Deal Memo Drafting
Problem
The hardest part of memo drafting is not prose. It is turning incomplete diligence, competing evidence, and meeting fragments into a clean recommendation without hiding the gaps.
Audience
- Primary: investors and diligence teams
- Secondary: operators writing partnership, acquisition, or strategic decision memos
When to Use
- Drafting an IC memo or deal memo from an existing diligence packet
- Turning research, model review, and meeting notes into a single recommendation document
- Producing a first-pass memo that makes open questions and decision risk explicit
When Not to Use
- Raw market mapping without a memo deliverable: use
competitive-analysis - Reviewing a model in isolation: use
financial-model-review - Synthesizing a source set before the memo is ready to draft: use
research-synthesis - Cleaning a transcript or extracting actions: use
meeting-synthesis
Required Context
Gather or confirm:
- the memo type: deal, IC, partnership, acquisition, board, or internal decision memo
- the target audience and decision owner
- research findings, market context, and supporting docs
- model review findings if economics matter
- meeting outputs if decision-makers or management conversations matter
- the current state of conviction and the biggest open questions
Process
- Frame the memo.
- State the decision the memo supports.
- State the audience and how formal the document should be.
- Inventory the evidence.
- Separate confirmed findings, inferences, and unresolved gaps.
- Build the memo spine.
- Thesis, market, business, economics, risks, open questions, recommendation.
- Draft with explicit honesty.
- If a section is weak because the diligence is weak, say so.
- Do not quietly fill missing evidence with confident prose.
- Tighten for decision-readiness.
- End with what the decision-maker should do, why, and what still needs verification.
- Optionally use Open Brain.
- Search for prior deal notes, past meetings, or earlier thesis fragments.
- Capture the final memo summary or recommendation after the draft is complete.
Evidence and Judgment Rules
- Use the best available evidence from research, model review, and meetings.
- Always distinguish known facts from inference and unresolved gaps.
- Never overstate conviction just to make the memo feel complete.
- If economics are weak or unclear, say the memo should not lean on them heavily.
- Preserve contradictory evidence where it materially changes the recommendation.
Output
Default output:
- thesis or recommendation summary
- market and business summary
- economics or model implications when relevant
- key risks and open questions
- recommendation with explicit confidence and next-step requirements
Works Well With
competitive-analysisfor market and positioning sectionsfinancial-model-reviewfor economics and downside framingresearch-synthesisfor source-backed findings and contradictionsmeeting-synthesisfor management, partner, or internal decision input
Notes
- This skill drafts from diligence. It should not pretend to replace diligence.
- A good memo is allowed to say "not ready", "needs more proof", or "do not proceed yet".