Report

report — Comprehensive Bug Report and GitHub Issue Creation

Runtime syntax: invoke the plugin copy through the active runtime's owner-qualified skill selector; use a bare selector only when intentionally selecting a user-tier copy (a separately installed personal copy; Genie no longer seeds this tier). Cross-skill prose below uses bare names as portable semantic routes; the orchestrator resolves the selector for the active runtime.

Investigate a bug end-to-end: collect symptoms, run trace for root cause, capture browser evidence when available, pull observability data from project-configured tools, and prepare a GitHub issue with all findings attached. Investigation only — the deliverable is findings, never fixes; report must not modify source code. Creating the issue is a separate external write and requires explicit confirmation unless the user already asked for issue creation.

When to Use

• A bug needs a thorough, documented investigation before fixing
• A GitHub issue is needed with reproduction steps, root cause, and evidence
• A self-contained report is wanted that someone can act on without reproducing
• QA-loop failures against wish acceptance criteria need investigation

QA Loop Integration

When invoked during the QA loop (after merge to dev):

1. Read the wish's criteria from .genie/wishes/<slug>/WISH.md.
2. Map each failure to the criterion it violates: Criterion: "<text>" — FAIL.
3. Chain: QA failure → report → trace → fix → retest.

Flow

Phase 1: Collect Symptoms

Gather bug description (required), plus URL, error messages, and expected-vs-actual behavior when offered. If detail is missing, ask clarifying questions one at a time via native user-input surface — minimum viable input is a bug description.

Phase 2: Run trace (always)

The backbone of every report. Dispatch a trace subagent via the native delegation surface with a read-only brief: the symptoms, relevant files, and the expected deliverable (the trace report format — root cause file:line, evidence, causal chain, recommended correction, affected scope, confidence). The subagent notifies you with its findings as its final message; follow-ups go through native follow-up messaging. If root cause cannot be determined, note "Code investigation incomplete — trace could not determine root cause" and continue.

Phase 3: Browser Evidence (opportunistic)

Requires the agent-browser CLI on PATH. Attempt when a URL was provided, a dev server is on a common port (3000, 3001, 4200, 5173, 5174, 8080, 8000), or package.json has a startable dev/start script.

Also capture console errors/warnings and failed or slow network requests. Prefer screenshots over video. Unavailable → skip with note: "Browser evidence not available — no URL provided and no dev server detected."

Phase 4: Observability Data (project-dependent)

Detect configured tools, pull recent related errors from each; integrations are independent — one failing never blocks the others.

Nothing found → skip with note: "No observability integrations detected in this project."

Phase 5: Compile Report

Merge all evidence into the issue body per references/issue-template.md. Grounded evidence rule: every statement in the report traces to tool output from this investigation — trace findings, captured artifacts, command output. State per evidence source whether it was captured, failed, or skipped (and why); never present a planned capture as evidence.

Phase 6: Create GitHub Issue When Authorized

1. Search existing issues through the GitHub connector; link an identical open issue instead of creating a duplicate.
2. Present the exact repository, title, body summary, and labels and obtain confirmation unless issue creation was explicit in the request.
3. Prefer the GitHub connector for creation. Use gh only when connector coverage is unavailable; pass the report via a body file or stdin rather than interpolating user text into a shell command.
4. Labels: bug plus existing area labels supported by repository conventions; do not invent labels blindly.
5. If authentication or creation fails, return the full report for manual submission.

Degradation Rules

Each phase is independent — failure in one never blocks the others. The report is always produced; the only question is how rich the evidence is.

Board Tracking (optional)

The GitHub issue is the primary artifact. If the bug should also appear on the genie board:

genie task create --title "bug: <title> (gh#<issue-number>)"

If task creation fails (no .genie/genie.db), skip it — board tracking never blocks the report.

Example

User reports: "dispatched engineers sit idle at an empty prompt."

1. Symptoms collected: command run, observed behavior (empty prompt, no task received).
2. Trace subagent dispatched (native delegation surface, read-only) → returns: dispatch.ts:532 — handleWorkerSpawn called without initialPrompt; 4/6 engineers received no message. Confidence: high.
3. Evidence captured: screenshot of the idle pane; genie task list --json showing the group in_progress with no progress.
4. Issue prepared and, after authorization, created through the GitHub connector — body carries root cause, causal chain, reproduction steps, and both artifacts.

Rules

• Always run trace first — it is the backbone of every report.
• One question at a time when collecting symptoms.
• Never modify source code — investigation only; hand corrections to fix.
• Screenshots and video are evidence, not decoration — capture only what is relevant.
• Be explicit about what was not captured and why.
• The report must be self-contained — readable and actionable without reproducing the bug.