Reason

/veritasreason:reason

Apply reasoning over the knowledge graph. Usage: /veritasreason:reason <mode> [args]

$ARGUMENTS = reasoning mode + rules/observations/query.

deductive [--facts '<json-list>'] [--rules '<rule1>|<rule2>']

Apply deductive rules to known facts to derive new conclusions.

from veritasreason.reasoning.deductive_reasoner import DeductiveReasoner, Premise

reasoner = DeductiveReasoner()

# Add base facts to working memory
# Facts can be strings like "Person(John)" or structured dicts
import json
facts = json.loads(facts_json) if facts_json else []
reasoner.add_facts(facts)

# Apply logic with explicit premises
# Premise objects have: statement, confidence, source
premises = [
    Premise(statement=fact, confidence=1.0)
    for fact in facts
]

conclusions = reasoner.apply_logic(premises=premises)

Return: | Conclusion | Triggering Premises | Confidence | Rule Applied |

If zero rules given, run reasoner.prove_theorem() on any provided theorem:

proof = reasoner.prove_theorem(theorem=theorem_text)

Output: Proof: <proof.steps> | Valid: YES / NO

prove <theorem> [--facts '<json-list>']

Prove or disprove a theorem against known facts.

from veritasreason.reasoning.deductive_reasoner import DeductiveReasoner

reasoner = DeductiveReasoner()
import json
reasoner.add_facts(json.loads(facts_json) if facts_json else [])

proof = reasoner.prove_theorem(theorem=theorem)

Output:

Theorem: "<theorem>"
Result:  PROVED ✓  |  DISPROVED ✗  |  UNDECIDABLE ⚠

Proof steps:
  1. <premise> — <justification>
  2. ...
  → QED: <theorem>

Confidence: <proof.confidence>

abductive <observation> [--knowledge '<json-list>'] [--top N]

Generate and rank hypotheses that explain an observation.

from veritasreason.reasoning.abductive_reasoner import (
    AbductiveReasoner, Observation
)

reasoner = AbductiveReasoner()

import json
if knowledge_json:
    reasoner.add_knowledge(json.loads(knowledge_json))

obs = Observation(description=observation)

# Generate all hypotheses then rank them
hypotheses = reasoner.generate_hypotheses(observations=[obs])
ranked = reasoner.rank_hypotheses(hypotheses)
best = reasoner.get_best_explanation(obs)

# Also get full explanations with evidence
explanations = reasoner.find_explanations(observations=[obs])

Output:

Abductive Reasoning for: "<observation>"

Best explanation:
  <best.description>  (confidence: 0.87)

All hypotheses (ranked):
  | Rank | Hypothesis | Confidence | Supporting Evidence |
  |  1   | <hyp>      | 0.87       | <evidence>         |
  |  2   | ...

Full explanations:
  Explanation 1: <explanation.summary>
    Evidence: <evidence items>

datalog <program>

Evaluate a Datalog program over graph facts.

from veritasreason.reasoning.datalog_reasoner import DatalogReasoner
from veritasreason.context import ContextGraph

graph = ContextGraph()
reasoner = DatalogReasoner()

# program is a string of Datalog rules and queries
results = reasoner.evaluate(program=program, graph=graph)

Return derived tuples as a relation table. Show rule derivation counts.

sparql <query>

Run a SPARQL query over the knowledge graph and return results.

from veritasreason.reasoning.sparql_reasoner import SPARQLReasoner
from veritasreason.context import ContextGraph

graph = ContextGraph()
reasoner = SPARQLReasoner()

results = reasoner.query(sparql_query=query, graph=graph)

Return as a Markdown table with bound variable columns matching the SELECT clause.

rete [--rules '<rule1>|<rule2>'] [--facts '<json-list>']

Incremental rule evaluation using the Rete network with working memory.

from veritasreason.reasoning.rete_engine import ReteEngine
import json

engine = ReteEngine()

rules = rules_str.split("|") if rules_str else []
facts = json.loads(facts_json) if facts_json else []

engine.load_rules(rules)
engine.process_facts(facts)
activations = engine.get_activations()

Return: | Rule Fired | Variable Bindings | Working Memory Delta | Activation Order |

hypotheses "<scenario>" [--knowledge '<json-list>'] [--top N]

Generate the top-N most probable explanations for a complex scenario.

from veritasreason.reasoning.abductive_reasoner import AbductiveReasoner, Observation
import json

reasoner = AbductiveReasoner()
if knowledge_json:
    reasoner.add_knowledge(json.loads(knowledge_json))

obs = Observation(description=scenario)
hypotheses = reasoner.generate_hypotheses(observations=[obs])
ranked = reasoner.rank_hypotheses(hypotheses)
top_n = ranked[:int(n) if n else 5]

For each hypothesis also show: what evidence supports it, what would falsify it, and which is the most parsimonious (fewest assumptions).