How do I install the Confidence Check skill?

Run npx skillmds@latest add bogerpeng/confidence-check in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.

Is Confidence Check safe to use?

This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.

Which AI agents work with Confidence Check?

This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.

Is Confidence Check free to use?

Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free, and the skill stays under its author's original license.

Who published Confidence Check?

bogerpeng (@bogerpeng) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.

Confidence Check by bogerpeng — Agent Skill

Name: Confidence Check
Author: bogerpeng

Confidence Check

Pre-implementation confidence assessment (≥90% required). Use before starting any implementation to verify readiness with duplicate check, architecture compliance, official docs verification, OSS references, and root cause identification.

bogerpeng cd64d56 2 files · 13.1 KB Updated Sep 17, 2026

File contents

Confidence Check Skill

Purpose

Prevents wrong-direction execution by assessing confidence BEFORE starting implementation.

Requirement: ≥90% confidence to proceed with implementation.

Test Results (2025-10-21):

Precision: 1.000 (no false positives)
Recall: 1.000 (no false negatives)
8/8 test cases passed

When to Use

Use this skill BEFORE implementing any task to ensure:

No duplicate implementations exist
Architecture compliance verified
Official documentation reviewed
Working OSS implementations found
Root cause properly identified

Confidence Assessment Criteria

Calculate confidence score (0.0 - 1.0) based on 5 checks:

1. No Duplicate Implementations? (25%)

Check: Search codebase for existing functionality

# Use Grep to search for similar functions
# Use Glob to find related modules

✅ Pass if no duplicates found ❌ Fail if similar implementation exists

2. Architecture Compliance? (25%)

Check: Verify tech stack alignment

Read CLAUDE.md, PLANNING.md
Confirm existing patterns used
Avoid reinventing existing solutions

✅ Pass if uses existing tech stack (e.g., Supabase, UV, pytest) ❌ Fail if introduces new dependencies unnecessarily

3. Official Documentation Verified? (20%)

Check: Review official docs before implementation

Use Context7 MCP for official docs
Use WebFetch for documentation URLs
Verify API compatibility

✅ Pass if official docs reviewed ❌ Fail if relying on assumptions

4. Working OSS Implementations Referenced? (15%)

Check: Find proven implementations

Use Tavily MCP or WebSearch
Search GitHub for examples
Verify working code samples

✅ Pass if OSS reference found ❌ Fail if no working examples

5. Root Cause Identified? (15%)

Check: Understand the actual problem

Analyze error messages
Check logs and stack traces
Identify underlying issue

✅ Pass if root cause clear ❌ Fail if symptoms unclear

Confidence Score Calculation

Total = Check1 (25%) + Check2 (25%) + Check3 (20%) + Check4 (15%) + Check5 (15%)

If Total >= 0.90:  ✅ Proceed with implementation
If Total >= 0.70:  ⚠️  Present alternatives, ask questions
If Total < 0.70:   ❌ STOP - Request more context

Output Format

📋 Confidence Checks:
   ✅ No duplicate implementations found
   ✅ Uses existing tech stack
   ✅ Official documentation verified
   ✅ Working OSS implementation found
   ✅ Root cause identified

📊 Confidence: 1.00 (100%)
✅ High confidence - Proceeding to implementation

Implementation Details

The TypeScript implementation is available in confidence.ts for reference, containing:

confidenceCheck(context) - Main assessment function
Detailed check implementations
Context interface definitions

ROI

Token Savings: Spend 100-200 tokens on confidence check to save 5,000-50,000 tokens on wrong-direction work.

Success Rate: 100% precision and recall in production testing.

---name: confidence-checkdescription: Pre-implementation confidence assessment (≥90% required). Use before starting any implementation to verify readiness with duplicate check, architecture compliance, official docs verification, OSS references, and root cause identification.---# Confidence Check Skill## PurposePrevents wrong-direction execution by assessing confidence **BEFORE** starting implementation.**Requirement**: ≥90% confidence to proceed with implementation.**Test Results** (2025-10-21):- Precision: 1.000 (no false positives)- Recall: 1.000 (no false negatives)- 8/8 test cases passed## When to UseUse this skill BEFORE implementing any task to ensure:- No duplicate implementations exist- Architecture compliance verified- Official documentation reviewed- Working OSS implementations found- Root cause properly identified## Confidence Assessment CriteriaCalculate confidence score (0.0 - 1.0) based on 5 checks:### 1. No Duplicate Implementations? (25%)**Check**: Search codebase for existing functionality```bash# Use Grep to search for similar functions# Use Glob to find related modules```✅ Pass if no duplicates found❌ Fail if similar implementation exists### 2. Architecture Compliance? (25%)**Check**: Verify tech stack alignment- Read `CLAUDE.md`, `PLANNING.md`- Confirm existing patterns used- Avoid reinventing existing solutions✅ Pass if uses existing tech stack (e.g., Supabase, UV, pytest)❌ Fail if introduces new dependencies unnecessarily### 3. Official Documentation Verified? (20%)**Check**: Review official docs before implementation- Use Context7 MCP for official docs- Use WebFetch for documentation URLs- Verify API compatibility✅ Pass if official docs reviewed❌ Fail if relying on assumptions### 4. Working OSS Implementations Referenced? (15%)**Check**: Find proven implementations- Use Tavily MCP or WebSearch- Search GitHub for examples- Verify working code samples✅ Pass if OSS reference found❌ Fail if no working examples### 5. Root Cause Identified? (15%)**Check**: Understand the actual problem- Analyze error messages- Check logs and stack traces- Identify underlying issue✅ Pass if root cause clear❌ Fail if symptoms unclear## Confidence Score Calculation```Total = Check1 (25%) + Check2 (25%) + Check3 (20%) + Check4 (15%) + Check5 (15%)If Total >= 0.90: ✅ Proceed with implementationIf Total >= 0.70: ⚠️ Present alternatives, ask questionsIf Total < 0.70: ❌ STOP - Request more context```## Output Format```📋 Confidence Checks: ✅ No duplicate implementations found ✅ Uses existing tech stack ✅ Official documentation verified ✅ Working OSS implementation found ✅ Root cause identified📊 Confidence: 1.00 (100%)✅ High confidence - Proceeding to implementation```## Implementation DetailsThe TypeScript implementation is available in `confidence.ts` for reference, containing:- `confidenceCheck(context)` - Main assessment function- Detailed check implementations- Context interface definitions## ROI**Token Savings**: Spend 100-200 tokens on confidence check to save 5,000-50,000 tokens on wrong-direction work.**Success Rate**: 100% precision and recall in production testing.

Frequently asked questions