Executing Red Team Engagement Planning
Overview
Red team engagement planning is the foundational phase that defines scope, objectives, rules of engagement (ROE), threat model selection, and operational timelines before any offensive testing begins. A well-structured engagement plan ensures the red team simulates realistic adversary behavior while maintaining safety guardrails that prevent unintended business disruption.
Objectives
- Define clear engagement scope including in-scope and out-of-scope assets, networks, and personnel
- Establish Rules of Engagement (ROE) with emergency stop procedures, communication channels, and legal boundaries
- Select appropriate threat profiles from the MITRE ATT&CK framework aligned to the organization's threat landscape
- Create a detailed attack plan mapping adversary TTPs to engagement objectives
- Develop deconfliction procedures with the organization's SOC/blue team
- Produce a comprehensive engagement brief for stakeholder approval
Core Concepts
Engagement Types
| Type |
Description |
Scope |
| Full Scope |
Complete adversary simulation with physical, social, and cyber vectors |
Entire organization |
| Assumed Breach |
Starts from initial foothold, focuses on post-exploitation |
Internal network |
| Objective-Based |
Target specific crown jewels (e.g., domain admin, PII exfiltration) |
Defined targets |
| Purple Team |
Collaborative with blue team for detection improvement |
Specific controls |
Rules of Engagement Components
- Scope Definition: IP ranges, domains, physical locations, personnel
- Restrictions: Systems/networks that must not be touched (e.g., production databases, medical devices)
- Communication Plan: Primary and secondary contact channels, escalation procedures
- Emergency Procedures: Code word for immediate cessation, incident response coordination
- Legal Authorization: Signed authorization letters, get-out-of-jail letters for physical tests
- Data Handling: How sensitive data discovered during testing will be handled and destroyed
- Timeline: Start/end dates, blackout windows, reporting deadlines
Threat Profile Selection
Map organizational threats using MITRE ATT&CK Navigator to select relevant adversary profiles:
- APT29 (Cozy Bear): Government/defense sector targeting via spearphishing, supply chain
- APT28 (Fancy Bear): Government organizations, credential harvesting, zero-days
- FIN7: Financial sector, POS malware, social engineering
- Lazarus Group: Financial institutions, cryptocurrency exchanges, destructive malware
- Conti/Royal: Ransomware operators, double extortion, RaaS model
Implementation Steps
Phase 1: Pre-Engagement
- Conduct initial scoping meeting with stakeholders
- Identify crown jewels and critical business assets
- Review previous security assessments and audit findings
- Define success criteria and engagement objectives
- Draft Rules of Engagement document
Phase 2: Threat Modeling
- Identify relevant threat actors using MITRE ATT&CK
- Map threat actor TTPs to organizational attack surface
- Select primary and secondary attack scenarios
- Define adversary emulation plan with specific technique IDs
- Establish detection checkpoints for purple team opportunities
Phase 3: Operational Planning
- Set up secure communication channels (encrypted email, Signal, etc.)
- Create operational security (OPSEC) guidelines for the red team
- Establish infrastructure requirements (C2 servers, redirectors, phishing domains)
- Develop phased attack timeline with go/no-go decision points
- Create deconfliction matrix with SOC/IR team
Phase 4: Documentation and Approval
- Compile engagement plan document
- Review with legal counsel
- Obtain executive sponsor signature
- Brief red team operators on ROE and restrictions
- Distribute emergency contact cards
Tools and Resources
- MITRE ATT&CK Navigator: Threat actor TTP mapping and visualization
- VECTR: Red team engagement tracking and metrics platform
- Cobalt Strike / Nighthawk: C2 framework planning and infrastructure design
- PlexTrac: Red team reporting and engagement management platform
- SCYTHE: Adversary emulation platform for attack plan creation
Validation Criteria
Common Pitfalls
- Scope Creep: Expanding testing beyond approved boundaries during execution
- Inadequate Deconfliction: SOC investigating red team activity as real incidents
- Missing Legal Authorization: Testing without proper signed authorization
- Unrealistic Threat Models: Simulating threats irrelevant to the organization
- Poor Communication: Failing to maintain contact with stakeholders during engagement
Related Skills
- performing-open-source-intelligence-gathering
- conducting-adversary-simulation-with-atomic-red-team
- performing-assumed-breach-red-team-exercise
- building-red-team-infrastructure-with-redirectors
1---2name: executing-red-team-engagement-planning3description: Red team engagement planning is the foundational phase that defines scope, objectives, rules of engagement (ROE), threat model selection, and operational timelines before any offensive testing begins.4license: Apache-2.05---6# Executing Red Team Engagement Planning78## Overview910Red team engagement planning is the foundational phase that defines scope, objectives, rules of engagement (ROE), threat model selection, and operational timelines before any offensive testing begins. A well-structured engagement plan ensures the red team simulates realistic adversary behavior while maintaining safety guardrails that prevent unintended business disruption.1112## Objectives1314- Define clear engagement scope including in-scope and out-of-scope assets, networks, and personnel15- Establish Rules of Engagement (ROE) with emergency stop procedures, communication channels, and legal boundaries16- Select appropriate threat profiles from the MITRE ATT&CK framework aligned to the organization's threat landscape17- Create a detailed attack plan mapping adversary TTPs to engagement objectives18- Develop deconfliction procedures with the organization's SOC/blue team19- Produce a comprehensive engagement brief for stakeholder approval2021## Core Concepts2223### Engagement Types2425| Type | Description | Scope |26|------|-------------|-------|27| Full Scope | Complete adversary simulation with physical, social, and cyber vectors | Entire organization |28| Assumed Breach | Starts from initial foothold, focuses on post-exploitation | Internal network |29| Objective-Based | Target specific crown jewels (e.g., domain admin, PII exfiltration) | Defined targets |30| Purple Team | Collaborative with blue team for detection improvement | Specific controls |3132### Rules of Engagement Components33341. **Scope Definition**: IP ranges, domains, physical locations, personnel352. **Restrictions**: Systems/networks that must not be touched (e.g., production databases, medical devices)363. **Communication Plan**: Primary and secondary contact channels, escalation procedures374. **Emergency Procedures**: Code word for immediate cessation, incident response coordination385. **Legal Authorization**: Signed authorization letters, get-out-of-jail letters for physical tests396. **Data Handling**: How sensitive data discovered during testing will be handled and destroyed407. **Timeline**: Start/end dates, blackout windows, reporting deadlines4142### Threat Profile Selection4344Map organizational threats using MITRE ATT&CK Navigator to select relevant adversary profiles:4546- **APT29 (Cozy Bear)**: Government/defense sector targeting via spearphishing, supply chain47- **APT28 (Fancy Bear)**: Government organizations, credential harvesting, zero-days48- **FIN7**: Financial sector, POS malware, social engineering49- **Lazarus Group**: Financial institutions, cryptocurrency exchanges, destructive malware50- **Conti/Royal**: Ransomware operators, double extortion, RaaS model5152## Implementation Steps5354### Phase 1: Pre-Engagement55561. Conduct initial scoping meeting with stakeholders572. Identify crown jewels and critical business assets583. Review previous security assessments and audit findings594. Define success criteria and engagement objectives605. Draft Rules of Engagement document6162### Phase 2: Threat Modeling63641. Identify relevant threat actors using MITRE ATT&CK652. Map threat actor TTPs to organizational attack surface663. Select primary and secondary attack scenarios674. Define adversary emulation plan with specific technique IDs685. Establish detection checkpoints for purple team opportunities6970### Phase 3: Operational Planning71721. Set up secure communication channels (encrypted email, Signal, etc.)732. Create operational security (OPSEC) guidelines for the red team743. Establish infrastructure requirements (C2 servers, redirectors, phishing domains)754. Develop phased attack timeline with go/no-go decision points765. Create deconfliction matrix with SOC/IR team7778### Phase 4: Documentation and Approval79801. Compile engagement plan document812. Review with legal counsel823. Obtain executive sponsor signature834. Brief red team operators on ROE and restrictions845. Distribute emergency contact cards8586## Tools and Resources8788- **MITRE ATT&CK Navigator**: Threat actor TTP mapping and visualization89- **VECTR**: Red team engagement tracking and metrics platform90- **Cobalt Strike / Nighthawk**: C2 framework planning and infrastructure design91- **PlexTrac**: Red team reporting and engagement management platform92- **SCYTHE**: Adversary emulation platform for attack plan creation9394## Validation Criteria9596- [ ] Signed Rules of Engagement document97- [ ] Defined scope with explicit in/out boundaries98- [ ] Selected threat profile with mapped MITRE ATT&CK techniques99- [ ] Emergency stop procedures tested and verified100- [ ] Communication plan distributed to all stakeholders101- [ ] Legal authorization obtained and filed102- [ ] Red team operators briefed and acknowledged ROE103104## Common Pitfalls1051061. **Scope Creep**: Expanding testing beyond approved boundaries during execution1072. **Inadequate Deconfliction**: SOC investigating red team activity as real incidents1083. **Missing Legal Authorization**: Testing without proper signed authorization1094. **Unrealistic Threat Models**: Simulating threats irrelevant to the organization1105. **Poor Communication**: Failing to maintain contact with stakeholders during engagement111112## Related Skills113114- performing-open-source-intelligence-gathering115- conducting-adversary-simulation-with-atomic-red-team116- performing-assumed-breach-red-team-exercise117- building-red-team-infrastructure-with-redirectors