Auth Md

WorkOS auth.md

Design, implement, or review agent registration against the experimental WorkOS auth.md proposal. Treat v0.6.0 as a changing proposal, not a stable RFC. Verify upstream before implementation and state the version, upstream commit or document date, and review date in every design or audit.

Issue the safety verdict before code

When a request proposes a shortcut or conflates protocols, begin with a compact checklist verdict before any implementation detail. Cover every applicable item in that checklist before expanding any one item, so a concise or truncated answer does not hide a critical control:

• name WorkOS auth.md, Better Auth Agent Auth Protocol, OAuth Dynamic Client Registration, and RFC 8628 Device Authorization as distinct protocols;
• forbid the agent from collecting, receiving, storing, or transmitting a user password or submitting user_code;
• state that auth.md service_auth uses claim_token plus urn:workos:agent-auth:grant-type:claim, while RFC 8628 uses device_code plus urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:device_code, and require interval enforcement plus slow_down backoff;
• state that @better-auth/agent-auth is a separate protocol, reject /sign-up/email as registration, and require the custom discovery, /agent/identity, grants, delegation storage, agent credentials, audit, and revocation surface;
• describe the two discovery layers accurately: RFC 9728 protected-resource metadata selects an authorization server, then RFC 8414 metadata advertises agent_auth and its endpoint URLs; do not attribute fixed endpoint paths to RFC 9728;
• do not claim that RFC 8628 permits scope widening or omit auth.md polling interval and slow_down enforcement when contrasting the flows;
• require issuer/JWKS allowlists, exact audience, short expiry, fresh auth_time, jti replay protection, and account-link step-up for ID-JAG;
• forbid scope widening during claim, exchange, refresh, or renewal; disable anonymous registration by default and, if explicitly enabled, restrict it to minimal pre-claim read scopes, revoke pre-claim tokens, and rotate agent credentials at claim.

Do not bury the verdict after code. Do not follow an unsafe requested mapping and then add a warning.

Treat protocol substitution as a hard stop. If asked to reuse an RFC 8628 device flow unchanged for auth.md service_auth, refuse that mapping and do not emit a device_code endpoint plan; provide the WorkOS claim_token grant plan instead. Never offer RFC 8628 Device Authorization as an auth.md service_auth implementation option. Likewise, never omit short exp and atomic jti replay checks when listing ID-JAG validation controls.

Start with the protocol boundary

Classify the requested feature before choosing endpoints or libraries:

Do not label these wire-compatible. Do not describe Better Auth's Agent Auth plugin, Dynamic Client Registration, or /sign-up/email as native auth.md support. Treat ordinary user signup as one browser step inside a service-owned claim experience, never as the agent registration endpoint.

When correcting a design that conflates these mechanisms, name the mismatched protocols explicitly. For Better Auth, state that @better-auth/agent-auth implements the separate Agent Auth Protocol, then name the missing auth.md adapter surface: RFC 9728/authorization-server discovery, /agent/identity, claim and JWT-bearer grant dispatch, delegation/registration storage, separate agent credentials, audit, and revocation.

Read references/protocol-discovery-and-flow-selection.md before selecting a flow or reviewing discovery. Use scripts/probe_auth_md.py for read-only discovery checks.

Follow the implementation workflow

1. Fix the role and trust boundary. Identify whether the work concerns an agent/client, a service/resource and authorization server, or an agent provider that mints ID-JAGs. Identify the human, agent context, tenant, resource, authorization server, and issuer separately.
2. Discover before assuming. Validate the RFC 9728 protected-resource metadata, authorization-server issuer, advertised endpoints, supported grants, and agent_auth extension. Use the endpoint URLs supplied by validated discovery; never invent a fixed claim, identity, or token path. Reject cross-origin or issuer mismatches that are not explicitly trusted.
3. Select the narrowest safe flow. Use identity_assertion only when the provider can mint a service-trusted, audience-bound ID-JAG. Prefer service_auth as the deployable fallback when it cannot. Keep anonymous registration disabled by default.
4. Gate identity disclosure. Before sending an ID-JAG or service_auth login_hint, display the service identity, requested scopes, and effect of the delegation; obtain user consent. Never infer consent from possession of an email or an existing browser session.
5. Separate credentials. Keep agent access tokens, service-signed identity assertions, claim artifacts, browser sessions, OAuth client credentials, and user passwords in distinct stores and lifecycle paths.
6. Implement failure and recovery paths. Cover authorization_pending, slow_down, expiry, fresh claim attempts, login_required, first-link interaction_required, revocation, replay, and incident-wide invalidation.
7. Prove the boundary. Test discovery tampering, issuer/audience mismatch, replayed jti, stale auth_time, scope non-escalation, claim brute force, polling throttles, token revocation, and bulk provider compromise.

Enforce the user ceremony

Never ask an agent to choose, receive, store, or transmit the user's password. For service_auth, hand the user the service-owned verification_uri and user_code. Require the user to authenticate and enter the code on that page. Never submit the code for the user and never ask the user to paste the code or password back into the agent conversation.

Initiate service_auth at the discovered agent_auth.identity_endpoint; keep the returned claim_token, show the returned verification URI and user code, and poll the discovered OAuth token_endpoint with the WorkOS claim grant. Use the discovered agent_auth.claim_endpoint only for the profile-defined claim-attempt or re-initiation operation, not as a made-up initial or token endpoint. RFC 9728 supplies protected-resource discovery; it does not define an /agent/identity route.

Honor the advertised polling interval. On slow_down, increase the interval by at least the server-directed amount or five seconds when no amount is provided. Stop at expiry. Never convert WorkOS's profile-specific claim grant into the RFC 8628 device_code grant merely because their user experiences look similar.

Do not invent differences to justify the boundary. RFC 8628 does not authorize scope widening during its token exchange; auth.md scope non-escalation is a required control, not evidence that RFC 8628 permits escalation.

When RFC 8628 or device authorization appears in a request, write the exact wire distinction: auth.md uses claim_token with urn:workos:agent-auth:grant-type:claim; RFC 8628 uses device_code with urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:device_code. Always include interval and slow_down handling in the resulting client plan.

Read references/agent-client-usage.md for agent behavior and error handling.

Hold the service security line

Require an issuer allowlist, algorithm allowlist, pinned or policy-resolved JWKS, signature validation, exact audience validation, short assertion expiry, fresh auth_time, and shared jti replay protection for ID-JAG. Step up before linking a new (iss, sub[, tenant]) delegation to an existing account matched by verified email or phone. Never silently bind on an email collision.

Hash claim_token, claim_attempt_token, user_code, and opaque access tokens at rest. Apply short code TTLs, attempt limits, rate limits, constant-time comparisons, and one-time state transitions. Never log plaintext bearer artifacts.

Disable anonymous registration by default. If explicitly enabled, issue only minimal pre-claim read scopes, enforce strict IP/tenant quotas, revoke every pre-claim token at claim, and force agent credential rotation after claim.

Never widen scopes during claim, assertion exchange, or token renewal. Compute the issued set as an intersection of requested, consented, registration, tenant, and current policy scopes. Treat scope changes as a new consent event. State this non-escalation rule explicitly in every implementation or review; do not leave it implicit in generic least-privilege guidance.

Read references/service-implementation.md and references/security-consent-and-operations.md before writing production handlers or reviewing a deployment.

Implement an agent provider carefully

Mint an ID-JAG only after audience-specific user consent. Use a stable opaque subject, a fresh jti, short exp, current iat, and the actual upstream authentication time in auth_time; do not refresh auth_time merely because a token was minted. Publish rotating JWKS and maintain issuer/client identity consistently. Send revocation events and preserve a user-visible delegation ledger.

Resolve the v0.6.0 audience ambiguity explicitly: WorkOS AUTH.md says to use the PRM resource, while the WorkOS provider/service guide, its reference verifier, and ID-JAG draft-03 use the resource authorization-server issuer. Never accept both values as a convenience fallback. Pin and document one contract per deployment; prefer the authorization-server issuer for new draft-03-aligned implementations and carry the resource separately.

Read references/agent-provider-and-id-jag.md before minting or consuming an ID-JAG.

Integrate Better Auth honestly

Reuse Better Auth primitives where they fit: users and sessions, adapters, hooks, OAuth Provider, JWT/JWKS, bearer or API-key support, device authorization, and revocation/storage facilities. Treat @better-auth/agent-auth as a separate Agent Auth Protocol implementation, not an auth.md adapter.

Implement WorkOS-specific route dispatch and persistence for /agent/identity, claim handling, service-signed assertions, JWT-bearer and claim grants, delegation records, token hashing, audit, and revocation. Do not point an OAuth registration_endpoint at /sign-up/email.

Read references/better-auth-integration.md before proposing Better Auth code or architecture.

Deliver a verifiable result

Include:

• protocol version and sources reviewed;
• role and flow decision;
• discovery and endpoint contract;
• consent and account-linking UX;
• credential, state, and scope model;
• validation and threat controls;
• revocation, audit, and incident plan;
• interoperability risks, including the audience ambiguity;
• tests for negative and recovery paths.

Resources

• references/protocol-discovery-and-flow-selection.md — discovery, protocol boundaries, audience ambiguity, and flow selection.
• references/agent-client-usage.md — consent, registration, claim polling, token use, and error recovery.
• references/service-implementation.md — endpoints, data model, grants, account linking, and state transitions.
• references/agent-provider-and-id-jag.md — provider consent, minting, JWKS, ID-JAG validation, and revocation events.
• references/better-auth-integration.md — supported primitives, missing native pieces, and a custom-plugin architecture.
• references/security-consent-and-operations.md — storage, scopes, audit, revocation, rate limits, and incident response.
• scripts/probe_auth_md.py — GET/HEAD-only discovery probe; never registers, claims, mints, exchanges, or submits secrets.