name: 'virtual-lab-agent'
description: 'AI-powered virtual laboratory orchestrating multi-agent scientific research teams for autonomous hypothesis generation, experimental design, and validation in biomedical research.'
measurable_outcome: Execute skill workflow successfully with valid output within 15 minutes.
allowed-tools:
- read_file
- run_shell_command
Virtual Lab Agent
The Virtual Lab Agent orchestrates AI-powered virtual scientific research teams consisting of specialized agents (Principal Investigator, Immunologist, Computational Biologist, Machine Learning Specialist) to autonomously conduct biomedical research. Inspired by Stanford's AI Scientist model, it enables hypothesis generation, experimental design, in silico validation, and research synthesis.
When to Use This Skill
- When exploring new research hypotheses autonomously.
- For designing experiments with AI-generated protocols.
- To synthesize literature and generate research directions.
- When validating hypotheses through computational experiments.
- For multi-disciplinary research requiring diverse expertise.
Core Capabilities
Multi-Agent Research: Coordinate specialized AI scientists.
Hypothesis Generation: Generate testable research hypotheses.
Experimental Design: Design in silico and wet lab experiments.
Literature Synthesis: Comprehensive research landscape analysis.
Computational Validation: Test hypotheses computationally.
Research Documentation: Auto-generate papers and reports.
Virtual Lab Team
| Agent Role |
Expertise |
Responsibilities |
| Principal Investigator |
Strategy, oversight |
Direction, prioritization |
| Immunologist |
Immune biology |
Domain expertise |
| Computational Biologist |
Bioinformatics |
Data analysis |
| Machine Learning Specialist |
AI/ML methods |
Model development |
| Scientific Critic |
Validation |
Quality control |
Research Workflow
| Phase |
Activities |
Output |
| Ideation |
Literature review, gap identification |
Hypotheses |
| Planning |
Experimental design, resource allocation |
Protocol |
| Execution |
Computational experiments |
Raw results |
| Analysis |
Statistical analysis, interpretation |
Findings |
| Synthesis |
Paper writing, visualization |
Publication-ready |
Workflow
Research Question: Define the scientific question.
Team Assembly: Activate relevant specialist agents.
Literature Review: Synthesize existing knowledge.
Hypothesis Generation: Propose testable hypotheses.
Experimental Design: Design validation experiments.
Execution: Run computational experiments.
Output: Research findings, visualizations, manuscript.
Example Usage
User: "Design a research project to discover nanobody-based therapies against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants."
Agent Action:
python3 Skills/Clinical/Virtual_Lab_Agent/virtual_lab.py \
--research_question "Design nanobodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike variants" \
--team_config immunologist,comp_bio,ml_specialist \
--literature_scope "nanobody,SARS-CoV-2,spike,variants" \
--experimental_type computational,in_silico \
--validation_method binding_prediction,md_simulation \
--output_format research_report \
--output virtual_lab_results/
Input Parameters
| Parameter |
Description |
Options |
| Research Question |
Core scientific question |
Free text |
| Team Config |
Specialist agents needed |
List of agents |
| Literature Scope |
Search terms and databases |
Keywords |
| Experimental Type |
In silico, computational |
Type list |
| Validation Method |
How to test hypotheses |
Method list |
| Output Format |
Report, paper, presentation |
Format |
Output Components
| Output |
Description |
Format |
| Research Report |
Comprehensive findings |
.md, .pdf |
| Hypothesis Ranking |
Prioritized hypotheses |
.csv |
| Experimental Protocols |
Detailed methods |
.json |
| Computational Results |
Simulation outputs |
Various |
| Visualizations |
Figures and plots |
.png, .svg |
| Draft Manuscript |
Publication-ready text |
.docx, .tex |
| Supplementary Data |
Raw data and code |
.zip |
AI Agent Interactions
| Interaction |
Agents |
Purpose |
| Debate |
PI + Critic |
Hypothesis refinement |
| Design Review |
CompBio + ML |
Method selection |
| Interpretation |
All |
Result synthesis |
| Quality Control |
Critic |
Validation |
Research Domains Supported
| Domain |
Example Questions |
Key Agents |
| Drug Discovery |
Novel targets, compounds |
CompBio, ML |
| Immunotherapy |
CAR-T design, neoantigens |
Immunologist |
| Genomics |
Variant interpretation |
CompBio, ML |
| Structural Biology |
Protein design |
CompBio, ML |
| Clinical |
Biomarker discovery |
All |
AI/ML Components
Literature Mining:
- PubMed/bioRxiv search
- Entity extraction
- Knowledge graph construction
Hypothesis Generation:
- Gap analysis
- Analogy-based reasoning
- Causal inference
Experimental Design:
- Protocol templates
- Power calculations
- Control selection
Result Interpretation:
- Statistical analysis
- Visualization generation
- Narrative synthesis
Validation Framework
| Validation Level |
Method |
Confidence |
| Computational |
In silico prediction |
Moderate |
| Literature |
Existing evidence |
Variable |
| Structural |
AlphaFold modeling |
High (structure) |
| Experimental |
Wet lab validation |
Highest |
Stanford AI Scientist Reference
| Capability |
Implementation |
Status |
| Nanobody Design |
SARS-CoV-2 variants |
Validated |
| Binding Prediction |
AF-based docking |
Active |
| Lab Validation |
Wet lab confirmation |
Promising results |
| Generalization |
Other domains |
Expanding |
Prerequisites
- Python 3.10+
- LLM APIs (Claude, GPT-4)
- Literature databases access
- Computational biology tools
- AlphaFold2/3 installation
Related Skills
- Digital_Twin_Clinical_Agent - Patient simulation
- scFoundation_Model_Agent - Single-cell analysis
- CryoEM_AI_Drug_Design_Agent - Structure-based design
- PROTAC_Design_Agent - Degrader design
Research Quality Control
| QC Check |
Criterion |
Action |
| Novelty |
Not already published |
Literature check |
| Feasibility |
Resources available |
Resource audit |
| Reproducibility |
Clear methods |
Protocol review |
| Statistical Power |
Adequate samples |
Power analysis |
| Bias |
Confounders addressed |
Critic review |
Special Considerations
- Hallucination Risk: Verify agent claims against literature
- Citation Accuracy: Double-check all references
- Experimental Validity: Wet lab confirmation needed
- Ethical Review: Human subjects require IRB
- Novelty Assessment: Ensure genuine contribution
Limitations
| Limitation |
Impact |
Mitigation |
| No Wet Lab |
Computational only |
Collaborator network |
| LLM Errors |
Factual mistakes |
Multi-agent verification |
| Creativity Bounds |
Within training data |
Human oversight |
| Domain Limits |
Knowledge cutoffs |
Database updates |
Future Directions
| Enhancement |
Timeline |
Impact |
| Lab Automation |
Present |
Self-driving labs |
| Real-time Literature |
Active |
Current knowledge |
| Multi-modal Data |
Emerging |
Richer insights |
| Full Autonomy |
Future |
End-to-end research |
Author
AI Group - Biomedical AI Platform
1---2name: virtual-lab-agent3description: <!--4---5<!--6# COPYRIGHT NOTICE7# This file is part of the "Universal Biomedical Skills" project.8# Copyright (c) 2026 MD BABU MIA, PhD <md.babu.mia@mssm.edu>9# All Rights Reserved.10#11# This code is proprietary and confidential.12# Unauthorized copying of this file, via any medium is strictly prohibited.13#14# Provenance: Authenticated by MD BABU MIA1516-->1718---19name: 'virtual-lab-agent'20description: 'AI-powered virtual laboratory orchestrating multi-agent scientific research teams for autonomous hypothesis generation, experimental design, and validation in biomedical research.'21measurable_outcome: Execute skill workflow successfully with valid output within 15 minutes.22allowed-tools:23 - read_file24 - run_shell_command25---262728# Virtual Lab Agent2930The **Virtual Lab Agent** orchestrates AI-powered virtual scientific research teams consisting of specialized agents (Principal Investigator, Immunologist, Computational Biologist, Machine Learning Specialist) to autonomously conduct biomedical research. Inspired by Stanford's AI Scientist model, it enables hypothesis generation, experimental design, in silico validation, and research synthesis.3132## When to Use This Skill3334* When exploring new research hypotheses autonomously.35* For designing experiments with AI-generated protocols.36* To synthesize literature and generate research directions.37* When validating hypotheses through computational experiments.38* For multi-disciplinary research requiring diverse expertise.3940## Core Capabilities41421. **Multi-Agent Research**: Coordinate specialized AI scientists.43442. **Hypothesis Generation**: Generate testable research hypotheses.45463. **Experimental Design**: Design in silico and wet lab experiments.47484. **Literature Synthesis**: Comprehensive research landscape analysis.49505. **Computational Validation**: Test hypotheses computationally.51526. **Research Documentation**: Auto-generate papers and reports.5354## Virtual Lab Team5556| Agent Role | Expertise | Responsibilities |57|------------|-----------|------------------|58| Principal Investigator | Strategy, oversight | Direction, prioritization |59| Immunologist | Immune biology | Domain expertise |60| Computational Biologist | Bioinformatics | Data analysis |61| Machine Learning Specialist | AI/ML methods | Model development |62| Scientific Critic | Validation | Quality control |6364## Research Workflow6566| Phase | Activities | Output |67|-------|------------|--------|68| Ideation | Literature review, gap identification | Hypotheses |69| Planning | Experimental design, resource allocation | Protocol |70| Execution | Computational experiments | Raw results |71| Analysis | Statistical analysis, interpretation | Findings |72| Synthesis | Paper writing, visualization | Publication-ready |7374## Workflow75761. **Research Question**: Define the scientific question.77782. **Team Assembly**: Activate relevant specialist agents.79803. **Literature Review**: Synthesize existing knowledge.81824. **Hypothesis Generation**: Propose testable hypotheses.83845. **Experimental Design**: Design validation experiments.85866. **Execution**: Run computational experiments.87887. **Output**: Research findings, visualizations, manuscript.8990## Example Usage9192**User**: "Design a research project to discover nanobody-based therapies against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants."9394**Agent Action**:95```bash96python3 Skills/Clinical/Virtual_Lab_Agent/virtual_lab.py \97 --research_question "Design nanobodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike variants" \98 --team_config immunologist,comp_bio,ml_specialist \99 --literature_scope "nanobody,SARS-CoV-2,spike,variants" \100 --experimental_type computational,in_silico \101 --validation_method binding_prediction,md_simulation \102 --output_format research_report \103 --output virtual_lab_results/104```105106## Input Parameters107108| Parameter | Description | Options |109|-----------|-------------|---------|110| Research Question | Core scientific question | Free text |111| Team Config | Specialist agents needed | List of agents |112| Literature Scope | Search terms and databases | Keywords |113| Experimental Type | In silico, computational | Type list |114| Validation Method | How to test hypotheses | Method list |115| Output Format | Report, paper, presentation | Format |116117## Output Components118119| Output | Description | Format |120|--------|-------------|--------|121| Research Report | Comprehensive findings | .md, .pdf |122| Hypothesis Ranking | Prioritized hypotheses | .csv |123| Experimental Protocols | Detailed methods | .json |124| Computational Results | Simulation outputs | Various |125| Visualizations | Figures and plots | .png, .svg |126| Draft Manuscript | Publication-ready text | .docx, .tex |127| Supplementary Data | Raw data and code | .zip |128129## AI Agent Interactions130131| Interaction | Agents | Purpose |132|-------------|--------|---------|133| Debate | PI + Critic | Hypothesis refinement |134| Design Review | CompBio + ML | Method selection |135| Interpretation | All | Result synthesis |136| Quality Control | Critic | Validation |137138## Research Domains Supported139140| Domain | Example Questions | Key Agents |141|--------|-------------------|------------|142| Drug Discovery | Novel targets, compounds | CompBio, ML |143| Immunotherapy | CAR-T design, neoantigens | Immunologist |144| Genomics | Variant interpretation | CompBio, ML |145| Structural Biology | Protein design | CompBio, ML |146| Clinical | Biomarker discovery | All |147148## AI/ML Components149150**Literature Mining**:151- PubMed/bioRxiv search152- Entity extraction153- Knowledge graph construction154155**Hypothesis Generation**:156- Gap analysis157- Analogy-based reasoning158- Causal inference159160**Experimental Design**:161- Protocol templates162- Power calculations163- Control selection164165**Result Interpretation**:166- Statistical analysis167- Visualization generation168- Narrative synthesis169170## Validation Framework171172| Validation Level | Method | Confidence |173|------------------|--------|------------|174| Computational | In silico prediction | Moderate |175| Literature | Existing evidence | Variable |176| Structural | AlphaFold modeling | High (structure) |177| Experimental | Wet lab validation | Highest |178179## Stanford AI Scientist Reference180181| Capability | Implementation | Status |182|------------|----------------|--------|183| Nanobody Design | SARS-CoV-2 variants | Validated |184| Binding Prediction | AF-based docking | Active |185| Lab Validation | Wet lab confirmation | Promising results |186| Generalization | Other domains | Expanding |187188## Prerequisites189190* Python 3.10+191* LLM APIs (Claude, GPT-4)192* Literature databases access193* Computational biology tools194* AlphaFold2/3 installation195196## Related Skills197198* Digital_Twin_Clinical_Agent - Patient simulation199* scFoundation_Model_Agent - Single-cell analysis200* CryoEM_AI_Drug_Design_Agent - Structure-based design201* PROTAC_Design_Agent - Degrader design202203## Research Quality Control204205| QC Check | Criterion | Action |206|----------|-----------|--------|207| Novelty | Not already published | Literature check |208| Feasibility | Resources available | Resource audit |209| Reproducibility | Clear methods | Protocol review |210| Statistical Power | Adequate samples | Power analysis |211| Bias | Confounders addressed | Critic review |212213## Special Considerations2142151. **Hallucination Risk**: Verify agent claims against literature2162. **Citation Accuracy**: Double-check all references2173. **Experimental Validity**: Wet lab confirmation needed2184. **Ethical Review**: Human subjects require IRB2195. **Novelty Assessment**: Ensure genuine contribution220221## Limitations222223| Limitation | Impact | Mitigation |224|------------|--------|------------|225| No Wet Lab | Computational only | Collaborator network |226| LLM Errors | Factual mistakes | Multi-agent verification |227| Creativity Bounds | Within training data | Human oversight |228| Domain Limits | Knowledge cutoffs | Database updates |229230## Future Directions231232| Enhancement | Timeline | Impact |233|-------------|----------|--------|234| Lab Automation | Present | Self-driving labs |235| Real-time Literature | Active | Current knowledge |236| Multi-modal Data | Emerging | Richer insights |237| Full Autonomy | Future | End-to-end research |238239## Author240241AI Group - Biomedical AI Platform242243244<!-- AUTHOR_SIGNATURE: 9a7f3c2e-MD-BABU-MIA-2026-MSSM-SECURE -->