Benchmark Chonk

Benchmark Chonk

Run realistic Chonk IVC benchmarks using pinned protocol inputs (real transaction flows captured from end-to-end tests).

Chonk has no synthetic micro-benchmark. Always benchmark Chonk via bb prove --scheme chonk against pinned ivc-inputs.msgpack for real transaction flows. If a Chonk proving question seems to call for a micro-benchmark, the answer is still bb prove on a real flow.

Step 1: Get pinned IVC inputs

The real benchmark inputs are pinned to an S3 artifact keyed by a 16-character hash prefix. Download them:

barretenberg/cpp/scripts/chonk_inputs.sh download

This populates barretenberg/cpp/chonk-pinned-flows/<flow>/ivc-inputs.msgpack.

Available flows (typical):

• ecdsar1+transfer_1_recursions+sponsored_fpc
• schnorr+deploy_tokenContract_with_registration+sponsored_fpc
• ecdsar1+amm_add_liquidity_1_recursions+sponsored_fpc
• ecdsar1+transfer_1_recursions+private_fpc
• and more under barretenberg/cpp/chonk-pinned-flows/ after downloading

The pinned hash prefix is maintained in barretenberg/cpp/scripts/chonk-inputs.hash. The S3 URL is:

https://aztec-ci-artifacts.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/protocol/bb-chonk-inputs-<hash>.tar.gz

To update the pinned inputs (after protocol changes that affect VKs):

barretenberg/cpp/scripts/chonk_inputs.sh update

Step 2: Build bb

cd barretenberg/cpp
cmake --preset clang20
cmake --build --preset clang20 --target bb

Build dir: build. To use a different native preset, build with that preset and set NATIVE_PRESET when running the benchmark script.

Step 3: Run the benchmark

Always set HARDWARE_CONCURRENCY=8 for local runs. The remote benchmarking machine uses 16, but local/shared machines should use 8. See /remote-bench for remote execution.

Native

For the standard local path, download the pinned inputs and use the same benchmark script CI uses:

barretenberg/cpp/scripts/chonk_inputs.sh download
HARDWARE_CONCURRENCY=8 barretenberg/cpp/scripts/ci_benchmark_ivc_flows.sh native

The benchmark script defaults to ecdsar1+transfer_0_recursions+sponsored_fpc. If a flow fails, the pinned inputs remain in barretenberg/cpp/chonk-pinned-flows/<flow>/ivc-inputs.msgpack; rerun the same case by passing the flow directory:

HARDWARE_CONCURRENCY=8 barretenberg/cpp/scripts/ci_benchmark_ivc_flows.sh native \
  barretenberg/cpp/chonk-pinned-flows/<flow>

The CI benchmark also cross-checks the proof against the generated protocol VK artifacts under noir-projects/fnd/noir-protocol-circuits/target. That is a post-prove check, not part of the pinned input download.

For manual runs:

cd barretenberg/cpp

FLOW="schnorr+deploy_tokenContract_with_registration+sponsored_fpc"
OUTPUT_DIR="/tmp/chonk-bench-out"
mkdir -p $OUTPUT_DIR

HARDWARE_CONCURRENCY=8 ./build/bin/bb prove \
  -o $OUTPUT_DIR \
  --ivc_inputs_path chonk-pinned-flows/$FLOW/ivc-inputs.msgpack \
  --scheme chonk \
  -v \
  --print_bench \
  --bench_out_hierarchical $OUTPUT_DIR/benchmark_breakdown.json

WASM (via wasmtime)

Use the CI benchmark script with the WASM runtime:

barretenberg/cpp/scripts/chonk_inputs.sh download
HARDWARE_CONCURRENCY=8 barretenberg/cpp/scripts/ci_benchmark_ivc_flows.sh wasm

For manual runs:

Build the WASM binary with threads enabled:

cd barretenberg/cpp
cmake --preset wasm-threads
cmake --build --preset wasm-threads --target bb

Run via wasmtime (the scripts/wasmtime.sh wrapper sets standard flags):

cd barretenberg/cpp

FLOW="schnorr+deploy_tokenContract_with_registration+sponsored_fpc"
OUTPUT_DIR="/tmp/chonk-bench-wasm"
mkdir -p $OUTPUT_DIR

# Copy inputs to a working dir wasmtime can access
cp chonk-pinned-flows/$FLOW/ivc-inputs.msgpack $OUTPUT_DIR/

cd $OUTPUT_DIR
HARDWARE_CONCURRENCY=8 BB_BENCH=1 \
  /path/to/barretenberg/cpp/scripts/wasmtime.sh \
  /path/to/barretenberg/cpp/build-wasm-threads/bin/bb prove \
    -o output \
    --ivc_inputs_path ivc-inputs.msgpack \
    --scheme chonk \
    -v \
    --print_bench \
    --bench_out_hierarchical benchmark_breakdown.json

The wasmtime wrapper sets:

• -Wthreads=y -Sthreads=y — enable WASM threads and shared memory
• --env HARDWARE_CONCURRENCY — thread count
• --env BB_BENCH — enable operation counting (requires configuring with -DENABLE_WASM_BENCH=ON; it is OFF by default in the wasm-threads preset to keep the shipped wasm fast)
• --dir=$HOME/.bb-crs --dir=. — filesystem access for CRS and working directory

Local runs are noisy — average 3 runs

Non-dedicated machines have variable CPU load. Run the benchmark at least 3 times and average the results. Only the remote benchmarking machine (see /remote-bench skill) provides stable, isolated CPU for single-run measurements.

When iterating locally on profiling code changes, relative comparisons (before vs after your change) are still valid on noisy machines — just ensure you compare runs taken close together under similar load.

Using with the remote benchmarking machine

For noise-free, publishable results, use the /remote-bench skill to run on the dedicated EC2 instance. The two skills compose naturally:

1. /benchmark-chonk download-inputs — get pinned inputs locally
2. /remote-bench — build locally, scp binary + inputs to remote, run there, copy results back

See the /remote-bench skill for setup, lock management, and usage.

BB_BENCH instrumentation system

How it works

BB_BENCH is an always-compiled, low-overhead RAII profiling system.

Header: barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/common/bb_bench.hpp Implementation: barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/common/bb_bench.cpp

Macros:

BB_BENCH()                    // label = __func__
BB_BENCH_NAME("label")        // custom label (preferred)
BB_BENCH_ONLY_NAME("label")   // no Tracy, no nesting — lightweight
BB_BENCH_ENABLE_NESTING()     // set parent context for child operations

The macros create BenchReporter RAII objects that:

1. On construction: capture parent context + start time
2. On destruction: record elapsed time with parent association
3. Build a hierarchical call tree automatically

Activation: BB_BENCH=1 env var, or --print_bench / --bench_out_hierarchical CLI flags.

Google Benchmark integration

For .bench.cpp targets that integrate BB_BENCH into Google Benchmark counters:

#include "barretenberg/common/google_bb_bench.hpp"

for (auto _ : state) {
    GOOGLE_BB_BENCH_REPORTER(state);  // clears stats, collects on destruction
    // ... benchmark body ...
}

GOOGLE_BB_BENCH_REPORTER(state) creates a GoogleBbBenchReporter which:

• Constructor: calls GLOBAL_BENCH_STATS.clear() — resets all accumulated stats
• Destructor: aggregates stats into Google Benchmark counters (each operation becomes a (s) suffixed counter)

Per-circuit / per-accumulate breakdown

Key function: bb::detail::GLOBAL_BENCH_STATS.clear() (barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/common/bb_bench.cpp)

void GlobalBenchStatsContainer::clear()
{
    std::unique_lock<std::mutex> lock(mutex);
    for (std::shared_ptr<TimeStatsEntry>& entry : entries) {
        entry->count = TimeStats();  // resets to zero without losing entry structure
    }
}

Usage pattern for per-circuit profiling:

The --print_bench output aggregates across all 19 circuits. To get per-circuit timing, temporarily instrument barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/bbapi/bbapi_chonk.cpp:

1. Add #include <chrono> at the top
2. In ChonkAccumulate::execute(), wrap the accumulate() call:

    info("ChonkAccumulate - accumulating circuit '", request.loaded_circuit_name, "'");
    bb::detail::GLOBAL_BENCH_STATS.clear();
    auto circuit_start = std::chrono::steady_clock::now();
    request.ivc_in_progress->accumulate(circuit, precomputed_vk);
    auto circuit_end = std::chrono::steady_clock::now();
    auto circuit_ms = std::chrono::duration_cast<std::chrono::milliseconds>(circuit_end - circuit_start).count();
    info("PER_CIRCUIT_TIME: circuit='",
         request.loaded_circuit_name,
         "' index=",
         request.ivc_stack_depth,
         " time_ms=",
         circuit_ms);
    bb::detail::GLOBAL_BENCH_STATS.print_aggregate_counts_hierarchical(std::cerr);
    request.ivc_stack_depth++;

3. Rebuild with cd build && ninja bb (only recompiles the changed file + relinks)
4. Run the benchmark, then grep for PER_CIRCUIT_TIME in the output
5. Revert the instrumentation after collecting data: git checkout -- barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/bbapi/bbapi_chonk.cpp

This gives wall-clock time per circuit plus a per-circuit BB_BENCH breakdown. The GLOBAL_BENCH_STATS.clear() resets stats before each circuit so the hierarchical print shows only that circuit's work.

The same pattern works at any granularity — clear before, print after. This is how GOOGLE_BB_BENCH_REPORTER works internally.

Output formats

The hierarchical JSON format:

{
  "operation_name": [
    {
      "parent": "parent_operation",
      "time": 1234567890,
      "time_max": 1234567890,
      "time_mean": 1234567890.0,
      "time_stddev": 12345.0,
      "count": 5,
      "num_threads": 8
    }
  ]
}

Adding new instrumentation

When profiling reveals "missing time" (parent time - sum of children > 20%), add BB_BENCH_NAME to the uninstrumented functions:

#include "barretenberg/common/bb_bench.hpp"

void MyProver::execute_phase() {
    BB_BENCH_NAME("MyProver::execute_phase");
    BB_BENCH_ENABLE_NESTING();  // allow child operations to track this as parent
    // ... function body ...
}

Rules:

• Place macro as the first statement in the scope you want to measure
• Use descriptive names: "Chonk::accumulate::oink_phase" not "oink"
• For templates: BB_BENCH_NAME("ShpleminiProver<Flavor>::prove") since __func__ is ugly
• For sub-scopes, use braces to create a new scope
• BB_BENCH_ENABLE_NESTING() is needed when you want child BB_BENCH_NAME calls inside this function to show this function as their parent in the hierarchy

Extracting component benchmarks

After running with --bench_out_hierarchical, extract key components:

python3 barretenberg/cpp/scripts/extract_component_benchmarks.py <output_dir> <name_path>

This reads benchmark_breakdown.json, finds operations matching key components (sumcheck, pcs, pippenger, commitment, circuit, oink, compute), and appends them to benchmarks.bench.json with stacked chart markers for the dashboard.

A/B comparison

For Chonk A/B between branches, run bb prove --scheme chonk against the same pinned ivc-inputs.msgpack on each branch and compare the resulting --bench_out_hierarchical JSON manually. Use the remote machine (/remote-bench) for stable, single-run numbers.

The generic Google-Benchmark A/B scripts still exist for non-Chonk targets:

Key scripts reference

Tips

• HARDWARE_CONCURRENCY=8 for local, 16 for remote. Always set this explicitly. Local/shared machines use 8; the remote benchmarking machine uses 16.
• Local iteration is fine — you can build, instrument, and run locally. Just average 3 runs for reliable numbers, or use the remote machine via /remote-bench for single-run accuracy.
• Use ./bootstrap.sh for initial builds — it downloads cached artifacts and avoids build issues. Use cmake --preset clang20 && cd build && ninja bb for incremental rebuilds after code changes.
• Build dir is build/ — the clang20 preset outputs to build/, not build-no-avm. The clang20-no-avm preset also uses build/ (it disables AVM at cmake level, not via directory name).
• If the zig cache breaks (missing libubsan_rt.a errors), delete build/ and reconfigure: rm -rf build && cmake --preset clang20.
• WASM preset: wasm-threads. Build dir is build-wasm-threads/. ENABLE_WASM_BENCH is OFF by default (the shipped wasm carries no BB_BENCH instrumentation); configure with cmake --preset wasm-threads -DENABLE_WASM_BENCH=ON when you need wasm op counts, and reconfigure without it afterwards.
• WASM is ~2.8x slower than native — this ratio is consistent across all circuit types.
• CRS: Ensure ~/.bb-crs exists. For WASM, wasmtime needs --dir=$HOME/.bb-crs.
• BB_BENCH=1 vs --print_bench: Either activates profiling. --print_bench also triggers the hierarchical tree output to stderr. In Google-Benchmark targets that wrap their loops with GOOGLE_BB_BENCH_REPORTER, the same activation happens automatically when BB_BENCH=1 is set.
• Dashboard: CI uploads breakdown data to bench/bb-breakdown/ on S3. The dashboard at ci3/dashboard/chonk-breakdowns/ visualizes it.
• Rebuilding after instrumentation changes: Only ninja bb is needed — no need to reconfigure.

Presenting results

When sharing benchmark results, create an HTML report with an interactive visualization. Include:

• Native vs WASM tabs with per-circuit comparison table
• Stacked bar charts showing time distribution across circuits
• Aggregation by circuit type (kernel vs app vs infra)
• Summary cards with total time, slowdown ratio, and heaviest circuit
• Color-coded circuit types: kernel (blue), app (red), infra (gray)

Prefer the benchmark dashboard for CI results. For local comparisons, keep the HTML report as a local artifact unless the reviewer asks for a shared upload.