatibility, transformation needs || Architecture | Cloud/on-prem alignment || Security | Compliance overlap, data handling || Performance | Latency, throughput requirements |### Step 3: Evaluate Integration Depth| Level | Description | Investment ||-------|-----------|-----------|| L1: Referral | Marketing partnership only | Low || L2: API link | Basic data exchange | Medium || L3: Deep integration | Embedded experience | High || L4: Platform | Built on/into each other | Very High |### Step 4: Assess Roadmap Alignment| Dimension | Partner A | Our Product | Alignment ||-----------|----------|------------|-----------|| Target market | [market] | [market] | ✅/⚠️/❌ || Tech direction | [direction] | [direction] | ✅/⚠️/❌ || Release cadence | [cadence] | [cadence] | ✅/⚠️/❌ |### Step 5: Define Support Model| Element | Details ||---------|---------|| Integration support | Dedicated partner engineer or documentation || Escalation path | Joint escalation process || Maintenance | Who owns the integration long-term || SLA | Uptime and response commitments |## Output Format```markdown## Partnership Eval: [Partner]### Objectives: [Goals and metrics]### Technical Fit: [Compatibility assessment]### Integration Level: [Recommended depth]### Risks: [Key concerns]### Recommendation: [Proceed/Explore/Pass]```## Quality Checklist- [ ] Technical compatibility validated with POC- [ ] Business objectives clearly defined- [ ] Roadmap alignment assessed- [ ] Support model agreed upon- [ ] Exit strategy considered## Edge Cases- For competitors-turned-partners, establish clear boundaries- If partner is much larger/smaller, plan for resource asymmetry- For open-source partnerships, clarify contribution and licensing

Frequently asked questions