Create Pr

Create PR

Prerequisites: GitHub CLI

This workflow uses gh to check for existing PRs, fetch issue details, and create the PR. Follow the check-github-cli skill first (ensure gh auth status succeeds; if not, guide the user to install/configure gh and do not proceed). The account needs read access to the repo and write access to create PRs and manage labels.

Pick the mode

Note: In the command output, format all URLs as clickable Markdown links: [Link Text](URL).

Check the current branch (git branch --show-current) and its open PR (gh pr list --head <BRANCH> --state open), then:

• A. Draft placeholder — no PR exists and the work is not done yet: the branch holds a freshly written spec from the task workflow (typically invoked from the to-spec skill, or the branch's only changes are under .agents/tasks/). The PR is a placeholder for work to come.
• B. Finalize draft — a draft PR already exists for the branch and the work is done: reached via the finalize-task handoff (which has just pruned the task folder down to spec.md), or the user asks to make it ready for review.
• C. Regular PR — no PR exists and the work is already done (a task executed without the spec workflow). This is the classic flow.
• A non-draft PR already exists → don't create or update anything; write the description content as a summary for the user (per Mode C step 2), tell them the PR is already open, and link to it.

If the signals conflict or are ambiguous, ask the user which mode they mean.

PR title (all modes)

The title must stand on its own — a reader who has never heard of the parent task should understand what the PR does from the title alone:

• Describe the change in plain language, scoped accurately — derive it from the spec's Context & goal, not from a breakdown shorthand.
• No issue numbers, "step N", or internal codenames/jargon (lever 3) in the title — those are abstract to an outside reader. The parent-task relationship lives in the description (Resolves #N + the spec link).

Mode A — Draft placeholder (spec time)

Reached from to-spec after the developer approved the spec content: that approval already covers this whole mode, so run steps 1–5 without re-confirming. A direct invocation keeps the confirmation in step 3.

At this stage nothing is implemented, so do not describe changes, env vars, or checklists — the description is a placeholder pointing at the plan:

1. Prepare the branch — commit spec.md and questions.md if needed (with the user's approval), push with -u.
2. Compose the placeholder body (skip the PR template — it describes finished work):
   • Resolves #<ISSUE_NUMBER> — the branch is issue-<number>, so extract the number from it.
   • One short paragraph: the task's goal, taken from the spec's Context & goal.
   • A link to the spec file on this branch: .agents/tasks/<dir>/spec.md.
   • A note that this is a spec-first draft: the branch will receive the task's work ticket by ticket, and the final description will be written when the PR is marked ready for review.
3. Confirm with the user, then create as draft: gh pr create --draft --title "..." --body-file .... Title per "PR title" above (not "spec for..."; the PR becomes the task's PR, describing the whole task).
4. Labels — copy the issue's labels (gh issue view <N> --json labels). Skip ENVs/dependencies labels — nothing is implemented yet; Mode B adds them from the real diff.
5. Link the created PR in the output.

Mode B — Finalize a draft into ready-for-review

1. Prepare the branch — ensure everything is committed and pushed; verify up-to-dateness with main (git fetch origin main, git rev-list --left-right --count origin/main...HEAD), merge if the user wants; resolve conflicts before continuing.
2. Rewrite the description following "Writing the description" below — the placeholder body is replaced wholesale: gh pr edit <N> --body-file ....
3. Labels from the real diff — ENVs label if ./docs/ENVS.md changed; dependencies label only if the dependency sections of package.json changed (dependencies, devDependencies, peerDependencies, pnpm/overrides) — inspect git diff origin/main -- package.json and ignore changes confined to scripts or other fields; plus the issue's labels if not already copied.
4. Confirm with the user, then flip: gh pr ready <N>. (On flipping, the Checks workflow runs — drafts skip it by design.)
5. Link the PR in the output.

Mode C — Regular PR (work already done)

1. Prepare the branch — as Mode B step 1, plus commit any outstanding changes (with the user's approval, clear message). When the work sits on main, create the branch first: issue-<number> when it came from an issue, otherwise a kebab-case slug naming the change.
2. Write the description — see "Writing the description" below.
3. Confirm with the user, then create: gh pr create --title "..." --body-file ... (add --draft only if the user asked for it).
4. Labels — as Mode B step 3.
5. Link the created PR in the output.

Writing the description (Modes B and C)

• Use the template from ./docs/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md as the base. Read it and fill in each section.
• Issue number from branch name: If the branch name matches issue-\d+, extract the number, fetch the issue (gh issue view <N>), and start the Description section with Resolves #<ISSUE_NUMBER>.
• Summary of changes: clear and concise, at most two paragraphs; bullet points if needed. Be precise; keep it short. This is the Description section.
• The why, whenever there is no spec to hold it. A diff shows what changed; the Description is the only place the reasoning survives, and most PRs through this skill have no spec behind them — work done by hand, and tasks small enough to finish inside their own grilling session. Add the problem the change solves and any decision a reader would otherwise have to reverse-engineer, sourced from wherever it actually is:
  • This conversation, when the work happened here — the decisions and the alternatives ruled out are already in context; use them.
  • The issue, when the branch names one — its body states the problem the diff only implies.
  • The diff and the surrounding code, otherwise. Infer the intent and write it plainly, then let the user correct it at the confirmation step — that is what the confirmation is for. Where the reasoning genuinely cannot be recovered, ask the user for it rather than inventing a rationale.
• Environment variables: if any env vars were added, changed, or removed, compare or read ./docs/ENVS.md (and the validator/ENVS docs if relevant) and fill the Environment variables section with each variable change and its purpose (write "None" if there are none):
  • Bad: "Added NEXT_PUBLIC_VIEWS_TX_GROUPED_FEES environment variable to the documentation."
  • Good: "Added NEXT_PUBLIC_VIEWS_TX_GROUPED_FEES to group transaction fees into one section on the transaction page."
  • Good: "Extended possible values for NEXT_PUBLIC_VIEWS_TX_ADDITIONAL_FIELDS with set_max_gas_limit to display the maximum gas price set by the transaction sender."
  • Good: "Introduced a new option, "fee reception", for the NEXT_PUBLIC_NETWORK_VERIFICATION_TYPE variable."
• Minimum API version: fill the Minimum API version section from the spec header's Minimum API version row — it may list several services for a multi-service raise (e.g. "Core API v11.2.4+, Admin RS microservice v2.1+"). Mode C or an empty row → infer from the diff or write "None".