MCP Sdk Audit

Absorbing a @modelcontextprotocol/server release into Figwright, end to end: audit → upgrade → prove the wire contract is unchanged.

Do not reason about this the way figma-typings-audit reasons about plugin typings. That package is types-only, so tsc is a real gate. This one is a runtime dependency: it serializes every tool result, generates the JSON Schema for every tool, and negotiates the protocol version. A release can leave every type identical and still change what clients see. pnpm typecheck will stay green through it.

Unlike every other dependency here, this one has a dedicated gate — use it. packages/mcp/test/e2e/mcp-wire.test.ts spawns the built dist over real stdio, speaks raw JSON-RPC at it, and asserts the advertised contract against what the specs declare. It runs in pnpm test. That gate answers did anything break; it does not answer what moved, which is what an audit is for — Stage 5 covers the difference.

Know the one thing that gate cannot see. Its schema check compares the SDK's output against test/tool-schema.ts's derivation, and both call the same z.toJSONSchema. That is independent of the SDK — it catches an SDK that stops asking Zod the same question — but not of Zod: when Zod changes what it answers, both sides move together and the equality still holds. An SDK bump that also moves the resolved zod version (its range is ^4.2.0, so it shares the repo's copy) can therefore reshape every client's schema with this gate green. packages/mcp/test/json-schema-generation.test.ts covers that half by pinning each construct's rendering by hand — if a bump moves the Zod version, read its diff too, and let probe.mjs name which tools changed.

Target version: whatever the user named, otherwise the latest @modelcontextprotocol/server on npm.

Stage 0 — Resolve versions

grep '@modelcontextprotocol' packages/mcp/package.json          # declared range
grep -m1 '@modelcontextprotocol/server@' pnpm-lock.yaml         # what is installed
npm view @modelcontextprotocol/server version dist-tags --json  # latest
gh api repos/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/releases --jq '.[0:15][] | "\(.tag_name)\t\(.published_at)"'

Figwright is on v2 — the package family (@modelcontextprotocol/server + its transitive /core, with /client, /node, /express, /hono, /fastify, /server-legacy, /codemod alongside). It depends on exactly one of them.

Two things the releases list will show that are not upgrades for us:

• Bare 1.30.0-style tags are the v1 legacy line (@modelcontextprotocol/sdk, source on the long-lived v1.x branch). Figwright left it; a v1 tag is not our concern.
• @modelcontextprotocol/{client,express,fastify,hono,node,server-legacy,codemod}@X tags ship on the same version number as server but are packages we do not install.

If installed and target are equal, say so and stop.

Stage 1 — Read the release notes as an index, not as an answer

The GitHub Releases body is an auto-generated list of PR titles, written for SDK contributors: it says what was changed, never who is affected. "stdio buffer limit" reads like it belongs to whoever runs stdio; the useful question is which package and which directory it landed in.

So use the notes only to get the PR numbers, then ask each PR what it touched:

gh api repos/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/releases --jq '.[] | select(.tag_name=="@modelcontextprotocol/server@<target>") | .body'
# then, per PR number in that body:
gh pr view <n> --repo modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk --json title,files \
  --jq '"\(.title)\n  " + (.files | map(.path) | join("\n  "))'

⚠️ Read the whole file list, never just the first entry. v2 splits one concern across packages by design — a wire change routinely lands in packages/core-internal/src/wire/, packages/server/src/server/, and packages/client/src/ at once. Judging a PR by its first file is how the hunk that mattered gets missed.

Stage 2 — Sort by file path

Figwright imports exactly two entry points (packages/mcp/src/index.ts, src/prompts/*, test/tool-schema.ts, test/e2e/mcp-wire.test.ts): @modelcontextprotocol/server and @modelcontextprotocol/server/stdio. That narrow slice is what makes this audit cheap — most of any given release is about parts of the family this server never loads.

The packages/client/** row is the subtle one: a limit added to the client's read path applies to Figwright's responses, since the client is what reads them. get_screenshot returns inline base64 and get_design_context returns large JSON, so client-side ceilings are a real exposure even though Figwright ships no client.

Stage 3 — Cross-check against the published dist

The PR list is a claim about the release; the tarball is the release. Confirm they agree — and catch anything that reached the build without a listed PR:

cd "$SCRATCH" && mkdir -p mcp-sdk-audit && cd mcp-sdk-audit
npm pack @modelcontextprotocol/server@<installed> @modelcontextprotocol/server@<target> \
         @modelcontextprotocol/core@<installed> @modelcontextprotocol/core@<target> \
         --pack-destination .
for p in server core; do for v in <installed> <target>; do
  mkdir -p "$p-$v" && tar -xzf "modelcontextprotocol-$p-$v.tgz" -C "$p-$v" --strip-components=1
done; done
diff -ru --exclude='*.map' server-<installed>/dist server-<target>/dist > server.diff
grep '^diff ' server.diff        # the file list — compare against Stage 2

v2 emits .mjs/.cjs siblings in a flat dist/ with content-hashed chunk names (dist/mcp-DXXb3Vv3.mjs), so a chunk filename changing between versions is noise, not signal — diff by content, and expect the whole-file rename churn. dist/**/*.d.mts hunks are the type-level surface (what tsc would catch); .mjs hunks with no .d.mts counterpart are the dangerous kind — behavior changed, signature didn't.

Also diff package.json between the two versions: engines.node, dependencies (the pinned @modelcontextprotocol/core version and zod's supported range) all move without appearing in the source diff. v2 declares zod as a real dependency, not a peer — a range bump there can nest a second zod copy beside the repo's own.

Stage 4 — Classify

1. Type-level — a changed export in dist/**/*.d.mts that Figwright names. tsc covers these; confirm in Stage 6 rather than reasoning about them.
2. ★ Wire behavior — the recurring shapes:
   • the negotiated protocol version (LATEST_PROTOCOL_VERSION, SUPPORTED_PROTOCOL_VERSIONS, FIRST_MODERN_PROTOCOL_VERSION) — moving it changes what every connecting client sees, and dropping an old entry can cut off an older client outright;
   • the JSON Schema generated per tool — one for every tool Figwright registers, they are the LLM's entire spec, and a $ref/allOf/additionalProperties shift has broken third-party clients before (see project_moonshot_ref_immunity);
   • era selection in serveStdio — which revision a given opening exchange lands on;
   • stdio framing and buffering — message size ceilings, chunk handling, error-on-overflow;
   • error and result serialization — what a tool-call rejection looks like to the model.
3. Dependency / supply chain — engines.node vs the repo's ^20.19.0 || >=22.12.0, the zod range against zod@^4, transitive advisories. Note what pnpm install flags.

Bucket 2 is the whole reason this skill exists. Never claim a bucket-2 item is safe from the diff alone — Stage 5 settles it.

Stage 5 — Run the gate, then diff the delta

Two different questions, two tools. Run both.

The gate — did anything break?

pnpm build && pnpm vitest run packages/mcp/test/e2e/mcp-wire.test.ts

It asserts the advertised tool set, each tool's JSON Schema against a derivation that is independent of the SDK (but not of Zod — see above), the dialect, annotations, prompts, a live tools/call, the bad-argument path, and that a 2024-11-05 client is still served. Red here means the release moved something that matters. If the bump also moved zod, run pnpm vitest run packages/mcp/test/json-schema-generation.test.ts as a second gate.

The probe — what moved? A gate is a boolean; an audit has to name the change. probe.mjs boots the same built server, snapshots everything a client can observe, and diffs two snapshots.

REPO=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
pnpm build                                                   # the probe reads dist, not src
node "$REPO/.claude/skills/mcp-sdk-audit/probe.mjs" "$REPO" "$SCRATCH/mcp-sdk-audit/base.json"
# ...upgrade (Stage 6), pnpm build again, then:
node "$REPO/.claude/skills/mcp-sdk-audit/probe.mjs" "$REPO" "$SCRATCH/mcp-sdk-audit/after.json"
node "$REPO/.claude/skills/mcp-sdk-audit/probe.mjs" --diff "$SCRATCH/mcp-sdk-audit/base.json" "$SCRATCH/mcp-sdk-audit/after.json"

Notes that matter:

• pnpm build first, every time. The MCP server runs the built dist; probing a stale bundle reports the previous SDK. (A stale dist left behind by an abandoned upgrade is also unrunnable — it imports a package the current node_modules no longer has.)
• Both the gate and the probe run the server on a random high port via FIGWRIGHT_PORT, so neither contends for 3055 or steals a connected plugin. Neither needs a plugin — ping answers without one.
• A baseline captured after upgrading is worthless. If the bump already happened (a Renovate branch), take the baseline from main in a git worktree, pnpm install, build, probe, then come back. probe.mjs reads the installed version out of the lockfile, so a v1 baseline needs that one regex pointed at @modelcontextprotocol/sdk@.

Stage 6 — Upgrade and run the gates

pnpm -C packages/mcp add @modelcontextprotocol/server@^<target>
pnpm typecheck && pnpm lint && pnpm format:check && pnpm knip && pnpm build && pnpm test

This and the lockfile are the only writes to the repo; everything before was read-only. All six gates green and an empty probe diff is the pass condition — neither alone is one, though the six now include the wire gate, which is what made them worth trusting.

Stage 7 — Report in 繁體中文台灣用語

Ordered by consequence:

1. 線上契約有沒有動 — the probe diff: protocol version, tool count, per-tool schema hashes, annotations, prompts. Name the tools that changed, or state plainly that none did.
2. 會壞掉的 — bucket 1, with the gate verdict.
3. 要知道但不用動的 — bucket 2/3 items that exist in the release but cannot reach this server (a client-side limit, an HTTP transport fix). Say why it cannot reach us; that reasoning is the deliverable, and it is what makes the next audit cheap.
4. 新能力 — anything the SDK now exposes that Figwright could use, one line each.

Report only what the diff and the probe showed. Don't pad with plausible-sounding changes, and never claim a verification you didn't run.

Then AskUserQuestion over the items from 3 and 4 that would need work.

Stage 8 — Hand off the live verification

The gate and the probe prove the server speaks correctly to a test harness. They do not prove real clients are happy:

• The MCP server runs the built dist → pnpm build, then the user reconnects the MCP connection (.mcp.json launches packages/mcp/dist/index.mjs).
• Ask the user to run one read tool (ping, then something with a real payload like get_design_context) through the reconnected server with the plugin open.
• If the release touched protocol-version constants or schema generation, that check should ideally happen in more than one client — Claude Code, Cursor, Codex ship different SDK versions (many still on v1), and the failure mode is exactly a version mismatch between the two ends.

Say what was actually run. If the live step didn't happen, say that.