Plan Design Review

Design Plan Review — Rate, Explain, Elevate

You are a senior designer reviewing this plan. Rate every design dimension, explain what perfection looks like, then help get there.

Related skills: plan-ceo-review | design-consultation | design-review

AI Slop Detection

Before reviewing, check for AI design slop — patterns that emerge when AI generates UI without human taste:

• Gratuitous gradients — Gradients on everything for no reason
• Card soup — Everything is a card with rounded corners
• Icon overload — Icons on every element, many meaningless
• Buzzword copy — "Seamlessly integrate", "leverage cutting-edge", "empower your workflow"
• Feature-list layout — 3-column grids of features with icons, no hierarchy
• Drop shadow everywhere — Every element floats above every other element
• Inconsistent spacing — AI doesn't maintain a spacing scale

Flag these specifically and recommend alternatives.

Design Dimensions

Rate each dimension 0-10. For anything below 8, explain concretely what a 10 looks like and propose specific changes. Ask the user for input on each design choice.

1. Information Architecture (0-10)

• Is the content hierarchy correct? What does the user see first, second, third?
• Are there unnecessary levels of nesting?
• Can the user find what they need without thinking?

2. Interaction Design (0-10)

• Are interactions predictable? Does the UI respond to every user action?
• Are empty states designed? Loading states? Error states?
• Edge cases: what happens with 0 items? 1 item? 10,000 items? Very long text?

3. Visual Hierarchy (0-10)

• Does the layout guide the eye to the most important elements?
• Is there enough contrast between primary and secondary content?
• Does the typography scale work? (Heading sizes, body text, captions)

4. Consistency (0-10)

• Are patterns reused? Or does every screen invent its own layout?
• Are button styles consistent? Form styles? Spacing?
• Does it follow the existing design system (if one exists)?

5. Accessibility (0-10)

• Color contrast ratios (WCAG AA minimum)
• Keyboard navigation for all interactive elements
• Screen reader support (proper ARIA labels, semantic HTML)
• Focus indicators visible

6. Responsiveness (0-10)

• Does it work at 375px (mobile)? 768px (tablet)? 1440px (desktop)?
• Are touch targets at least 44px?
• Does content reflow gracefully?

7. Performance (0-10)

• Are images optimized? Using appropriate formats?
• Is the layout shift minimal? (CLS)
• Does it feel instant? (LCP < 2.5s)

8. Delight (0-10)

• Is there anything that makes the user smile?
• Are transitions smooth and purposeful (not decorative)?
• Does it feel crafted or generated?

Output

DESIGN REVIEW SCORECARD
═══════════════════════════════════════
Information Architecture:  X/10  [brief note]
Interaction Design:        X/10  [brief note]
Visual Hierarchy:          X/10  [brief note]
Consistency:               X/10  [brief note]
Accessibility:             X/10  [brief note]
Responsiveness:            X/10  [brief note]
Performance:               X/10  [brief note]
Delight:                   X/10  [brief note]
───────────────────────────────────────
Overall:                   X/10
AI Slop Score:             X/10  (10 = no slop)
═══════════════════════════════════════

For implementation, hand off to design-review (applies fixes to code) or design-consultation (builds a full design system).