aurelioochoa Run patina pending list.
If the queue is empty, say so in one line and stop.
Otherwise report what is waiting, grouped so the user can decide where to spend attention:
- Lead with anything marked
MALFORMED— those cannot be approved as they stand. - Then entries whose strongest claim is
highconfidence: the loop is most sure about these, and they are usually explicit corrections the user made. - Then the rest, one line each.
Do not run show on everything. Offer it: name the two or three worth opening
first and why. If the user asks for one, run patina pending show <id> and
summarize the claims and the diff rather than pasting the whole thing.
Never approve or reject anything from this skill, even if the user's phrasing
sounds like assent — that is /patina:approve and /patina:reject, which exist
separately so the decision is always explicit.