blogic-cz Testing Patterns
Use this skill to choose the lightest effective test type and apply project-consistent patterns for Vitest unit tests, TRPC integration tests with PGlite, and Playwright E2E tests.
Test Hierarchy (prefer simpler first)
- Unit tests (preferred) - Cover pure functions, parsers, and Effect services.
- TRPC integration tests - Cover full TRPC + database behavior.
- E2E tests - Cover browser and full user flows.
When to Use Each
| Situation | Test Type | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Pure function, parser, util | Unit | Write immediately |
| Effect service with dependencies | Unit with mock layers | Write immediately |
| TRPC procedure (DB logic) | TRPC integration | Follow decision process |
| User-facing flow, UI behavior | E2E | Follow decision process |
Test File Locations
| Code Location | Test Location |
|---|---|
packages/X/src/file.ts |
packages/X/src/__tests__/file.test.ts |
apps/web-app/src/infrastructure/trpc/routers/X.ts |
apps/web-app/src/__tests__/X.test.ts |
apps/web-app/src/routes/** |
apps/web-app/e2e/feature.e2e.ts |
Decision Process (canonical)
Before writing any test, apply this sequence:
- Can this be unit tested? Write a unit test immediately.
- Does this require DB behavior (joins, constraints, TRPC + persistence)?
- If the user explicitly requested an integration test, implement it directly.
- Otherwise, ask a question like: "Would you like an integration test for this TRPC/database behavior?"
- Does this require browser/UI flow validation?
- If the user explicitly requested E2E coverage, implement it directly.
- Otherwise, ask a question like: "Would you like an E2E test here? It is the most expensive test type to maintain."
Never re-ask for a test type that the user already requested explicitly.
Unit Test Patterns
Use unit tests by default.
For concrete examples, see references/examples.md:
- Basic Vitest
- Effect tests with
@effect/vitestand mock layers - Service-layer tests using real service logic with mocked boundaries
Clarify terminology: "service-layer tests using real service logic with mocked boundaries" means testing the real service implementation while replacing external boundaries (for example HTTP, DB, or filesystem clients) with mocks.
TRPC Integration Test Patterns
Follow the canonical decision process above for consent and escalation.
For concrete setup and seed-helper examples, see references/examples.md.
Use seed helpers from @project/db/testing to set up the minimum required state per case.
E2E Test Patterns
Follow the canonical decision process above for consent and escalation.
For concrete E2E and auth-helper examples, see references/examples.md.
Warn about maintenance cost only when E2E was not explicitly requested.
Commands
bun run test # Run all unit + TRPC integration tests
bun run test:watch # Watch mode
bun run test:coverage # With coverage
bun run test:e2e # Run E2E tests
bun run test:e2e:ui # E2E with UI
# Run specific test file (FROM PROJECT ROOT, full path required)
bun run vitest run packages/common/src/__tests__/pagination.test.ts
bun run vitest run apps/web-app/src/__tests__/formatters.test.ts
Avoid these command patterns:
# These DO NOT work:
bun run test packages/common/src/__tests__/file.test.ts # script doesn't accept path
cd packages/common && bun run vitest run src/__tests__/file.test.ts # wrong cwd